Barton not the lone ranger. House group including E. Texas reps bemoan a “Chicago-style” shakedown

Oh this is rich.

I found this press release by a con­gres­sional cau­cus of right-wingers. Among them are Joe Bar­ton, but also are most, if not all, of the Lone Star State’s GOP House members.

The Repub­li­can Study Com­mit­tee called the fund agreed to by Pres­i­dent Obama and BP chief Tony Hay­ward “a Chicago-style shake­down.” I have yet to see any apol­ogy from this cau­cus. Even more rich, I’ve not seen any apolo­gies from our own East Texas con­gres­sional mem­bers. Among these mem­bers are Rep. Ted Poe, whose dis­trict includes the Upper Texas Coast and part of the Hous­ton metro area; Rep. Kevin Brady, who rep­re­sents the heart of East Texas; and Rep. Louie Gohmert, the con­gress­man for the north­ern por­tion of East Texas.

I haven’t heard any­one men­tion this yet, but it looks like Bar­ton wasn’t the lone idiot in sug­gest­ing BP were vic­tims of extor­tion by our government.

Bow-wow-gate: The Japanese view

There he goes again! One wonders if the U.S. right-wing will lambast President Obama for what appears to be a bow to a child of U.S. Embassy workers in Tokyo. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

There he goes again! One won­ders if the U.S. right-wing will fusti­gate Pres­i­dent Obama for what appears to be a bow to a child of U.S. Embassy work­ers in Tokyo. (Offi­cial White House Photo by Pete Souza)

 My col­lege friend and some­times IT guru, Paul, offers via e-mail a bit of Japan­ese per­spec­tive in wake of “The Bow Heard Round the World.” I face­tiously speak of the uproar over Pres­i­dent Obama bow­ing to the Japan­ese Emperor dur­ing the former’s offi­cial visit ear­lier this week. Paul lives in Tokyo where he has taught Eng­lish for a num­ber of years. He is an astute observer of his sur­round­ings per­haps either because of or despite — per­haps a bit of both — the jour­nal­ism classes he and I had together at Stephen F. Austin State Uni­ver­sity. I still think the name of the insti­tu­tion should be short­ened to “Steve.”

 Paul observes that the left­ists in Japan, who object to the Impe­r­ial sys­tem, are the ones both­ered by Obama’s bow to the Emperor as com­pared to the Amer­i­can right-wing who are ticked off because they con­tend the pres­i­dent is being servile.

 My opin­ion, of course, is that any­thing Obama does pisses off the right wing. I used the old adage in response to Paul about the mat­ter:  “Some peo­ple would com­plain if they had a loaf of bread under each arm.”**

 Paul also points out that the Japan­ese left sees the Obama bow as “giv­ing sup­port to an out­dated and super­sti­tious system” although the Japan­ese on the street sup­port Obama and “can’t under­stand what the big deal is.”

 The Japan­ese view the bow as a hand­shake and con­trary to what Amer­i­cans might think is not wit­nessed that much in Japan nowa­days, accord­ing to Paul.

 “The Japan­ese don’t care if (Americans) do (the bow) because we always f**k it up,” Paul said. “It’s a Japan­ese thing. They are pleased to take the cul­tural first dance to prac­tice the handshake.”

 Given that a seem­ingly small por­tion of Japan­ese left­ists have their nose out of joint, the clamor over a bow­ing Obama is just a whole trunk load o’ noth­ing that the Amer­i­can right-wing class can use to get a few days of media. Okay, you got it. Now move on to the next ridicu­lous mat­ter you can find to crit­i­cize Obama and the Democrats.

 It all is just mean­ing­less dri­vel from peo­ple whose point of view becomes increas­ingly less rel­e­vant in a soci­ety that has tired of all the bulls**t.

**I’m not cer­tain where this say­ing orig­i­nated although I have heard it most of my life. I’ve also heard the vari­a­tion “pig under one arm and a loaf of bread under the other.” Both apho­risms, or plat­i­tudes if you pre­fer,” would nicely fit the Great Depres­sion era. Or per­haps, for some, the say­ings might work these days.

The opposition proves they are right silly

 If the “loyal” oppo­si­tion to the cur­rent rul­ing party in U.S. gov­ern­ment is seri­ous about any­thing, any­thing at all, then per­haps they should start act­ing like it. Make that, they should start act­ing like adults.

 After rais­ing Hell about the administration’s right­ful pre­rog­a­tive to have alleged ter­ror­ists tried in New York where the 9/11 hor­ror hap­pened, the right now blath­ers about the president’s bow to the Japan­ese emperor.

 I didn’t like George W. Bush. But I don’t think his ene­mies attacked every breath he took, every move he made, every fart he pro­duced. I think the “loyal” (allegedly loyal) oppo­si­tion needs to get a life, or per­haps just shut the f**k up.

Don’t judge an unsolicited opinion by its deliverer

The idiom “Don’t judge a book by its cover” has been around in one form or another for prob­a­bly, well, let’s just say a very long time.

Nonethe­less, if the adage is cliche to one or the other then all I can do is pro­vide a response with an acronymn, delivered in the pho­netic alpha­bet, kind of like you hear fighter pilots do in movies. My pho­netic mes­sage is: “SIERRA, ALPHA, TANGO, SIERRA,” which is short for “sorry about that s**t. In other words, don’t judge a book by its cover suits my needs inso­far as this — hope­fully — short post exists.

I stopped to talk with a neigh­bor upon return­ing from the store. After a few words or so, he launched into a dis­course about how the elec­tions in Vir­ginia and New Jer­sey today should tell the tale of just how screwed up that blankety-blank Obama is doing.

Now I wrote a line or two about this yes­ter­day say­ing I don’t think these few scat­tered elec­tions are going to tell any­thing about how Obama is doing in office, the state of the Democ­rats or the future for the divi­sions within the Repub­li­can party. So, I told my neigh­bor I didn’t think the elec­tions will mat­ter one damn bit except in those states. He went just right along with his rant.

I have never dis­cussed pol­i­tics with my neigh­bor. He prob­a­bly doesn’t even know I blog or have what some refer to as a “lib­eral” blog. I don’t par­tic­u­larly see EFD that way, but what­ever works. I am a lib­eral in the good sense, but mostly a mod­er­ate and con­ser­v­a­tive on other mat­ters and even lib­er­tar­ian on still oth­ers. The neighbor’s take on mat­ters is rather obvi­ous, a “watch Fox News all-the-time ultra con­ser­v­a­tive Repub­li­can.” This is obvi­ous because he spouts the party line every time I see him.

What puz­zles me is why he thinks I would like to hear his, mostly wrong, polit­i­cal opin­ion. Is it because I look like a red­neck? I get along with some of the red­necks who live around here. I don’t get along with some of the crack­heads. So is that why my neigh­bor tar­gets me as a Limbaugh-boostin’ Obama hater?

The same hap­pens when I am in the wait­ing room at the VA clinic. Some guy wear­ing a World War II GI-rene vet­eran ball cap — thank him for his ser­vice — comes in and starts blast­ing away at how Obama is ruin­ing this uni­verse, not to men­tion the Corps, Sem­per Fi! Of course, at the VA you’re liable to get some long-hair guy wear­ing a biker’s vest with Viet­nam vet­eran patches who either starts say­ing the same type of thing, or else he goes off on the Repub­li­cans, which he blames all the way back to Dick Nixon.

Surely it isn’t just me. My past men­tal health coun­selor labeled me as  hav­ing a nar­cis­sis­tic per­son­al­ity dis­or­der, so that state­ment should be a sign of progress, yes? Well, per­haps not. The point is, why do peo­ple who you really don’t know that well or at all approach you and unload upon you with their opin­ions — or the opin­ions of Glenn Beck, Sean Han­nity, Lim­baugh and Fox News?

The same goes for reli­gion. I don’t mind hav­ing a ratio­nal dis­cus­sion about reli­gion but I don’t like peo­ple who get in my face and tell me I’m going to Hell when in fact they don’t know me well enough to know where I might be going. Ned­er­land, Texas, for instance. I have had very civil dis­cus­sions about reli­gion with Mor­mon mis­sion­ar­ies who neatly parked their bikes out­side my place and were extremely polite. They even gave me a Book of Mor­mon, which I have somewhere.

But I am get­ting out of the octa­gon here. Peo­ple approach­ing me about reli­gion, I think, would be less likely based on how I look than pol­i­tics. The truth  is, though, I have to think that a good many peo­ple who give me their polit­i­cal out­look unso­licited do it because, well, I’m not sure why they do it. I guess the weather became to passé.

Some prob­a­bly do see in me the look of a Limbaugh-Palin con­ser­v­a­tive: Shaved head, over­weight, unhappy look­ing most of the time (although that is from chronic pain and not from fig­u­ra­tive pains in the ass), known to wear ball caps with the Hous­ton Astros logo. There you go.

If that be the case, then I wish peo­ple would cease and desist. Stop judg­ing this book by its cover, or what­ever the hell else it is that’s wrong with you!

scuse me for mo Moammar

  Isn’t two days of Moam­mar Gad­hafi a lit­tle much?

  Well, maybe it is but I didn’t get enough sleep last night — per­haps sub­con­sciously wor­ried I might have night­mares about the Libyan strong man throw­ing things at me — so I am tired and thus want to make this short.

  But really, who would have thought that Gad­hafi would have pro­vided so much comic relief with his 90-some-odd-minute-mind-numbing-speech at the UN Gen­eral Assem­bly. I mean, the guy wore out an interpreter.

   One of the fun­ni­est com­ments I heard over the Gad­hafi speech: “Where is Kanye West when you need him?”

Pitch this Moammar!

Libyan leader Moam­mar Gad­hafi is like a bad penny. He just never seems to go away. At today’s United Nations Gen­eral Assem­bly he was up at the podium blast­ing the UN Secu­rity Coun­cil for … some­thing. Truth be told, it was kind of hard fol­low­ing what he said, even with trans­la­tors speak­ing per­fectly good Eng­lish. Gad­hafi also has cre­ated a stir around New York try­ing to find a place to pitch his tent. Don­ald Trump has come up with a place. Of course, a lot of peo­ple would just as soon he pitch his tent in the mid­dle of the Atlantic Ocean, while oth­ers feel Hell would be just the right spot for him.

At least I influenced one person.

 Only hours after my anger inspired a boy­cott against all things South Car­olina over the “You Lie” out­burst by Idiot Joe Wil­son I imme­di­ately real­ized I had just writ­ten out for all to read another of my bone­head ideas.

 Per­haps instead, I thought, those of us ticked over such a mon­u­men­tal expres­sion of dis­re­spect against our gov­ern­ment, our pres­i­dent and our polit­i­cal sys­tem should meet the wingnuts with the same coarse­ness that they are spread­ing with some seem­ing suc­cess. Maybe those of us should go to the tea par­ties and town­hall and other reac­tionary gath­er­ings where every utter­ance by our oppo­nents can be shouted down by our own out­cry: “BULLSHIT!”

I think,” says Rep. “Left Foot Bubba” Tinger­hop­per, R-Backwater, S.C., “There­fore, I am.”

 “BULLSHIT,” says we.

 Well, maybe not, for it seems my idea of a boy­cott was a good one.

 I am sure it wasn’t my idea that did the trick. But even though I did sug­gest boy­cotting cer­tain aspects of the South Car­olina econ­omy — tourism for instance — there might at least be some like minds out there.

 McLatchy News­pa­pers reported yes­ter­day that state and local tourism offi­cials in South Car­olina are being “flooded by emails and calls from peo­ple across the coun­try, say­ing they won’t vaca­tion in South Car­olina” due to Wilson’s charge dur­ing a joint ses­sion of Con­gress that the pres­i­dent lied.

 South Car­olina is home to a num­ber of well-known tourist des­ti­na­tions includ­ing Myr­tle Beach and Hilton Head.

 Even some­what more bizarre, at least as far as this blog is con­cerned, I got an e-mail mes­sage con­cern­ing the boy­cott topic from a com­plete unknown. That is kind of unusual, espe­cially these days since I switched to Word Press from Blog­ger. I seem to have lost some of my read­ers, not that I ever had many other than friends or rel­a­tives, most of whom are very tol­er­ant peo­ple to be mostly con­ser­v­a­tives who put up with or at least suf­fer in silence with my point of view.

 Sherry, from some­where, e-mailed me:

 “You influ­enced me. 
 
My ances­tors spent a cou­ple gen­er­a­tions in SC the first part of the 18th cen­tury.
 
I want to be proud of that and I said so in my let­ter to the tourism site.
 
How about a Boy­cott South Car­olina face­book site?”
 
 Why not?
 I pointed out to Sherry that many of my ances­tors came from North Car­olina. So
I sup­pose some­one will fig­ure out that is the ori­gin of my churlishness.
 “Yep, damn Yan­kee. Just like I figgered.”

Advertisers just say no to Glenn Beck

 It is nice to see that some large cor­po­ra­tions still respond to the wishes of the consumer.

 Sev­eral spon­sors of the Fox News show “Glenn Beck” have announced they are pulling their adver­tise­ments in the wake of the host’s remarks that Pres­i­dent Obama is racist.

 Beck, not to be con­fused with the one-named singer Beck, said on another Fox show that Obama is a “racist” and has a “deep-seated hatred for white peo­ple.” Obama, not be con­fused with an Irish bar­tender, replied that Beck was a “hor­ri­ble bas­ket­ball player” and “can’t dance for diddly.”  

  The adver­tis­ers which include Geico, Sar­gento, Proc­tor and Gam­ble, the Phizer phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal company, Kraft Foods and Pro­gres­sive Insur­ance did not remove their com­mer­cials from the Fox News net­work. Thus the Rupert Mur­doch Repub­li­can Party’s Right Wing Hate Machine net­work as it is also known stands to lose no money from sponsors.

 A black polit­i­cal coali­tion, ColorofChange.org, launched the drive for spon­sors yank­ing their ads from Beck’s show. The linked “The New York Times” arti­cle describes Beck also as a “con­ser­v­a­tive radio host and come­dian.” That descrip­tion is itself funny because Beck has all the humor of Hein­rich Himm­ler on a bad day.

 Speak­ing of con­cen­tra­tion camps, Beck said in recent months that FEMA was build­ing con­cen­tra­tion camps for Repub­li­cans and other Obama oppo­nents. The rumor was later debunked on his own show. Too bad the same can’t be done for Sarah Palin’s “Death Pan­els.”

Media melodrama: Push this back

For­mer Alaska Gov. Sarah “Cari­bou Bar­bie” Palin con­tin­ues her reign of stu­pid­ity in Amer­i­can cul­ture by her remarks over the week­end that the president’s health care reform would result in “death pan­els” to decide who lives or dies.

The ex-leader and failed Repub­li­can vice pres­i­den­tial can­di­date later backed off and asked for “restraint,” per­haps because folks in her own party were call­ing her con­tentions “nuts.”

Per­haps what is worse than the moronic expres­sions and down­right silli­ness com­ing from those who are basi­cally shills for big cor­po­ra­tions who oppose health reform is that national media cov­er­age of it all has received so much play.

If it could be proven that the anger we see each day on TV at town­halls is gen­uine as opposed to man­u­fac­tured, or Astro­turf, then the over­whelm­ing media cov­er­age would be war­ranted. But I think enough doubt and enough evi­dence has been raised that these shout­ing matches that pass for civic dis­course is largely a tac­tic by big busi­ness and the Repub­li­can estab­lish­ment to scare and whip oppo­si­tion for health reform into a frenzy.

It would seem after being used to gain pub­lic sup­port for an unnec­es­sary war in Iraq that the media would get it.

So much of what one sees today in, at least the national media, is polit­i­cal con­flict. That seems all that mat­ters to news pro­duc­ers and edi­tors in these national news­rooms. It is like Wash­ing­ton Post media critic Howard Kurtz observed in a WP online chat yes­ter­day when he said that the media likes to “keep stir­ring the pot and reduc­ing every­thing to melodrama.”

Is the media in such cov­er­age these days reflect­ing what the pub­lic wants to hear or are they mold­ing the mes­sage to keep stir­ring the pot and turn­ing the news into soap opera fodder?

That’s what it all seems like some­times to me and I wish the media would stop it. And stop it right now! Cover the news, damn it. If I want soap operas I will watch “One Life to Live” or read about the Palin family.

And while you are at it, will you all in the national media and on cable chan­nels quit using the gra­tu­itous use of the word “push­back.” Yes, it is a real word and in most cases the mean­ing is being used some­what in a cor­rect fash­ion. But it is a buzz­word and buzz­words get old in a hurry, espe­cially if they aren’t funny.

What goes well with a fine Alaskan whine?

One would think for all the tough talk that some of this nation’s Repub­li­can lead­ers can blow out their wazoos that they would have skin like their mas­cot elephant’s.

That doesn’t seem to be the case though.

I saw the over­sen­si­tiv­ity of George W. Bush in per­son and on tele­vi­sion many a time, espe­cially when I cov­ered his Texas guber­na­to­r­ial press conferences.

Ultra-conservative pun­dit and de facto GOP leader Rush Lim­baugh has made his whole radio per­sona based on his inabil­ity to take criticism.

And it seems that since the time she was nom­i­nated as Repub­li­can vice pres­i­den­tial can­di­date up until the present, Gov. Sarah Palin has become that quin­tes­sen­tial Alaskan whine.

At every step Palin — whose PR built her as a rough-and-tumble jock, hockey mom and wilder­ness out­door­swoman — has found a tar­get for blame when her sit­u­a­tion went awry. Pri­mar­ily her tar­get has been the media although she has found oth­ers on which she could play the vic­tim such as the spat between her and David Let­ter­man over a crude joke the lat­ter made and later apologized.

Now that Palin is leav­ing office, she has threatned sev­eral blogs as well as MSNBC and The Wash­ing­ton Post with defama­tion law­suits over the pos­si­bililty her res­ig­na­tion might have been con­nected to ethics inves­ti­ga­tions. I thought Con­ser­v­a­tives were against friv­ilous litigation.

Even with Palin leav­ing office it would seem her vic­tory in spe­cious defama­tion suits would be highly unlikely even though it could prove expen­sive for plain­tiffs, at least in the beginning.

One has to believe that some of those ultra-conservative Repub­li­cans who talk tough and feel the solu­tion to any prob­lem is dis­solv­ing taxes and gov­ern­ment while unleash­ing nuclear bombs on our real or per­ceived ene­mies suf­fer from a bad case of the “Can Dish It Out But Can’t Take Its.”

Of course, I’m no polit­i­cal con­sul­tant or expert. I’m just a guy artic­u­lat­ing my opin­ion out loud, and mostly to myself. But if I had any advice for some of the Sarah Palins in the world who feel blam­ing oth­ers increases their own stature, it would be this: Please don’t utter any lines urg­ing oth­ers to buck up and take per­sonal responsibility.  We are used to hypocrisy in gov­ern­ment, espe­cially by your ilk, but some­times you can only take too much of a good thing so far.