A leisurely drive to Indonesia

Ah, the paid fed­eral hol­i­day. Who loves you, baby? I do. Even if I am only a part-time worker, I get full time pay for sit­ting here and doing what I do, or don’t do.

One ter­rific ben­e­fit of the day off is the sleep-in. Sleep­ing in has increas­ingly become a trea­sured part of life lately. I am sure a thor­ough exam­i­na­tion of my mind — fright­en­ing as it is to imag­ine — might yield the cen­tral rea­son or rea­sons why only in a mat­ter of years I have become so fond of late sleep­ing. What­ever the rea­sons, I find dream­ing to be much richer dur­ing these series of morn­ing naps.

This morn­ing I drove to Indone­sia. Yes, it’s a neat trick if you don’t live in Indone­sia what with all the water sur­round­ing the 17,500-something islands that make up the South­east Asian-Oceanic nation. What’s more, I drove (actu­ally I rode with my friends War­ren and Stacy), then drove back and was get­ting ready for a return drive to Indone­sia when my dream ran out of tracks.

Dreams can be like a great, or a really bad, or ter­ri­fy­ing, movie. Of course, they are very short films which make “Let’s Go Out to the Lobby” seem like “Dances With Wolves.”

I don’t know why I dreamed of Indone­sia, much less dri­ving there from Whereverville. It’s strange to think how the mind gets around to the peo­ple you know and the places you’ve been. I can under­stand dream­ing of War­ren and Stacy. They are two of my clos­est friends. I think I intro­duced them 20-something years ago and it wasn’t long before they were together as a cou­ple and later mar­ried. Indone­sia is a bit more complicated.

If my mem­ory serves me. If my mem­ory serves me. What did I order any­way? As I was say­ing, if my mem­ory serves me I vis­ited Jakarta in Jan­u­ary 1978. My ship, well, the Navy’s ship, or the tax­pay­ers’ ship, spent about three or four days there on a port visit just after two months of dif­fer­ent port calls in New Zealand and Aus­tralia. Those “down under” coun­tries were some­what of a shock in that they were beau­ti­ful and had some of the nicest and friend­liest peo­ple one might see out­side Texas. Indone­sia was a whole dif­fer­ent load of cargo.

Of the places I vis­ited that year on my deploy­ment, which also included Fiji, Tai­wan, Guam and our “port away from home­port” Subic Bay, the Philip­pines, Jakarta was the most for­eign. In fact, Indone­sia was the most for­eign coun­try I have ever visited.

Per­haps I should only men­tion one of the odd expe­ri­ences I had in Indone­sia. This hap­pened on the very first day in port.

My ship­mates and I were loaded on a bus, pur­port­edly, on our way to a com­pound at the Amer­i­can Embassy. There was a fairly major prob­lem, how­ever. Our dri­ver spoke no Eng­lish and no one in our crew spoke what­ever his lan­guage might have been. While some of my fel­low squids tried to use sign lan­guage or Cha­rades to deter­mine just where the hell we were going, I heard a “thump” which was fol­lowed by a very disturbed-sounding mur­mur by some of my mates.

The street on which we were rid­ing had an out­side bike lane and appar­ently our run­away bus dri­ver pulled into this lane and struck a bicy­clist, then just kept going. I couldn’t see it because I was on the other side of the bus and there were guys stand­ing in the aisle. Those who did see the spec­ta­cle said it wasn’t pretty. About six or seven of us finally had enough as we were dri­ving through what appeared to be a cen­tral busi­ness dis­trict, what with sky­scrap­ers seem­ingly as far as the eye could see. (Jakarta is quite a large city which had a pop­u­la­tion then of about 5–6 mil­lion peo­ple. Today it has nearly 9 mil­lion.) Those of us who got off the bus went into the lounge of a Sher­a­ton and finally found an Eng­lish speak­ing man with an old car who agreed to be our com­bi­na­tion “taxi driver-tour guide” that day for what was a very rea­son­able sum. The rest I shall not divulge other than to say it was an adven­ture of “sailors being sailors.”

I actu­ally had kind of a cul­tural over­load dur­ing my time in Jakarta. I saw some unbe­liev­ably majes­tic struc­tures which, I can only sup­pose, had some­thing to do with Indone­sia hav­ing the largest Islamic pop­u­la­tion in the world. I also saw some of the most abject poverty I had ever wit­nessed includ­ing sights you’d only see in “National Geo­graphic.” On a pedes­trian over­pass cross­ing a major high­way sat an arm­less and leg­less woman on a cart, with a can next to her for dona­tions. Then, of course, I men­tioned the hit-an-run by our bus dri­ver. In more recent times, these mem­o­ries have kind of made me won­der if Pres­i­dent Obama viewed such scenes when he lived in Indonesia?

For­tu­nately, I rarely have bad or even dis­turb­ing dreams thank­fully. So my foray into Indone­sia in slum­ber was more detailed with con­cerns about time or other engage­ments, those things we deal with in rou­tine. All in all though, some of those things which go on in your brain dur­ing down­time can yield some pretty fas­ci­nat­ing stuff. Writ­ten on the bath­room wall of our thoughts: “For a good time call 1–800-THE-MIND.”

Goat maintenance? Outlets say al-Qaida has new magazine

Quite a few doubters exist, but var­i­ous media out­lets report that al-Qaida has pub­lished a slick mag­a­zine.

The pub­li­ca­tion, report­edly called Insight, fea­tures such arti­cles as “What to Expect in a Jihad” and “How to Make a Bomb in the Kitchen of Your Mom.” Although some of the arti­cles with word­ing such as the the lat­ter one seem more satir­i­cal than one steeped in a trans­la­tion fail­ure the mag has sup­pos­edly cre­ated a buzz on the Ara­bian penin­sula, accord­ing to a piece by Marc Ambinder on Atlantic Monthly’s Web site The Atlantic.

But even skep­ti­cism exists on The Atlantic as writer Max Fisher spells out five dif­fer­ent rea­sons to doubt the publication’s authen­tic­ity. The dubi­ous­ness Fisher cites includes the rabid secrecy of the ter­ror group’s lead­ers such as Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri as well as a sus­pi­cion by the so-called “Web-based ‘jihadi’ community.”

Still, given that the lead­er­ship of al-Quida has been rel­e­gated to liv­ing in caves and prim­i­tive con­di­tions for years and that its agents as of late have not always proved to be the most reli­able sticks of dyna­mite in the box, one who lives for the use of words (and their mis­use) would love to see what kind of prod­uct could be turned out by such fanat­i­cal bozos. Per­haps we would see sto­ries such as:

“When 74 Vir­gins Prove 74 Too Many: A Dis­cus­sion of Mar­tyr Anxiety.”

“al-Zawari Crit­i­cized For ‘Mis­sion Accom­plished’ Ban­ner Across Cave Entrance.”

“Osama bin Laden’s Secrets to a Healthy Diet of Weeds and Rocks.

“Care for the Length­i­est Beards: 5 Tips That Will Make You the Envy of Prospec­tive Sui­cide Bombers.”

“Escape from Hell: al-Qaida Ex-Prisoner Claims Amer­i­cans Forced Him to Lis­ten to Six Hours of Toby Keith Songs.”

Well, maybe their mag­a­zine, if they have a mag­a­zine, wouldn’t have such enlight­en­ing sto­ries and would have fare more like “Your Goat: Your Friend. Your Feast.” Still it’s always good to see what the enemy is read­ing. Even if it is total bulls**t.

Some thoughts from the local lawyer who kicked BP’s ass

Meet one of my home­town folks. Well, it seems like a have a lot of home­town folks because, in addi­tion to my home­town, I have a sec­ondary and ter­tiary home­town. I plan on writ­ing about my sec­ondary one later this week. Or that’s the plan. Beau­mont, Texas, is my ter­tiary home­town. Any­way, this home­town folk I intro­duce today (I don’t know him but wouldn’t mind) has the improb­a­ble name of Brent Coon.

Coon, who plays in a rock band and hangs around with knock­out women, and (he also has a music com­pany and a whole flock of bikini-clad “coon­pups”) is a big dog in tort law right now. This is because in the court room he cleaned BP’s — yes, that BP — clock over the Texas City refin­ery explo­sion in 2005 that killed 15 and injured 170.

The head Coon­dog has a reveal­ing, “as told to,” story about BP that can be found right here on Esquire’s Web site. Yes, that Esquire. One of my favorite mag­a­zines in the whole wide world.

Now you can dis­miss Coon totally or par­tially, if you want, because he is a plaintiff’s lawyer from one of the most plaintiff-friendly towns on Earth — that is if you believe the anti-plaintiff U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce (not the guys and gals who wel­come you to town and has all the great maps and brochures but the cham­ber that owns one of the news­pa­pers they pub­lish nation­ally to try and scare poten­tial plain­tiffs’ juries.) But, to par­don the bad and poor tast­ing pun, where there is smoke there’s fire — and oil in BP’s case. That is what some friends and rel­a­tives, one with a Ph.D. in geol­ogy who works in deep drilling, tell me about BP’s rep­u­ta­tion in the oil and gas indus­try. These peo­ple say, basi­cally, “BP sucks” when it comes to safety.

So say what you want about Coon­dog, but this guy has got it going on when it comes to BP. And appar­ently to liv­ing la vida!

Welcome clouds from Alex and I-10, you can’t get to there from here

It was nice hav­ing the clouds today that are part of TS/TD — or what­ever — Alex. It was still humid and sticky but at least the clouds shielded the sun. Hope­fully, Alex will not develop into more than a Cat 1 hur­ri­cane and will not head toward the Upper Texas Coast while all the fore­casts call for it to stay in South Texas and Mex­ico. We could use a lit­tle more rain although the show­ers and thun­der­show­ers we got today were not unwelcome.

Now for some­thing com­pletely dif­fer­ent. I was dri­ving east on I-10 just west of Vidor when I saw cars slow­ing down and quickly com­ing to a crawl. Any­one who lives around South­east Texas prob­a­bly knows I-10 has been in a state of per­pet­ual con­struc­tion for quite awhile. This is true espe­cially in spots east of Hous­ton, such as at the Trin­ity River bridge, and between Beau­mont and the Texas-Louisiana border.

So I wasn’t very taken aback when I saw a sign that said: “Left Lane Closed.” I’m sure I mut­tered an exple­tive though. But what raised my con­cious­ness to the WTF? level was then see­ing a portable road sign indi­cat­ing traf­fic should move to the left. I thought: “Huh?” Now if the left lane was to be closed shouldn’t the traf­fic shift right rather than left?

Imag­ine how meta­gro­bi­lized I was when next I came across one traf­fic sign say­ing “Left Lane Closed” in the left lane and “Right Lane Closed” in the far right lane. Just how per­plexed this all left me is a lit­tle rem­i­nis­cent of the joke about a truck­load of the­sauruses crash­ing. “Peo­ple were aston­ished, bewil­dered, bewil­dered, blown away, bowled over, con­founded, dazed, dumb­founded, flab­ber­gasted, floored, over­whelmed, shocked, star­tled, stu­pe­fied and thunderstruck.”

Yes, it even blew my mind.

It seems like a “One Lane Road” sign would have been more explana­tory in this sit­u­a­tion. But there wasn’t one and I will even­tu­ally get over it.

Sacking Mac: No banana republic US

The sack­ing of Gen. Stan­ley McChrys­tal by Pres­i­dent Obama as com­man­der of inter­na­tional forces in Afghanistan was not the only choice the CINC could make. But even if one dis­agrees with the out­come it was clearly a right choice.

Gen. Stan­ley McChrys­tal receives tips from an Afghan gov­er­nor on grow­ing a beard once his days as an active duty gen­eral are over. That might not be too long.

McChrys­tal, and his entourage to a greater degree, shot off their mouths to an irrev­er­ent writer for a Rolling Stone piece. That arti­cle said some unflat­ter­ing things about Obama and his entourage. The rest is, of course, his­tory now as Obama accepted the general’s res­ig­na­tion — the age-old way of dis­miss­ing a top gen­eral — and has appointed Iraq surge archi­tect and cur­rent Cen­tral Com­mand leader Gen. David Petraeus.

Gen. David Petraeus, at mod­i­fied “parade rest.”

The man­ner in which Obama relieved the gen­eral and the way in which McChrys­tal han­dled his fir­ing was hon­or­able, which was to be expected in proper military-civil deco­rum. I would guess that some on the right, some on the left and even some in the mid­dle may have objected to the out­come. For those peo­ple, I would ask that they bear in mind that our mil­i­tary is con­sti­tu­tion­ally led by civil­ians. For top mil­i­tary lead­ers and their staff to make dis­parag­ing state­ments in pub­lic about their chain of com­mand is not only wrong-headed in the sense that it does not con­tribute to the well-oiled mil­i­tary machine, it is also illegal.

Any buck pri­vate or sea­man recruit should remem­ber the so-call “puni­tive arti­cles” of the Uni­form Code of Mil­i­tary Jus­tice. Those are the mil­i­tary laws for which one can be pun­ished by actions rang­ing from non-judicial pun­ish­ment to court mar­tial. Recruits are taught that when a mil­i­tary mem­ber disses a gov­ern­ment offi­cial, those offenses are seen as espe­cially heinous in the eyes of a mil­i­tary that prides itself on being dif­fer­ent from mil­i­tary jun­tas found in banana republics.

Tech­ni­cally, Gen. McChrys­tal could have or still could be charged with Arti­cle 88 of the UCMJ, which pro­hibits com­mis­sioned offi­cers from talk­ing smack about gov­ern­ment offi­cials. It doesn’t come with a very heavy sen­tence and I don’t know if any offi­cer has been con­victed of it in years. In the case of senior offi­cers such as McChrys­tal, he pretty much received the max being forced to fall on his sword, although it is yet to see what hap­pens to his career or if he will retire.

Enlisted and non-commissioned offi­cers have a sim­i­lar offense although it is one that might be dif­fi­cult to sus­tain in court these days as it falls under the so-called “catch-all” Arti­cle 134, a.k.a. the Gen­eral Arti­cle, to wit, as the “Man­ual for Courts Mar­tial” says quite frequently:

“Though not specif­i­cally men­tioned in this chap­ter, all dis­or­ders and neglects to the prej­u­dice of good order and dis­ci­pline in the armed forces, all con­duct of a nature to bring dis­credit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not cap­i­tal, of which per­sons sub­ject to this chap­ter may be guilty, shall be taken cog­nizance of by a gen­eral, spe­cial, or sum­mary court-martial, accord­ing to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be pun­ished at the dis­cre­tion of that court.”

Keep in mind this arti­cle takes in the kitchen sink from “Abus­ing Pub­lic Ani­mals” to wear­ing an unau­tho­rized badge or medal.

I read the offend­ing arti­cle in Rolling Stone and found it to be mostly flat­ter­ing for McChrys­tal. He is a rare “snake-eater” Spe­cial Oper­a­tions type who rose to the high­est ranks. He is well-liked by troops and is known for “lead­ing from the front.” I did not find many of the com­ments very offen­sive at all. But I can see how they were per­ceived as being over the top because they were directed at Obama and his peo­ple. The most damn­ing com­ment I saw was in a sub­ti­tle and I am not sure that came directly from McChrystal.

One also must remem­ber that some of history’s best gen­er­als have been every­thing from reck­less to insub­or­di­nate to down­right insane.

How­ever, our Con­sti­tu­tion takes prece­dence over one indi­vid­ual no mat­ter how good a fel­low he or she may be. I hope Petraeus does as well with Afghanistan as he appeared to do with Iraq. My only ques­tion is, will he also be han­dling duties as CENTCOM com­man­der simul­ta­ne­ously with his Afghan lead­er­ship role? If so, that could be a problem.

Fending off the oil while waiting for history to make

A lot of dif­fer­ent thoughts cloud my mind right now regard­ing the mas­sive Gulf of Mex­ico oil leak. Pri­mar­ily, I think we need to “stop the damn leak.” But that has proved to be some kind of difficult.

I am glad that the pun­dits and those who oppose the Pres­i­dent are so right and sure about mat­ters that they can lay every­thing at Obama’s feet. I feel his­tory will judge whether he acted swiftly enough and surely enough. I can’t help but think Obama is not only get­ting some bad advice, but has for quite some time received bad advice. I say that just tak­ing all in total. That too, how­ever, will only be judged by history.

The pun­dits have me pretty irked. This Newsweek arti­cle aptly tells how I feel about the pun­dits before and after the president’s speech on the oil spill. CNN made such a big deal about the broad­cast com­ing from the Oval Office and essen­tially com­pared the speech to other great events like Nixon’s res­ig­na­tion, Rea­gan talk­ing about the Space Shut­tle Challenger’s explo­sion and GW Bush speak­ing from the Oval after 9/11. To those on the Gulf Coast, this event is per­haps that momen­tous, but the pun­ditry just goes way over­board inter­pret­ing sym­bol­ism sometimes.

Finally, Texas Repub­li­can Rep. Joe Bar­ton made one of the most shame­ful remarks a leg­is­la­tor could make today when he apol­o­gized dur­ing a con­gres­sional hear­ing on the oil spill to BP CEO Tony Hayward.

Yes, the same Joe Bar­ton who has never met an energy com­pany exec­u­tive with a bag full of money he didn’t like had the gall to call the meet­ing between Obama and Hay­ward yes­ter­day in the White House “a shake­down.” Talk­ing about pot call­ing the ket­tle black. How many oil com­pany and elec­tric com­pany and nuclear power com­pany exec­u­tives have Joe Bar­ton shaken down over the years? Of course, if they got rid of all the hyp­ocrites in Con­gress most of the two cham­bers, includ­ing pretty much all the GOP sides, would be missing.

It gets a lit­tle old to see the con­gres­sional mem­bers get their lit­tle spot­light in which they can either light into the vil­lain of the day or else kiss their asses.

We shall see what we shall see. Too bad all those folks on the Gulf Coast have their lives hang­ing in the bal­ance while we wait on that which becomes history.

UPDATE: Bar­ton later apol­o­gized for the “mis­con­struc­tion” of his com­ments toward Hay­ward after appar­ently being threat­ened with the loss of a House com­mit­tee posi­tion by GOP lead­er­ship. The dress­ing down must have been with House Minor­ity Leader John Boehner hold­ing his nose. It seems the Ohio pol bought some $50,000 in BP stock just months before the explo­sion and sink­ing of the Deep­wa­ter Hori­zon rig from which the mas­sive oil spill began. On the other hand. Maybe Boehner was jeal­ous that he didn’t shake­down BP after its wealth spi­raled downward.

Rub a dub dub. Sharon Angle will need a super scrub.

Here comes the “scrub­bers.” These are the polit­i­cal pro­fes­sion­als who come in to scrub up the messier parts of a candidate’s life. I  don’t know if that’s what they are really called, but that is the job of many oper­a­tives when they have a can­di­date whose past or past state­ments are as messed up as soup sandwich.

The scrub­bers have a chal­lenge on their hand with Repub­li­can Sen­ate can­di­date Sharon Angle. The for­mer Nevada assem­bly­woman will face Sen­ate Major­ity Leader Harry Reid in the Gen­eral Election.

While many of those pro­mot­ing the Tea Party points of view have as of late sought to soften the nut­ti­ness in some of their kin­dred spir­its some of the nuts unfor­tu­nately make it out of their shell and gets them­selves into a real polit­i­cal race. Angle is one, the son of peren­nial pres­i­den­tial can­di­date Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, Dr. Rand Paul, is another.

Angle is going to take some extra scrub­bing with her desire to end Social Secu­rity noted in past state­ments as well as allud­ing to armed rebel­lion. With that lat­ter thought, if peo­ple — Democ­rats — weren’t so afraid of their shad­ows, they haul about half a thou­sand folks or so up before fed­eral courts on trea­son charges. Angle has also shown sym­pa­thy for the Church of Sci­en­tol­ogy. And the beat goes on

Good luck to our (Texas’) white-haired Sen. John Cornyn, who is head­ing the GOP’s National Sen­a­to­r­ial Com­mit­tee for this year’s elec­tions. He and the paid pro scrub­bers are going to be scrub­bing day and night. You know, of course, I’m kid­ding about wish­ing Cornyn good luck.

Stick it!

So what if he uses his toe?

Okay, I bet no one has thought of this yet as a solu­tion to plug­ging the run­away oil leak in the Gulf of Mex­ico: Find a lit­tle Dutch boy some 5,000 feet tall who can stick his lit­tle toe into the blowout pre­ven­ter or wher­ever the oil is com­ing from.

This is news. No really, it is!

Imag­ine your­self being a White House news cor­re­spon­dent. So many issues are on the plate of the pres­i­dent and of the nation and you get to report on those sto­ries: the Gulf oil spill, Israel, Afghanistan, Mex­ico, unem­ploy­ment, I could go on ad infini­tum.

None such sto­ries of the day are as impor­tant right now to those pam­pered pun­dits though. No, the No. 1 burn­ing ques­tion around the White House at the moment is who will get Helen Thomas’ chair?

If you will remem­ber, crotch­ety old Ms. Thomas resigned as a colum­nist with Hearst a few days ago because she said some PI (polit­i­cally incor­rect) things about Jews and Jerusalem.

Because the 89-year-old news hen (Thanks to Dan Jenk­ins’ mar­velous “Fast Copy”) was the longest-serving mem­ber of the Wash­ing­ton press corps she was awarded with the seat in the mid­dle of the first row, directly in front of the podium. (And I always thought she sat there because she was too short.)

Fox News sup­pos­edly wants it. I sup­pose their cor­re­spon­dents can­not aptly insult the pres­i­dent or his flacks with­out see­ing them close up.

That’s fine with me if Fox gets the vaunted chair. In fact, I really don’t give a damn who gets the chair. I remem­ber cov­er­ing pres­i­den­tial events in Craw­ford as a “local pool” mem­ber. We weren’t sup­posed to touch the catered break­fast wor­thy of a five-star New York hotel although I some­time did any­way. And in the White House press room, the sup­posed crème de la crème of the nation’s jour­nal­ist worry about who is going to get the chair. After their rich break­fast of course.

All the great food you can eat, a good seat in the brief­ing room and just tons of self-importance too. What more could a jour­nal­ist ask for?

Big D:” It Ain’t Just a Big City in Texas

One of my “gram­mar school” teach­ers once told me not to use the word “ain’t.”

Ain’t is a vul­gar word,” she said.

Too bad she didn’t see me after a year at sea in the Navy. I think I used the “F-word” for every part of speech. I real­ized how bad it had pro­gressed when I was talk­ing a mile-a-minute to my mother and let a “F” slip before I knew what hap­pened. I just kept talk­ing, though with a red face, and my mother never said a word. She was prob­a­bly used to this phe­nom since her hus­band, my Dad, had been a mer­chant sea­man, and two of my older broth­ers also spent time on ships in the Navy.

But I’m not here to talk about cussing or even vul­gar words, depend­ing on how one looks at words. No, I am here to talk about dia­betes, or what I refer to as the “Big D.”

It has been a cou­ple of months since I was diag­nosed with Type II dia­betes. I guess I was pretty much in denial until the neu­rol­o­gist I have been see­ing because of foot and back pain men­tioned a cou­ple of weeks ago that “Dia­betes is a pretty nasty disease.”

On TV shows you see peo­ple, espe­cially in years past, act as if they’ve been told they have the plague when­ever they’re told they have dia­betes. They act as if they’ve been given a death sen­tence. Well, maybe they have and maybe they haven’t. If you aren’t scared enough of dia­betes, check this out from the “2007 National Dia­betes Fact Sheet” from the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Control:

–Dia­betes was the sev­enth lead­ing cause of death listed on U.S. death cer­tifi­cates in 2006.

–The risk for stroke is 2 to 4 times higher among peo­ple with diabetes.

–Dia­betes is the lead­ing cause of new cases of blind­ness among adults aged 20–74 years.

–Dia­betes is the lead­ing cause of kid­ney fail­ure, account­ing for 44% of new cases in 2005.

–Almost 30% of peo­ple with dia­betes aged 40 years or older have impaired sen­sa­tion in the feet (i.e., at least one area that lacks feeling).

–More than 60% of non­trau­matic lower-limb ampu­ta­tions occur in peo­ple with diabetes.

–Esti­mated dia­betes cost in the U.S. (direct and indi­rect) in 2007: $174 billion

Are you scared yet? Well, those are kind of scary fig­ures. I am one of those 30 per­cent of peo­ple with dia­betes aged 40 and older who have impaired sen­sa­tion in their feet. So, we tend to get freaked out about our feet and our eyes and our skin. If it’s not one thing it’s another.

Yes, if it isn’t one thing it’s another. If you have this dis­ease, and it is a dis­ease, you have to think that if it isn’t one thing it’s another to keep things in per­spec­tive. You do all you can do just to live and then you do a lit­tle more. Some­times you slip. Some­times you go on. You get hit by a truck. Some­times you go on.

It is a nasty dis­ease, Doc­tor. And I’m sure “ain’t” was a nasty word 40-some-odd years ago to my old-fashioned gram­mar school teacher. But the world is filled with some big nas­ties. And we just go on. We try to keep our feet clean. We try not get scratches and burns, like I have on my legs from stu­pid mishaps. We try to eat right. We poke our­selves to make our fin­gers bleed and check our sugar lev­els. We take our meds or our insulin. We exer­cise if we are able. We do all we are sup­posed to do. Some­times we slip.

Then we go on about our busi­ness of living.