Enjoy Letterman blackmail story while you can

Like prob­a­bly mil­lions of other busy­bod­ies I am, at the moment, caught up in the whole David Let­ter­man scan­dal. My inter­est is that it is a com­pelling story involv­ing a high-dollar black­mail plot against a very unique enter­tainer whom I hap­pen to like.

Also grab­bing my atten­tion is the fact that the guy who allegedly tried to extort $2 mil­lion out of Let­ter­man over the star hav­ing sex with co-workers, Robert Halde­man, is him­self an Emmy-winning tele­vi­sion pro­ducer. Infor­ma­tion from an arrest war­rant for the man also says that the sus­pect lived at one time with one of the women with whom Let­ter­man was hav­ing an affair. That woman, Stephanie Birkitt, has been seen many times on “Late Night With David Let­ter­man.” Birkitt — who hosted Win­ter Olympic cov­er­age on the show in 2002 and 2006,  is not accused of any crimes. It appears just to be a pawn in the alleged blackmail.

I have no feel­ings one way or the other about any who are involved in this saga, at least from the stand­point of their involve­ment or non-involvement. I think Let­ter­man was smart to get out in front of this. I always thought Birkitt was cute and funny cast as a faux air­head. I actu­ally thought she would one day go some­where in show business.

The prob­lem with this type of story is we will get sick of it because it will be cussed and dis­cussed ad nau­seum as the media has a propen­sity for dead horse beat­ing. The rea­son is that the media, in most cases cor­rectly, assumes the pub­lic always wants more of a great story espe­cially one involv­ing celebri­ties. Another fac­tor is that the media is lazy. It is eas­ier to con­tinue milk­ing a story for every last drop than crawl­ing around out in the trenches look­ing for news.

So I guess I will enjoy the story until it starts get­ting on my nerves. When it comes to news, one must know when to say when.

See the USA as a small-town journalist.

Some­times I like to head for places I never been or never even heard of and see what’s mak­ing the news there. It’s not that I like to make fun of small-town news. As I have men­tioned here before I was a small-town news­man. Some peo­ple might call all the papers at which I once worked small-town news­pa­pers. Most were, although three were dailies and the last one I worked for on a full-time basis was a medium-sized news­pa­per. My first job, though was edi­tor of a daily that had a cir­cu­la­tion of about 1,200. I was chief cook and bot­tle­washer, as my Dad used to say.

Reporters and edi­tors, sales peo­ple, print­ers, cir­cu­la­tion man­agers, deliv­ery folks, all those good salt o’ the Earth peo­ple who ply their trade for news­pa­pers in small towns see news up close and per­sonal. The peo­ple who are vic­tims of car wrecks are their neigh­bors, peo­ple in their churches, the water rates raised by the town coun­cil affect the reporter and the edi­tor, and of course, foot­ball ties the town together until a los­ing coach tears the town apart. So off we go to the hin­ter­land and see what is hap­pen­ing among the salt o’ the Earth:

It’s prob­a­bly not a moun­tain lion in Nebraska. Chris Dunker, staff writer of the “Beat­rice Daily Sun” in Nebraska, gives a pretty exten­sive look at whether a big ani­mal peo­ple have seen around those parts is a moun­tain lion, coy­ote or just your run-of-the-mill uniden­ti­fied big-ass ani­mal. (UBAA, I guess.)

It ain’t heavy, it’s our neigh­bor­hood moose calf. Another ani­mal story. This you have to expect in Alaska, unless Sarah Palin is around. Then you have to expect a dead ani­mal story. Some neigh­bors in Mud Bay got together to res­cue a moose calf from a pond, accord­ing to the “Chilkat Val­ley News.” Their motto is: “Serv­ing Haines and Kluk­wan since 1966.” And now the can add the lower Sabine-Neches Val­ley of South­east Texas. Or not.

This might sound obscene but it’s not. You expect the quaint from Ver­mont. But some­how this head­line from an arti­cle writ­ten by Stephanie M. Peters in the “Rut­land Her­ald” (Oh stop it! We haven’t even made it to the head­line yet,) which is: “County phi­lat­e­lists pull out of state fair.” Rut­land was the only place I vis­ited in Ver­mont. Nice place, but I won­der if the stamp enthu­si­asts will go to a place more hos­pitable to their phi­lat­el­ing. Maybe Albany or Stockbridge.

Oh no! It’s a … it’s a … empty box. The Hoover (Alabama) police bomb squad was called to inves­ti­gate a sus­pi­cious con­tainer that two men in an SUV dropped off in a Food World gro­cery store park­ing lot in Pel­ham, Ala. Food World employ­ees thought the men’s activ­i­ties were sus­pi­cious, as did the Pel­ham police chief, thus the bomb experts from the nearby big­ger city (Hoover, about 70,000 peo­ple) were sum­moned. It turned out to be an empty stor­age box. There was no indi­ca­tion, accord­ing to the “Shelby County Reporter” in Columbiana, whether any lit­ter­ing charges are pending.

Finally, the police beat or blot­ter or what­ever has long been a high-interest sec­tion of many news­pa­pers. The lit­tle briefs vary from place-to-place. I wrote the briefs at sev­eral news­pa­pers and I can attest to the fact they are well read. Some places, where they are still able to pull it off, have a rather humor­ous take on the police beat or at least a funny head­line or two. Peo­ple seem to get ticked off about the least lit­tle thing and since humor seems lost among the right­eous bas­tards more and more funny will likely dis­ap­pear. But as long as we can still enjoy it, have fun with the Cops brief head­lines from one of my favorite news­pa­pers (or at least with a few of my favorite news­pa­per folks) “The Daily Sen­tinel” in Nacog­doches, Texas. I will let you read the briefs your ownself.

“How is this my fault? I didn’t put the road here?”

“How I am I going to get extra mints on my pil­low now?”

“Fine you can play through.”

Ah such fun. But I don’t miss count­ing head­lines, hot wax, car wrecks at 2 p.m.  on the road next to the big oak by the Johnson’s in Podunk, writ­ing 15 sto­ries a week, elec­tion night pizza, school board exec­u­tive ses­sions until 2 a.m., “Grip and Grin,” and finally, “Oh, I think I know a lit­tle about jour­nal­ism. I took a jour­nal­ism class in 1) high school 2) col­lege 3) high school and college.”

But I tell you young whip­pah snap­pahs out there who aspire to great­ness in jour­nal­ism, think big by think­ing lit­tle. If you want to learn about jour­nal­ism, learn about peo­ple. If you want to learn about peo­ple, go get your­self down to Podunk, get a job as a reporter or edi­tor of the weekly, and learn jour­nal­ism. And don’t worry, you won’t starve, the Lion’s Club always got good food as does most Rotary Clubs. Con­flict of Inter­est? Ethics vio­la­tions? If you can be bought off with a chicken-fried steak, you cer­tainly don’t need to be a journalist.

Tease this!

While I admit to a long list of annoy­ances and petty griev­ances some­thing that does exces­sively steam my clams is the news show “tease.” I speak of the lit­tle announce­ment and video clip that one expects, or at least hopes, will pre­cede a news report.

When such a tease is given prior to a com­mer­cial there is an expec­ta­tion that some­time soon after the pro­gram returns the report that was teased will play. But so often, the report will not return in the seg­ment fol­low­ing a com­mer­cial and yet another tease will pre­cede another com­mer­cial and at times even another sequence of tease-commercial will ensue.

Now it is easy to under­stand that a tease is used to entice view­ers to con­tinue watch­ing the news pro­gram. How­ever, it seems to me that if the teased piece isn’t shown after the first tease-commercial that these folks are just jerk­ing me around. I usu­ally say “to hell with it.” I did today stay, because of my inter­est, this after­noon watch­ing two tease-commercial sequences.

This was on CNN’s “Sit­u­a­tion Room” with Wolf Blitzer. The tease in ques­tion was for a video in which an Okla­homa state trooper pulled over an ambu­lance because its dri­ver allegedly failed to yield right of way. The ambu­lance was car­ry­ing a patient to a hos­pi­tal although the vehi­cle was not run­ning with lights and siren.

In the video, the para­medic super­vi­sor who was rid­ing in back got out after the trooper pulled over the ambu­lance dri­ver and an argu­ment began between the cop and the para­medic. The trooper took a bel­liger­ent tone through­out the traf­fic stop, almost imme­di­ately cussing the ambu­lance oper­a­tor for not let­ting him pass, and later the fam­ily of the woman being trans­ported came up on the scene. A scuf­fle involv­ing the para­medic and the trooper briefly took place. The trooper finally let the EMTs con­tinue to the hos­pi­tal where he issued the dri­ver a warn­ing. The local DA declined to file charges.

Not know­ing what the patient was being taken to the hos­pi­tal for it isn’t totally easy to judge the out­come. My feel­ings — pro­vided the delay didn’t cause the patient any undue stress or endan­ger her — is all’s well that ends well.

My opin­ion, informed as it is inas­much as my past expe­ri­ence in emer­gency care includes time as an EMT, is that oper­a­tors of emer­gency vehi­cles are bound by the law to fol­low traf­fic reg­u­la­tions even dur­ing dire cir­cum­stances. Hav­ing not seen what all took place pre­cip­i­tat­ing the stop, I can’t say if the ambu­lance in ques­tion actu­ally broke any laws.

Just because an emer­gency vehi­cle isn’t run­ning lights and sirens doesn’t nec­es­sar­ily mean the auto isn’t “run­ning hot” or on an emer­gency run. To give one exam­ple, an ambu­lance might not use a siren while tak­ing a per­son with chest pains to the hos­pi­tal in order to lessen the chance a patient will be scared even more than they already are. They prob­a­bly should use emer­gency lights in such a case though. Also, a police unit might not use lights and sirens in some sit­u­a­tions such as approach­ing on a crime in progress.

It does seem both the trooper and the rid­ing para­medic went way more off the reser­va­tion (par­don the pun since the ambu­lance appar­ently belonged to the Creek Nation)and could have acted more pro­fes­sion­ally. They could have harmed the patient and they obvi­ously dam­aged their pub­lic posture.

As for Wolf Blitzer, quit being cute with your teases.

Newspapers lacking passion, says WP columnist

Dan Froomkin, whose White House Watch col­umn appears on washingtonpost.com, penned a thought­ful piece for the Nie­man Jour­nal­ism Lab express­ing the need for more pas­sion in Amer­i­can newspapers.

Pas­sion seems like a funny word to bandy about in con­nec­tion with news­pa­pers. That is, it is a rather odd asso­ci­a­tion unless your expe­ri­ence with news­pa­pers has only con­sisted of con­sum­ing the news. For many, though not all, who have toiled in some aspect of cre­at­ing the beast that some­times the final news prod­uct can be pas­sion is a dri­ving force that pro­duces con­scious con­sid­er­a­tion much less than that of a paycheck.

The prob­lem with news­pa­pers today, says Froomkin, is news­pa­pers “play it too safe.”

“We need to come to terms with the fact that one rea­son we’re hav­ing such a tough time is that we are still fun­da­men­tally fail­ing to deliver the value of our news­room to Inter­net users,” he said.

What jour­nal­ists do and are, and what Inter­net read­ers desire, is no dif­fer­ent now than it has been way before the Inter­net arrived — at least as core prin­ci­ples are con­cerned. As Froomkin points out papers are more hin­dered than helped by a for­mat that had more value in days past — the notion of objec­tiv­ity orig­i­nally used to bring in a wider read­er­ship is a good exam­ple he uses.

Froomkin said that the Inter­net does not work on a daily sched­ule and “abhors the absence of voice.”

“If we were to start an online news­pa­per from scratch today, we’d rec­og­nize that tone­less, small-bore news sto­ries are not the way to build a large audi­ence — not even with “inter­ac­tive” bells and whis­tles cob­bled on top,” Froomkin said. “One option might be to imi­tate cable TV, and engage in a furi­ous vol­ume of he-said/she-said report­ing, voyeurism, con­trar­i­an­ism, gos­sip, triv­i­al­ity and gotcha jour­nal­ism. But that would come at the cost of our souls. The right way to rein­vent our­selves online would be to do pre­cisely what jour­nal­ists were put on this green earth to do: Seek the truth, hold the pow­er­ful account­able, expose the B.S., explain how things really work, intro­duce peo­ple to each other, and tell com­pelling sto­ries. And we should do all those things pas­sion­ately and coura­geously — not hid­ing who we are, but rather engag­ing in a very pub­lic expres­sion of our jour­nal­is­tic values.”

Some of the above is already done, Froomkin said. How­ever, too often the pow­ers that be obscure great sto­ries in what he calls a “pseudo-neutrality” as well as other per­ceived sins such as news­pa­pers flee­ing from tone like lawyers run­ning from Dick Cheney with a shotgun.

Per­haps a more sim­plis­tic notion would be that news­pa­pers have been cor­nered by their own suc­cesses now that the imme­di­acy and so-called “all the news all the time” of the Inter­net and Cable TV has made news (almost — I don’t think it’s com­pletely there yet) a 24/7 phenomenon.

It’s like I was telling a friend with whom I had lunch today if I could only find a way to make money with the Inter­net … The same goes for those news­pa­pers left stand­ing to deliver a news prod­uct for a new fron­tier. To be or not to be may be the ques­tion but money is the answer.