Monthly Archives: July 2009

New GI Bill a positive step, but bargain?

The Depart­ment of Vet­er­ans Affairs will begin pro­cess­ing pay­ments tomor­row for the new Post-9/11 GI Bill. The new vet­er­ans bill was designed to aug­ment cur­rent vet­er­ans ben­e­fits such as those found in the Mont­gomery GI Bill, which was a de facto post-Vietnam era bill. Vet­er­ans will also have the abil­ity to trans­fer ben­e­fits to fam­ily mem­bers under the legislation.

The improved ben­e­fits are expected to help nearly a half-million vet­er­ans and their fam­i­lies attend col­lege next year alone. Almost $80 bil­lion for these ben­e­fits will be paid out dur­ing the next decade.

I am happy to see an improved GI Bill to help the younger vet­er­ans and their fam­i­lies. Still, I can’t help but think this crop of vet­er­ans are get­ting shafted com­pared with what I had for the GI Bill and the eco­nomic sit­u­a­tion of the times that I used them to attend college.

When I started col­lege in 1980 I was under the post-Korea and Viet­nam era GI Bill. I got a check every month I attended school. Since I was sin­gle the amount I received was $327 per month for a full load of 12 hours. That amount increased to $376 by the time I grad­u­ated in 1984. That doesn’t sound like much, but con­sider that tuition at state uni­ver­si­ties in Texas was $4 per semes­ter hour dur­ing that time period, plus the fact that I worked full-time as a fire­man, and one can see how I made out.

I remem­ber on at least one occa­sion and per­haps maybe it hap­pened more often than that but I received my monthly check and was able to pay tuition, fees and books for that semes­ter just by using my monthly stipend.

A year after I grad­u­ated I returned to my alma mater, Stephen F. Austin State Uni­ver­sity, with thoughts of get­ting a grad­u­ate degree. Since I had only a minor in polit­i­cal sci­ence, which was the field I had locked onto for a pos­si­ble master’s, I had to first take a few more hours to get my sec­ond bachelor’s in that field. By that time tuition had jumped to a whop­ping $12 per semes­ter hour.

Look­ing at my old school’s Web page with its tuition cal­cu­la­tor I see that for a full load dur­ing the upcom­ing fall semes­ter the tuition is $50 per semes­ter hour, then you start look­ing at fees, room and board if you live on cam­pus, etc., and the num­bers start increasing.

Even adjust­ing for infla­tion what I spent back then for var­i­ous costs were a steal. In today’s dol­lars I would be pay­ing $196 a month for the one-bedroom apart­ment I rented when I started college.

It is no won­der that when I look back on the days I went to col­lege that I felt some­what rich. Lit­tle won­der I feel that way since the Bureau of Labor Sta­tis­tics Infla­tion Cal­cu­la­tor shows that the amount I was mak­ing in com­bined salary and GI Bill would be more than $39,000 in today’s dol­lars. That’s pretty good buy­ing power for a col­lege guy.

So today’s vet­eran, when some­one tells you the col­lege they are sell­ing is bar­gain then per­haps it might be. But it cer­tainly isn’t the bar­gain that I had when start­ing school almost 30 years ago.

Back in service a day later

For slightly less than 24 hours I have been off the Inter­net due to a bro­ken wire­less modem. For­get that I didn’t know that I had insur­ance for dam­aged wire­less equip­ment. I had no idea that such equip­ment could be deliv­ered within 24 hours. I sup­pose that is because the insur­ance com­pany was the mover behind the cur­tain rather than Verizon.

I sup­pose that when one sees he or she is spend­ing more time on the phone with peo­ple from the wire­less Inter­net provider and/or the cell phone com­pany, then per­haps the deal that has been cho­sen isn’t work­ing out so well. Unfor­tu­nately for me, it doesn’t look like I have a choice. Ver­i­zon has the best wire­less Inter­net ser­vice in my area.

When that ser­vice is work­ing prop­erly it is super and with excel­lent speeds. The prob­lem is con­sis­tency. I sup­pose I shouldn’t get bent out of shape because my Inter­net fails right in the mid­dle of doing some­thing impor­tant or time-sensitive. My wire­less is still 10 times bet­ter than what I have to put up with using dial-up for my gov­ern­ment computer.

Then again, I don’t have to pay a monthly charge for my dial-up ser­vice which pow­ers my part-time job’s equip­ment online.

This all makes me won­der if cell and wire­less Inter­net ser­vice will some­day be some­where next to flaw­less? With com providers, such as Ver­i­zon, trim­ming more and more work­ers form its rolls it cer­tainly seems that is a dream of some­thing far, far into the future.

The password is …

Look at them. A page of jum­bled let­ters, num­bers and spe­cial char­ac­ters I have writ­ten down on sev­eral dif­fer­ent pages . It’s all for the sake of com­puter security.

I have about 15 dif­fer­ent pass­words for work-related sites, or should I say, my part-time work-related sites. Then I  prob­a­bly have another 25 or 30 more pass­words for per­sonal use or for my other line of work.

Now, I must admit that con­trary to all the warn­ings, I do some­times use the same pass­words to access dif­fer­ent pages. I am warned over and over not to do that. But have mercy on a poor soul as me who does good to remem­ber the gro­cery list.

I would almost be will­ing to bet that my num­ber of pass­words are even lower than many other com­puter users. But there are still too many pass­words that fly out in front of me, leav­ing me dazed and confused.

Per­haps some­one out there in the com­put­er­sphere is work­ing  on a way to min­i­mize pass­words. I mean, some sites can remem­ber your pass­word and login name. And then some sites say they can but don’t really do it, like my Ver­i­zon Wire­less account. Maybe we should get Sally Struthers to do a TV com­mer­cial ask­ing for bucks for devel­op­ing a password-free world like she did seek­ing help for all those impov­er­ished for­eign children.

Please we need to limit pass­words before peo­ple go stark rav­ing mad. Time is run­ning out!

Ted Poe: To Birth or Not to Birth

U.S. Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, is embar­rass­ing his con­stituents again. I am one of them. Poe, the for­mer headline-happy judge turned right-wing nut cham­pion, has shown him­self to be in the fore­front of the “Birther” movement.

The so-called “Birthers” are those who either cling to the fan­tasy or have helped per­pet­u­ate it that Pres­i­dent Obama was born in Kenya. Poe has at the very least done his share to make sure this sec­ond round of rais­ing the birth issue gained a lit­tle press. Oth­ers among the Birthers believe Obama’s elec­tion to U.S. pres­i­dent is part of some larger conspiracy.

Poe, who shows up tout­ing his right-wing views on CNN’s Lou Dobbs and var­i­ous Fox News pro­grams, was  one of the spon­sors of a bill that would require pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates to pro­duce a copy of their birth cer­tifi­cate. Some­what iron­i­cally, Poe and oth­ers push­ing the “Birther Bill” voted for a res­o­lu­tion hon­or­ing Hawaii’s 50 years in the the union and not­ing the Aloha State is the birth­place of Barack Obama.

Offi­cials in Hawaii today once again affirmed that Barack Obama was born in Hon­olulu.

Back to Poe, he has proven that he is more inter­ested on hot-button issues that will get him on Must See Right-Wing TV than help­ing out the home folks back in the 2nd Con­gres­sional Dis­trict of Texas. For instance he appeared on one right-leaning TV show, I think it was Lou Dobbs, using El Paso as a back­drop. While I too have con­cerns about El Paso I am not a con­gress­man. Poe is and he doesn’t rep­re­sent El Paso.

Although the dis­trict no longer rep­re­sents the heart of the East Texas Piney­woods as it once did –  the 2nd being urban and in the afflu­ent ares north of Hous­ton cer­tainly more Repub­li­can –  it is easy to deter­mine that Ted Poe is no Char­lie Wilson.

Maybe next elec­tion the folks of the 2nd Con­gres­sional Dis­trict of Texas includ­ing Repub­li­cans will do as oth­ers did in elect­ing Obama and a Democratic-controlled Con­gress, and turn out Ted Poe so he can do his wingnut act with­out tax­pay­ers foot­ing the bill.

No police discount for you

A wise man once said: “Stu­pid is as stu­pid does.”

This morn­ing I lis­tened as a defen­dant appear­ing for sen­tenc­ing before the local crim­i­nal court judge copped to stu­pid­ity as the rea­son the man com­mit­ted the acts for which he pleaded guilty. Those charges were for evad­ing arrest and imper­son­at­ing a pub­lic servant.

I was in the crim­i­nal court­room this morn­ing for a free­lance gig and while wait­ing through the docket call. I got to view the seem­ingly never-ending parade of idiocy that keeps our crim­i­nal jus­tice sys­tem in business.

The facts in this par­tic­u­lar defendant’s charges were not totally clear as he had already pleaded guilty and was only in court for pun­ish­ment. But it appears that he ran from police on a motor­cy­cle at speeds of what he said was near 100 mph. His charge of imper­son­at­ing a police offi­cer stemmed from his attempt to buy a range-finder for play­ing golf dur­ing which time he had asked for a police dis­count. Whether the two charges were related or if he flashed a phony badge eludes me.

I do know in a brief research of the defendant’s crim­i­nal records in three states that he had prior charges for reck­less dri­ving, speed­ing and crim­i­nal imper­son­ation. It makes me won­der if he is a ser­ial imper­son­ator. He no doubt has a need for speed. He also claims to be a pro­fes­sional bike racer but given his his­tory I am not sure I would take his word at face value.

The judge sen­tenced the man to pro­ba­tion and a fine on the two charges. Let’s just hope that the man doesn’t try to imper­son­ate a pro­ba­tion officer.

What’d I say?

Yes­ter­day I com­mented about the remark made by Pres­i­dent Obama at his press con­fer­ence the night before. Among his state­ments, Obama said the Cam­bridge, Mass., police depart­ment “acted stu­pidly” in han­dling the arrest of Har­vard pro­fes­sor Henry Louis Gates Jr. The arrest has turned into a big racial con­tro­versy that I feel has more to do with a cou­ple of peo­ple with bruised egos, one of which was arrested with charges later being dismissed.

I remarked that Obama was only half right about the inci­dent in which white police Sgt. Jim Crow­ley arrested Obama’s friend Gates, who is black, for dis­or­derly conduct. Police were called because Gates was thought to be break­ing into his own home. Gates became upset over the con­fronta­tion, which led to his arrest. I said the inci­dent should have ended when Gates pro­duced iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. I still believe that. But I think Gates should have used com­mon sense and per­haps kept a cooler head.

This morn­ing sev­eral Boston-area police unions expressed their out­rage — as have many other Amer­i­cans, many of whom are Repub­li­cans — over the president’s remarks.

This after­noon Obama said, in a sur­prise appear­ance at the White House press brief­ing room, that he had called Crow­ley. While Obama did not apol­o­gize he said that he told Crow­ley he wished he had used a bet­ter choice of words dur­ing Wednesday’s press con­fer­ence. Obama also is hop­ing to put together a “peace con­fer­ence” over beers with Crow­ley and Gates. Great, they’ll all get drunk, wind up in a brawl and we’ll have an even big­ger brouhaha! Just kidding.

Of course, the con­tro­versy won’t end there as I said yes­ter­day it wouldn’t end any­time soon. As some­one on cable news said this morn­ing, when­ever the pres­i­dent makes a state­ment on some­thing it extends the mat­ter at least another day. His oppo­nents will cer­tainly try to run the mat­ter into the ground.

Let’s just hope the pres­i­dent can bring peace between the hos­tiles and have that beer.

Here’s to stupidity in America

Let’s not talk about health care reform. It makes my head spin and my doc­tor said I could stop tak­ing the med­ica­tion that has made my head do that for the last sev­eral days. So, it need not spin more.

I watched Pres­i­dent Obama’s news con­fer­ence last night as he talked mostly on reform­ing the nation’s health care sys­tem. Jeez that guy can be long-winded some­times. I may have to start call­ing him Gabby, except that reminds me of Gabby Hayes the old coot West­ern star as well as a freaked-out par­rot I know.

Instead of health care I will briefly men­tion Obama’s remarks on the con­tro­versy regard­ing the arrest of Har­vard pro­fes­sor Henry Louis Gates Jr. Gates is the dis­tin­guished prof who was con­fronted while break­ing into his own house by a Cam­bridge, Mass., police offi­cer. The white offi­cer, basi­cally seemed to dis­like Gates’ atti­tude and arrested the black man for dis­or­derly con­duct charges which were later dropped.

Obama admit­ted his bias in the con­tro­versy because he is a friend of Gates but com­mented that Cam­bridge police “acted stu­pidly” dur­ing the incident.

It seems after read­ing of the actions of both Gates and the offi­cer, Sgt. Jim Crow­ley, that Obama got “it” half-right. If you take the word of both Gates and Crow­ley, and I see no rea­son why not to, even though both may be exag­ger­at­ing a wee bit because they both seem pretty stub­born and pig-headed, both share some blame for the outcome.

First off, the cop was doing his job respond­ing to a call of a pos­si­ble break-in, some­thing for which Gates should be grate­ful. Gates showed his ID and the inci­dent should have ended there. But it didn’t. Gates got his nose out of joint.  Crow­ley got into a snit. Things took off from there.

Before we get all racial let me say one thing. I have seen cops act pretty stu­pid toward me when I wasn’t doing a thing ille­gal. One woke me up in the mid­dle of the night and demanded to see my fed­eral ID because I was using a gov­ern­ment car and the place in which I was stay­ing was not exactly Bev­erly Hills. I have had them ID me for walk­ing down the road and when they couldn’t find any other rea­son to jack with me, they said I was walk­ing on the wrong side of the road. So some, by no means all, police do act stu­pid at times.

When I do encounter stu­pid­ity as such, I try to just let it slide because I know if I don’t I’ll prob­a­bly be arrested and taken to jail on some trumped-up charges sim­i­lar to those for which gates was busted.

Granted, I’m not a black man. I haven’t been sub­jected to what many black men have over time such as DWB, dri­ving  while black. I could imag­ine it would get very old but I think many would think as I do that if they lose it they go directly to jail, no mat­ter if they are inno­cent. Oh and here is a dirty lit­tle secret, some white peo­ple includ­ing some white cops don’t like black peo­ple, espe­cially black men, who among other names are known by such cops as “perpetrators.”

Thus, from what I can tell in read­ing about the sit­u­a­tion that night in Cam­bridge, it seems that both the offi­cer and Gates went some­what over the top. There is a dif­fer­ence though. Gates did live in the house. He appar­ently broke no laws other than cop­ping an atti­tude, par­don the pun. So it appears that he was a vic­tim of false arrest.

All of this points to an opin­ion that, Obama prob­a­bly shouldn’t have com­mented, or deflected the ques­tion as he can so aptly do at times. Or oth­er­wise Obama should have said both share some blame even though the Cam­bridge police acted even more stu­pidly than the president’s friend and in fact falsely arrested a man in his own home.

But it’s water under the bridge. Too bad the water won’t just flow on down silently toward the sea. I just don’t see that happening.

Houston VA: Ve Vant to see your papers!

If you are going to the Depart­ment of Vet­er­ans Affairs com­plex in Hous­ton begin­ning Wednes­day, July 29, you bet­ter have some offi­cial VA iden­ti­fi­ca­tion — either for employee or patient.

Hous­ton VA offi­cials said in a press release hot off the mojo wire this after­noon that all vehi­cles enter­ing the com­plex will be stopped and occu­pants will be required to show some form of  VA iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. Required is a VA iden­ti­fi­ca­tion badge, VA park­ing tag, vet­eran iden­ti­fi­ca­tion card or an appoint­ment letter.

The mas­sive ID check for the busy com­plex which includes both the VA Regional Office and the Michael E. DeBakey Vet­er­ans Hos­pi­tal is an attempt to reduce unau­tho­rized  park­ing at the cen­ter, which is located in Houston’s busy Texas Med­ical Center.

Any­one who has ever been to the Hous­ton VA hos­pi­tal can appre­ci­ate the dif­fi­culty in find­ing park­ing, espe­cially in the morn­ings. This seems to be a prob­lem at many VA hos­pi­tals. But such an iden­ti­fi­ca­tion check does raise ques­tions. If the check is at the entrances to the cen­ter, what effect will it have on traf­fic, espe­cially those cars headed on Hol­combe Boule­vard in the morn­ings for the many dif­fer­ent Hous­ton hos­pi­tals? What about the vet­eran from Podunk, Texas, who left his appoint­ment let­ter at home, 100 miles away? What about the vet­eran who is going to the VA for the first time to enroll for ser­vices and has no ID, only his proof of mil­i­tary ser­vice? Finally, what about the many vet­er­ans who are not going to see this lit­tle notice because the major­ity of the news media, espe­cially out­side Hous­ton, are not going to report such information?

It kind of makes you won­der. But hey, I did my part. If you have any ques­tions, call the Hous­ton VA police through the main hos­pi­tal num­ber, and good luck get­ting through. It can be quite chal­leng­ing to call some­one at the Hous­ton VA hos­pi­tal. Then again, patience is a nec­es­sary virtue for VA patients.

Better living through chemistry

Per­haps it is the pre­scrip­tion drug that is fog­ging my mind but I had for­got­ten that the phrase “Bet­ter Liv­ing Through Chem­istry” actu­ally para­phrased the slo­gan Dow Chem­i­cal used for many years: “Bet­ter Things for Bet­ter Living…Through Chem­istry.” Either way the bet­ter liv­ing part all depends on how that chem­istry is used. At the moment,  the chem­istry in my brain that I am using as the doc­tor told me to has left me a bit on the wob­bly side.

I was pre­scribed the drug gabapentin, com­monly known as Neu­ron­tin, yes­ter­day for what my doc­tor sus­pects as some kind of neu­ropa­thy, or nerve pain that has been caus­ing both of my feet to hurt and become numb after what I think is lim­ited use. I will have some tests to find out for sure if neu­ropa­thy is what I’ve got, I’ve got, I’ve got. Sorry I was think­ing about a song. I’ve lost my train of thought. The train has left the sta­tion. Any­way, the point I am try­ing to make — so poorly — is that right now, clar­ity is not exactly my mid­dle name. Of course, it never was.

Nev­er­the­less, what­ever  you do when you get pre­scribed a drug, don’t read about it. It will scare the liv­ing hell out of you. This one I am tak­ing has a whole  host of pos­si­ble side effects short of a con­di­tion known as hot dog fin­ger. The most dis­turb­ing is this warn­ing issued by the FDA for this entire class of drugs which were orig­i­nally used in treat­ing epilepsy. The notice, which warns of an increased risk of sui­ci­dal behav­ior,  kind of makes my cot­ton­mouth and how­ever you describe how I am feel­ing look insignificant.

And my toes still hurt. It’s time for flip flops.

The road to good intentions is paved with, well?

Veteran_small

Con­gress — on occa­sion — passes laws that have some good or at least a good intention.

One would hope, at least, some good inten­tions spurred law­mak­ers to add rid­ers to the Defense Autho­riza­tion bills in 2008 and 2009 which expanded the abil­ity for vet­er­ans who are not in uni­form to ren­der a hand salute.

In the past, only mem­bers of vet­er­ans ser­vice orga­ni­za­tions who wore their organization’s offi­cial head­gear were tra­di­tion­ally allowed to hand salute dur­ing the National Anthem, accord­ing to an arti­cle on Military.com. Vet­er­ans and other civil­ians not in uni­form  — like­wise a tra­di­tion — nor­mally place their right hands over their “hearts” in lieu of a military-style hand salute for the play­ing of the anthem and other flag-related activities.

Thanks to an amend­ment in the 2008 Defense Autho­riza­tion Act retired mil­i­tary mem­bers and vet­er­ans can now give a hand salute when­ever the U.S. flag is raised, low­ered or passes.

A 2009 amend­ment to that fis­cal year’s defense bill allows out-of-uniform mil­i­tary per­son­nel and vet­er­ans to ren­der a hand salute dur­ing the National Anthem.

Now the grow­ing num­ber of peo­ple in the U.S. who have no con­nec­tion what­so­ever with the mil­i­tary and even some vet­er­ans them­selves might won­der why would such a law be passed?

The answer is that there was  obvi­ously some sen­ti­ment among vet­er­ans and mil­i­tary retirees, not to men­tion some of the pow­er­ful vet­er­ans orga­ni­za­tions, for cod­i­fy­ing such a prac­tice. Why? I don’t know. It seems as if the law lacks some prac­ti­cal­ity inso­far as enforce­ment is concerned.

Let’s say you are at a high school foot­ball game. The National Anthem is played and the col­ors are pre­sented on the field by the local Junior ROTC drill team. You, the vet­eran, are wear­ing a big pair of horns on your head because your team is the Long­horns. Now do you do the hand over your chest or give the mil­i­tary hand salute?

Okay, say you give the hand salute. A local cop sees you comes over and starts grilling you about being in civvies and giv­ing a military-style salute. You say it’s legal now. The cop said he never heard any­thing about it. You say: “Trust me.” The cop says: “Okay. I’ll trust you if you can show me some ID prov­ing you are a veteran.”

Now one might think such a request would be easy. But it isn’t nec­es­sar­ily all that simple.

You, the vet­eran with the long­horn hat, spent your four years and got out of the ser­vice. You have your DD-214 form which proves your ser­vice — some­where — although it is not on your “per­son,” as the cop who ques­tioned you might say. You didn’t retire from the ser­vice so you don’t have a mil­i­tary retiree ID card. You don’t go to the VA for health care so you don’t have a VA iden­ti­fi­ca­tion card. You don’t belong to the VFW, Amer­i­can Legion, DAV or any other vet­er­ans orga­ni­za­tion. Basi­cally, you are SOL to use a good old mil­i­tary acronym until you call up the county clerk in the next state where you filed your DD-214 after get­ting out of the ser­vice and ask her to send a copy to the local authorities.

Now that sce­nario about the ball game and the has­sle by the cops and all the trou­ble is a lot of hyper­bole. Heck, I have no idea as to whether there even is any enforce­ment mech­a­nism in laws which let you honor the flag with that sharp, five fin­gers (if you got ‘em) salute with the tip of your index fin­ger next to the right eyebrow.

If I ever gave a mil­i­tary salute, it would prob­a­bly be in a sit­u­a­tion in which other vet­er­ans might do the same thing, say at some kind of vet­er­ans pro­gram or maybe a funeral with mil­i­tary honors.

Per­son­ally, I have always thought the hand salute is pretty cool. It is a sign of respect unlike so many oth­ers, which car­ries with it non-verbal cues aimed toward the object or indi­vid­ual one is saluting.

For instance: You salute an offi­cer you don’t know. You are salut­ing his posi­tion and author­ity. You salute an offi­cer you do know and like. You are say­ing: “Hey, what’s hap­pen­ing bud?” with­out being insub­or­di­nate. You salute an offi­cer you know and don’t like. You are say­ing: “I respect your rank. Now chuck you farley.”

So just remem­ber when you see a civil­ian salut­ing the flag or dur­ing the National Anthem that Con­gress gave this man or woman the right to wear their civil­ian clothes and give a good old military-type hand salute, one each, because of the sac­ri­fice these folks made for their coun­try. As to whether they are really vet­er­ans, I guess you’ll just have to take it on faith. Or ask to see some ID, at your own risk. You cer­tainly wouldn’t want to get gored by those horns.