Maybe no tropical problems, for now

 Maybe, just maybe, we have missed the three Atlantic-Gulf tropical systems that have been stirring around out there.

 Hurricane season over the past four years has taught me to never feel relieved about missing a hurricane or tropical system that could turn into a hurricane until it is gone and can’t jump back out into the ocean, re-form and strike once more.

 Weather forecasters had put Rita’s landfall in September 2005 at several places on the southern Texas coast including the area around Corpus Christi which is almost Mexico. (I’m sure Corpus Christians would be glad to hear that!) Instead Rita made landfall around Johnson’s Bayou, La., just east of the Texas border. It ended up wreaking havoc more than 100 miles inland.

 Something similar happened with Ike last year and Humberto in 2007 sneaked up on us kind of like the Tropical Storm Claudette did to Florida this morning.

 Here on the uppermost Texas coast we are supposedly under the influence of a tropical wave that allegedly was to bring us rain but I’ve yet to see anything more than a couple of drops.

 I know the local TV weather gods can’t be told anything but I wish someone with some clout — like their bosses — would tell them to stow their air of certainty when it comes to forecasting hurricanes. I have seen some weather geeks, probably not meteorologists, who take the three- and five-day cones the National Hurricane Center issues as the last word on storm tracks. Hey dips**t, it’s a cone, that means the hurricane models show the storm can end up anywhere within that cone, north or south. The storm might not even stay inside the cone.

 Even if I was the smartest man, weatherman, on Earth I would not say “we have nothing to worry about” until we truly have nothing to worry about.  I mean, what if some people were actually stupid enough to believe what the weather man says and he ends up getting caught flat-footed with the water “six feet high and rising?”

Advertisers just say no to Glenn Beck

 It is nice to see that some large corporations still respond to the wishes of the consumer.

 Several sponsors of the Fox News show “Glenn Beck” have announced they are pulling their advertisements in the wake of the host’s remarks that President Obama is racist.

 Beck, not to be confused with the one-named singer Beck, said on another Fox show that Obama is a “racist” and has a “deep-seated hatred for white people.” Obama, not be confused with an Irish bartender, replied that Beck was a “horrible basketball player” and “can’t dance for diddly.”  

  The advertisers which include Geico, Sargento, Proctor and Gamble, the Phizer pharmaceutical company, Kraft Foods and Progressive Insurance did not remove their commercials from the Fox News network. Thus the Rupert Murdoch Republican Party’s Right Wing Hate Machine network as it is also known stands to lose no money from sponsors.

 A black political coalition, ColorofChange.org, launched the drive for sponsors yanking their ads from Beck’s show. The linked “The New York Times” article describes Beck also as a “conservative radio host and comedian.” That description is itself funny because Beck has all the humor of Heinrich Himmler on a bad day.

 Speaking of concentration camps, Beck said in recent months that FEMA was building concentration camps for Republicans and other Obama opponents. The rumor was later debunked on his own show. Too bad the same can’t be done for Sarah Palin’s “Death Panels.”

Cell or no cell?

 Perhaps because we move kind of slow down here in Texas is the reason why trends which have taken place elsewhere don’t always get to the Lone Star State posthaste. Take, for instance, bans on using cell phones while driving.

 A new law will take effect on Sept. 1 in Texas — on a local-option basis — which bans the use of cell phones in school zones. By local-option, I mean that the governing jurisdiction of where the school is located has to first approve it. If it is in a city, the city must approve it and county commissioners must give their approval if it is in an unincorporated area.

 I suppose the Texas Legislature and Gov. Good Hair Perry, in their infinite wisdom, decided they didn’t want to get get stuck as being the ones who outlawed using a cell altogether while driving. That is, no matter how many people get killed because of people yakking on their phones and not watching what they are doing.

 One thought has piqued my curiosity. Since Mothers Against Drunk Driving is largely responsible for one no longer even feeling they can drink one beer and drive without worrying about a DUI charge, I wonder their thoughts on cell use and driving?

 Admittedly, I have not had a chance to do extensive research but in a quick search of the MADD Web page all I could find was a resolution supporting the use of cell phones in vehicles for reporting drunk drivers. I wonder where they really stand?

 Although the federal highway safety agency tried to sit on studies showing even hands-free use of cell phones is deadly, other studies show those talking on the phone are four times as likely to crash and are as likely to wreck as drivers with a blood-alcohol content of .08.

 I admit that I sometimes use my phone while driving. It is a habit that I am trying to break just as seeing — when I was as a firefighter — numerous folks dead who didn’t wear seatbelts got me in the habit of wearing one. Sad to admit, I once used to drink and drive. Hell, just about every Texan who both drank and who drived cherished the long stretch when the state had no open container law or at least one that had no teeth. Times have changed now. You can get ticketed for an open container and can be arrested for DUI for almost having alcohol on your breath. Don’t get me started on those who can serve and die for their country unable to get a drink because they aren’t 21!

 And so it goes. My libertarian friends don’t like the idea of government playing nanny, and I don’t like it a whole lot either. But safety aside, a lot of practical utility comes from laws like mandating seat belts, DUI and banning cell phones. This includes money spent on insurance premiums, taxes we pay to support hospitals, worker productivity (having your worker show up instead of he or she being in jail, the hospital or the morgue), to list a few.

 So, I imagine one day completely giving up talking on a cell and driving. Unlike many people I see every day, I don’t stay on the phone from the time I get in my auto until I disembark, and then some.

 I can live without driving and cell chatting; perhaps even live because I am not driving and talking on the phone.

I forgot to write a header; Something storm

 It’s hard to think about cyclones hitting elsewhere on the globe when you’ve lived your life generally hurricane-free, then all of a sudden the place where you live becomes a hurricane magnet during the past four years (Rita, Humberto, Ike).

 Now little areas of disturbed weather — most of which are between the West Africa coast and the West Indies — are being watched for possible hurricane development. Until these storms, including Tropical Depression 2, get closer to the U.S. we will play a waiting game to see if the unwelcomed trend will continue.

 But in the meantime, folks like my friend Paul and his family are having to deal both with heavy rain and thunderstorms from a typhoon as well as earthquakes.Paul, a friend from college and a de facto consultant on the quirks of Word Press which powers this blog, lives in Tokyo where he reports the worst seemed to have past from earthquakes even though the shaking there was pretty substantial — enough for his kids to get under the kitchen table.

 At least hurricanes develop and move relatively slow — Humberto being an exception — so one can see them coming. But earthquakes are something else. Thankfully, we don’t have many earthquakes where I live on the upper Texas coast. I’m not going to say they don’t happen. There have been small ‘quakes detected within a 100-mile radiius of the area, but not those high up on the Richter scale.

 I don’t know if any place on Earth is without the threat of some kind of natural disaster: tornadoes, sandstorms, droughts, cyclones, earthquakes, avalanches, forest fires, floods. And of course, no one is really safe from some kind of cosmic debris like a meteor. Nature has many ways to get ya!

 But that’s life in the big Universe. There is nothing anyone can do about it so just sit back and enjoy the show. Be sure to board up your windows, stock up on Vienna sausages or do whatever you need to do to prepare — if you can prepare — first.

Media melodrama: Push this back

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah “Caribou Barbie” Palin continues her reign of stupidity in American culture by her remarks over the weekend that the president’s health care reform would result in “death panels” to decide who lives or dies.

The ex-leader and failed Republican vice presidential candidate later backed off and asked for “restraint,” perhaps because folks in her own party were calling her contentions “nuts.”

Perhaps what is worse than the moronic expressions and downright silliness coming from those who are basically shills for big corporations who oppose health reform is that national media coverage of it all has received so much play.

If it could be proven that the anger we see each day on TV at townhalls is genuine as opposed to manufactured, or Astroturf, then the overwhelming media coverage would be warranted. But I think enough doubt and enough evidence has been raised that these shouting matches that pass for civic discourse is largely a tactic by big business and the Republican establishment to scare and whip opposition for health reform into a frenzy.

It would seem after being used to gain public support for an unnecessary war in Iraq that the media would get it.

So much of what one sees today in, at least the national media, is political conflict. That seems all that matters to news producers and editors in these national newsrooms. It is like Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz observed in a WP online chat yesterday when he said that the media likes to “keep stirring the pot and reducing everything to melodrama.”

Is the media in such coverage these days reflecting what the public wants to hear or are they molding the message to keep stirring the pot and turning the news into soap opera fodder?

That’s what it all seems like sometimes to me and I wish the media would stop it. And stop it right now! Cover the news, damn it. If I want soap operas I will watch “One Life to Live” or read about the Palin family.

And while you are at it, will you all in the national media and on cable channels quit using the gratuitous use of the word “pushback.” Yes, it is a real word and in most cases the meaning is being used somewhat in a correct fashion. But it is a buzzword and buzzwords get old in a hurry, especially if they aren’t funny.