OJ's prison sentence hollow but still punishment

O.J. Simpson dodged the bullet, or needle, for allegedly killing his wife and her friend. But he faces 15 years in prison today after being sentenced for an armed robbery that happened in a Las Vegas hotel room.

It is likely a hollow victory for the Browns and Goldmans, whose daughter and son were the victims in the 1994 murder for which Simpson was acquitted. Likewise, those many, many Americans who believed Simpson should have been convicted should not feel as justice was served in the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman with today’s sentencing. All of this raises a point regarding the public’s perception of punishment.

The purpose of punishing crime is in a great part helping the public feel as if justice is served. For many, a prison sentence is justice served with respect to a particular case. Unfortunately, it doesn’t really work when you look at putting someone away for a crime when that crime is not the one a person would liked to have seen the defendant pay for. I’m sure some would argue with me. But in reality that’s the way our legal system works.

Nonetheless, a true narcissistic knucklehead who convicted a crime with weapons is going off the streets for awhile. That should make any law-abiding citizen have a little faith in the system.

Oh by the way, I always thought it was kind of strange that the popular soul group The O’Jays had that in the early 1970s titled “Back Stabbers.”

Responsive journalism or just responsible journalism?

Earlier today I castigated a local TV station for not publishing on their Web site the location of a home invasion robbery.

A few minutes ago I checked out the station’s site and saw that not only did they publish the block number and street name but they published the exact address.

This blog certainly does not take credit for KBMT Channel 12 doing the right thing. I checked out my Web site counter and found no evidence anyone from that station read my post. However, I did send the station a comment after reading the story this afternoon. And although my comment is missing from their site, along with any other comments, they did what they were supposed to do in the journalistic sense.

Did my comment to the station criticizing their choice not to expose where the crime took place play any part in their decision? Beats me. The point is that the station had the good sense to realize that readers and/or viewers have a vested interest in knowing details when stories affect them or might affect them.

Now I suppose someone will complain about the station giving in their news report the exact address of the crime scene rather than the street name or the street name and its hundred block. Oh well, that’s life in the big (and not so big) city.

Local TV news sometimes makes you want to scream

Having worked as a newspaper reporter for almost two decades of my life, I realize there has always been some natural friction between print people and electronic news gathering folks. But sometimes the local TV people — in smaller markets especially — can just make you want to throw the teevee out in the yard or use it for sighting in your rifle

My case in chief: Today, local station KBMT Channel 12 in Beaumont, Texas, reported that the police are looking for suspects in a home invasion robbery.

They have some pertinent information in the story such as the suspects tied up the homeowner, stole something then fled. They even gave a description of the vehicle the perps were driving.

What is glaringly missing is that the story does not mention where this home invasion robbery happened? Why? Did the cops not want to give it to the media? Did the media even ask? Did the media not want to embarrass anyone? Were the media just having a synaptic misfire thus not remembering “where” is one of those elements important in a news story?

At the place where I reside a home invasion robbery wouldn’t be too difficult to imagine. But if I was regular Joe Beaumont Citizen, I would want to know where a home invasion robbery took place.

Channel 12 says they will have more on story on their broadcasts at 5, 6 and 10. I hope so, maybe they will finally tell the public where in the hell this robbery occurred.