Scott Brown: Pretty boy, father of the year wins in Mass

 The news that Repub­li­can Scott Brown beat Demo­c­rat Martha Coak­ley last night in the race for the long-held Demo­c­ra­tic seat for U.S. Sen­ate in Mass­a­chu­setts doesn’t upset me.

 One has to expect lit­tle bumps in the road here and there. Plus, the fact that it was Brown — who once posed nude in Cos­mopoli­tan – as vic­tor makes the story even bet­ter. Brown even man­aged to thor­oughly embar­rass his two college-age daugh­ters in his accep­tance speech by telling the world his girls “were avail­able.” I mean that is just plain wrong! That even dis­gusts me.

 Such com­ments and Brown’s past has even given right-wing cable freak Glenn Beck the willies. Beck said he didn’t trust Brown and that the new senator’s tenure “could end with a dead intern.”

 The real­ity was Coak­ley ran her cam­paign ini­tially as if she was the cho­sen one, mean­ing she didn’t do did­dley squat. Even if she was run­ning against a corpse for the U.S. Sen­ate she should have been out their cam­paign­ing her heart out.

 As for all the dire pre­dic­tions by the pun­dits and GOP talk­ing heads and cable news con­stantly jonesing for polit­i­cal con­flict, this might not be as big as every­one makes it. It might not stop health care reform. The Democ­rats still have a major­ity in Con­gress and they’d like to have a super major­ity, but because of Brown they don’t. Con­gress could pass health care through rec­on­cil­i­a­tion — pass­ing a bud­get bill in the Sen­ate with­out fil­li­buster – or per­haps they could piece­meal it. They may drop it alto­gether, but I can’t really see that as Obama has so much invested in pass­ing health care reform.

O bitch-slaps Beck and Fox once again

  For quite awhile now the loonies of right-wing pun­ditry land have had a pretty free hand in telling lies on their oppo­nents with lit­tle con­se­quence. But no less than the pres­i­dent of the United States is now chal­leng­ing the verac­ity of Glenn Beck and Fox News and friends.

 The White House responded Wednes­day on its blog to charges Beck and oth­ers have made regard­ing Obama’s attempts to gain an Olympic bid for Chicago. White House blog­ger Jessie Lee wrote on a post titled “Real­ity Check: Try­ing to Turn a Point of Pride Into a Moment of Shame” that the Olympics were once a point of pride and unity for the coun­try but …

 ” … once again Fox News’ Glenn Beck pro­gram has shown that noth­ing is wor­thy of respect if it can be used as part of a par­ti­san attack to boost ratings.”

 In the words of some long for­got­ten barfly who sat in the bar stool next to me in Jim’s Lounge back dur­ing my Navy days in Gulf­port, Miss.: “You got that right!”

 Obama’s folks are no longer play­ing nice and let­ting com­pletely absurd untruths to slide by. The White House Blog post noted:

  “RHETORIC:    BECK SAID VANCOUVER LOST $1 BILLION WHEN ITHAD THE OLYMPICS.”   Glenn Beck said, Van­cou­ver lost, how much was it? they lost a bil­lion dol­lars when they had the Olympics.”  [Tran­script, Glenn Beck Show, 9/29/09]

 “REALITY:   VANCOUVERS OLYMPICS WILL NOT TAKE PLACE UNTIL 2010.   Van­cou­ver will host the 2010 Olympic and Par­a­lympic Games from Feb­ru­ary 12 – 28, 2010 and March 12–21, 2010, respec­tively. [Vancouver2010.com, accessed 9/29/09]”

 You can read the rest for your­self and see how the Obama admin­is­tra­tion has a whole new ball­game under way in deal­ing with even its most pow­er­ful critics.

 Obama has snubbed Fox more than once lately and his avoid­ance has been noth­ing if not matter-of-fact.

 More thought­ful pun­dits say Obama is mak­ing a mis­take not talk­ing to the large audi­ence watch­ing Fox News. But the fact is, his elec­toral base is not the typ­i­cal Glenn Beck watcher. Plus, Fox has become increas­ingly even in its over­all news cov­er­age — for­get talk shows like Beck, O’Reilly and Han­nity — more biased toward the right. The ads Fox took out falsely claim­ing other news out­lets avoided cov­er­ing the events of the recent Tea Partyista’s march on Wash­ing­ton are just some of the more bla­tant exam­ples of the cable chan­nel head­ing toward a dom­i­nant role as a right-wing pro­pa­ganda tool.

 I am happy for this bold­ness towards Fox and dem­a­gogues such as Beck. Their lies do noth­ing but obscure infor­ma­tion the peo­ple need about their gov­ern­ment. Likewise, it becomes more dif­fi­cult to gov­ern and to be governed.

Dancing With the Czars

A lit­tle Fri­day after­noon humor with our national Nut Czar — Glenn Beck — cour­tesy of the Dems.

Advertisers just say no to Glenn Beck

 It is nice to see that some large cor­po­ra­tions still respond to the wishes of the consumer.

 Sev­eral spon­sors of the Fox News show “Glenn Beck” have announced they are pulling their adver­tise­ments in the wake of the host’s remarks that Pres­i­dent Obama is racist.

 Beck, not to be con­fused with the one-named singer Beck, said on another Fox show that Obama is a “racist” and has a “deep-seated hatred for white peo­ple.” Obama, not be con­fused with an Irish bar­tender, replied that Beck was a “hor­ri­ble bas­ket­ball player” and “can’t dance for diddly.”  

  The adver­tis­ers which include Geico, Sar­gento, Proc­tor and Gam­ble, the Phizer phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal company, Kraft Foods and Pro­gres­sive Insur­ance did not remove their com­mer­cials from the Fox News net­work. Thus the Rupert Mur­doch Repub­li­can Party’s Right Wing Hate Machine net­work as it is also known stands to lose no money from sponsors.

 A black polit­i­cal coali­tion, ColorofChange.org, launched the drive for spon­sors yank­ing their ads from Beck’s show. The linked “The New York Times” arti­cle describes Beck also as a “con­ser­v­a­tive radio host and come­dian.” That descrip­tion is itself funny because Beck has all the humor of Hein­rich Himm­ler on a bad day.

 Speak­ing of con­cen­tra­tion camps, Beck said in recent months that FEMA was build­ing con­cen­tra­tion camps for Repub­li­cans and other Obama oppo­nents. The rumor was later debunked on his own show. Too bad the same can’t be done for Sarah Palin’s “Death Pan­els.”