Jul022010

Independence and pondering a great question

The nation heads toward another birth­day. It seems remark­able some­times, as much strife as the coun­try faces. Peo­ple can’t seem to speak in a civil tone much of the time these days. They argue end­lessly about the stu­pid­ity of the daily polit­i­cal talk­ing points from what­ever side or sides wants the pub­lic to swal­low such rhetoric. Oil seems to be end­lessly attack­ing our shores. Mil­lions are unem­ployed. Things seem really bleak sometime.

Happy 4th of July. Let’s open a big ol’ can of whoop ass!

I sup­pose it takes some­thing like remem­ber­ing the real mean­ing of Inde­pen­dence Day and not just some blowhard politician’s spin on it to put our liv­ing in such an awe­some coun­try in per­spec­tive. It leads me to to pose a ques­tion many have pon­dered over time:

Who was it that first had that inspir­ing idea to put whoop ass in a can?

Jul012010

Goat maintenance? Outlets say al-Qaida has new magazine

Quite a few doubters exist, but var­i­ous media out­lets report that al-Qaida has pub­lished a slick mag­a­zine.

The pub­li­ca­tion, report­edly called Insight, fea­tures such arti­cles as “What to Expect in a Jihad” and “How to Make a Bomb in the Kitchen of Your Mom.” Although some of the arti­cles with word­ing such as the the lat­ter one seem more satir­i­cal than one steeped in a trans­la­tion fail­ure the mag has sup­pos­edly cre­ated a buzz on the Ara­bian penin­sula, accord­ing to a piece by Marc Ambinder on Atlantic Monthly’s Web site The Atlantic.

But even skep­ti­cism exists on The Atlantic as writer Max Fisher spells out five dif­fer­ent rea­sons to doubt the publication’s authen­tic­ity. The dubi­ous­ness Fisher cites includes the rabid secrecy of the ter­ror group’s lead­ers such as Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri as well as a sus­pi­cion by the so-called “Web-based ‘jihadi’ community.”

Still, given that the lead­er­ship of al-Quida has been rel­e­gated to liv­ing in caves and prim­i­tive con­di­tions for years and that its agents as of late have not always proved to be the most reli­able sticks of dyna­mite in the box, one who lives for the use of words (and their mis­use) would love to see what kind of prod­uct could be turned out by such fanat­i­cal bozos. Per­haps we would see sto­ries such as:

“When 74 Vir­gins Prove 74 Too Many: A Dis­cus­sion of Mar­tyr Anxiety.”

“al-Zawari Crit­i­cized For ‘Mis­sion Accom­plished’ Ban­ner Across Cave Entrance.”

“Osama bin Laden’s Secrets to a Healthy Diet of Weeds and Rocks.

“Care for the Length­i­est Beards: 5 Tips That Will Make You the Envy of Prospec­tive Sui­cide Bombers.”

“Escape from Hell: al-Qaida Ex-Prisoner Claims Amer­i­cans Forced Him to Lis­ten to Six Hours of Toby Keith Songs.”

Well, maybe their mag­a­zine, if they have a mag­a­zine, wouldn’t have such enlight­en­ing sto­ries and would have fare more like “Your Goat: Your Friend. Your Feast.” Still it’s always good to see what the enemy is read­ing. Even if it is total bulls**t.

Jun302010

Ironic that the VA is encouraging HIV/AIDS testing these days

It is a lit­tle bit funny — and cer­tainly not in the ‘ha ha’ way — that one of the top fea­tures on the Depart­ment of Vet­er­ans Affairs Web site touts reg­u­lar test­ing for HIV/AIDS test­ing. Make that down­right ironic.

Now more than ever would be a good time for some vet­er­ans to get tested, espe­cially if they are VA patients and espe­cially if they had den­tal treat­ment at the John Cochran VA hos­pi­tal in St. Louis. More than 1,800 patients received let­ters from the VA say­ing that ster­il­iza­tion of some den­tal equip­ment had not been up to stan­dards and could have cre­ated a “low risk for infection.”

This is not the first such break­down lead­ing to risk of dis­eases involv­ing the VA. In 2008, the VA reached out to more than 10,000 patients who might have been exposed to dis­eases such as Hepati­tis through “cross-contamination” of endo­scopes at three dif­fer­ent hos­pi­tals across the coun­try. The VA has also received a bevy of bad pub­lic­ity over the years because of issues such as sub­stan­dard care of elderly and with clean­li­ness prob­lems at sev­eral hospitals.

These are just a few of the many prob­lems the VA has had to deal with rang­ing from vet­er­ans ben­e­fits claims stack­ing up to long wait­ing times to see med­ical spe­cial­ists. It is hard to imag­ine the ones not reported. Many prob­lems, big and small, never see the light of day because so many of the VA patients are of that “great­est gen­er­a­tion” and some slightly younger whose  habit it is not to com­plain. “Things were screwed up in the Army,” some of these old timers think. “So it is sure to be screwed up in the VA.” And some­times, thing are really screwed up.

I have to say that I am dis­ap­pointed with retired Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric Shenseki, the sec­re­tary of vet­er­ans affairs. I would have thought he would have brought some good ol’ Army butt-kicking with him to the cab­i­net post. Yet, I have seen no indi­ca­tion that the VA has vastly improved under his tenure.

I sure hope that changes before peo­ple start actu­ally catch­ing these dis­eases like HIV from behav­ior no more risky than going to the dentist.

Jun292010

Some thoughts from the local lawyer who kicked BP’s ass

Meet one of my home­town folks. Well, it seems like a have a lot of home­town folks because, in addi­tion to my home­town, I have a sec­ondary and ter­tiary home­town. I plan on writ­ing about my sec­ondary one later this week. Or that’s the plan. Beau­mont, Texas, is my ter­tiary home­town. Any­way, this home­town folk I intro­duce today (I don’t know him but wouldn’t mind) has the improb­a­ble name of Brent Coon.

Coon, who plays in a rock band and hangs around with knock­out women, and (he also has a music com­pany and a whole flock of bikini-clad “coon­pups”) is a big dog in tort law right now. This is because in the court room he cleaned BP’s — yes, that BP — clock over the Texas City refin­ery explo­sion in 2005 that killed 15 and injured 170.

The head Coon­dog has a reveal­ing, “as told to,” story about BP that can be found right here on Esquire’s Web site. Yes, that Esquire. One of my favorite mag­a­zines in the whole wide world.

Now you can dis­miss Coon totally or par­tially, if you want, because he is a plaintiff’s lawyer from one of the most plaintiff-friendly towns on Earth — that is if you believe the anti-plaintiff U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce (not the guys and gals who wel­come you to town and has all the great maps and brochures but the cham­ber that owns one of the news­pa­pers they pub­lish nation­ally to try and scare poten­tial plain­tiffs’ juries.) But, to par­don the bad and poor tast­ing pun, where there is smoke there’s fire — and oil in BP’s case. That is what some friends and rel­a­tives, one with a Ph.D. in geol­ogy who works in deep drilling, tell me about BP’s rep­u­ta­tion in the oil and gas indus­try. These peo­ple say, basi­cally, “BP sucks” when it comes to safety.

So say what you want about Coon­dog, but this guy has got it going on when it comes to BP. And appar­ently to liv­ing la vida!

Jun282010

Welcome clouds from Alex and I-10, you can’t get to there from here

It was nice hav­ing the clouds today that are part of TS/TD — or what­ever — Alex. It was still humid and sticky but at least the clouds shielded the sun. Hope­fully, Alex will not develop into more than a Cat 1 hur­ri­cane and will not head toward the Upper Texas Coast while all the fore­casts call for it to stay in South Texas and Mex­ico. We could use a lit­tle more rain although the show­ers and thun­der­show­ers we got today were not unwelcome.

Now for some­thing com­pletely dif­fer­ent. I was dri­ving east on I-10 just west of Vidor when I saw cars slow­ing down and quickly com­ing to a crawl. Any­one who lives around South­east Texas prob­a­bly knows I-10 has been in a state of per­pet­ual con­struc­tion for quite awhile. This is true espe­cially in spots east of Hous­ton, such as at the Trin­ity River bridge, and between Beau­mont and the Texas-Louisiana border.

So I wasn’t very taken aback when I saw a sign that said: “Left Lane Closed.” I’m sure I mut­tered an exple­tive though. But what raised my con­cious­ness to the WTF? level was then see­ing a portable road sign indi­cat­ing traf­fic should move to the left. I thought: “Huh?” Now if the left lane was to be closed shouldn’t the traf­fic shift right rather than left?

Imag­ine how meta­gro­bi­lized I was when next I came across one traf­fic sign say­ing “Left Lane Closed” in the left lane and “Right Lane Closed” in the far right lane. Just how per­plexed this all left me is a lit­tle rem­i­nis­cent of the joke about a truck­load of the­sauruses crash­ing. “Peo­ple were aston­ished, bewil­dered, bewil­dered, blown away, bowled over, con­founded, dazed, dumb­founded, flab­ber­gasted, floored, over­whelmed, shocked, star­tled, stu­pe­fied and thunderstruck.”

Yes, it even blew my mind.

It seems like a “One Lane Road” sign would have been more explana­tory in this sit­u­a­tion. But there wasn’t one and I will even­tu­ally get over it.

Jun252010

Ah, it’s so good having great hair!

A lit­tle Fri­day after­noon light­heart­ed­ness at the expense of my not-at-all-favorite-governor. Hat tip to Burnt Orange Report.

YouTube Preview Image
Jun252010

So that’s what those big a** planes are for.

The WC-130 air­craft looked fright­en­ingly huge as it ascended over the waters of the Mis­sis­sippi Sound. How could some­thing that large, fly­ing at what appeared to be such a grad­ual pace, make it off the Keesler Air Force Base run­way and over the beach high­way in Biloxi with­out falling out of the sky, I used to ask myself?

They seem too big and slow to fly but they do and those of us on the Gulf Coast are grate­ful that they do.

I never really thought that much about what the planes were doing or where they were going. Nor did the fact that I only saw these planes fly so lan­guidly when I hung out on a hot sum­mer day with my friends pro­vide a clue as to the air­crafts’ missions.

It was an Air Force-looking plane and it took off from Keesler Air Force Base in Biloxi. I was a 19-year-old sailor sta­tioned with the Seabees some 10 miles away in Gulf­port. Since the planes were fly­ing from an Air Force base, I fig­ured they were up to Air Force things.

I knew, back then, that a lot of dif­fer­ent activ­ity went on at Keesler. I got my first pair of glasses — black, horn-rimmed ones which sev­eral later would look cool if you went for the Elvis Costello look – at Keesler because the dis­pen­sary at the Seabee base didn’t have an opthamol­o­gist or even an optometrist.

My home­boy, Jonathan, who lived with his first wife and then-baby girl over in Biloxi, attended air traf­fic con­trol school at Keesler dur­ing a hitch in the Air Force. After I got back from Sea duty, one of my office sub­or­di­nates on the ship trans­ferred to Keesler to attend Chaplain’s Assis­tant school even though he was in the Navy.

But only years later would I fig­ure out that those huge, slow planes that I saw at some time dur­ing sum­mers on the Mis­sis­sippi Gulf Coast beach were so impor­tant to my life when I decided to be a p’ert-near coast resident.

Those planes I saw, but didn’t know or par­tic­u­larly care what they were for back then, were Hur­ri­cane Hunters.

The 53rd Weather Recon­nais­sance Squadron at Keesler fly the WC-130s, or Lock­heed Mar­tin WC-130J Her­cules if you want to get tech­ni­cally anal about it, into trop­i­cal sys­tems to detect vital infor­ma­tion which helps hur­ri­cane fore­cast­ers deter­mine what a storm might do and where it might go. Often the Air Force Reserve crews man­ning the air­craft will fly right into the eye of a hur­ri­cane. You might think “calm” when talk­ing about the eye until you remem­ber you have the hur­ri­cane sur­round­ing you.

This is one of those days, today, you might see one of these big slow planes take off and ever so slowly climb up into the sky over the Mis­sis­sippi Sound and its bar­rier islands. A National Hur­ri­cane Cen­ter advi­sory around noon Cen­tral Day­light Time indi­cated an Air Force recon­nais­sance plane was approach­ing a low pres­sure cen­ter between Grand Cay­man and Hon­duras. The NHC has given the sys­tem an 80 per­cent chance for trop­i­cal cyclone development.

Of course, the cable news media is all over the pos­si­bil­ity of a storm like a gecko on an insur­ance com­mer­cial. That is because of the mas­sive BP oil spill that con­tin­ues to pour into the Gulf of Mex­ico and onto land from Louisiana to Florida.

My most not-favorite CNN anchor, Rick Sanchez, was mak­ing much ado about this not-even-tropical depres­sion and the hur­ri­cane “mod­els” which are already pre­dict­ing paths for what could become the first named storm of the sea­son. If it be comes a trop­i­cal storm it would be named Alex. The weather woman on CNN is at this moment as I write this say­ing which model would be “prefer­able” as for where the storm may go. She means what would be the best track for the storm, if there is a storm, as it might affect the oil spill and limit sub­se­quent dam­age, if there is dam­age and if there is a storm. That is truly putting the dog before the pony show. The rea­son is that the mod­els of where this storm might head cur­rently extend from Tampico, Mex­ico, to Apalachicola, Florida. That’s a lot of ground, uh, water to cover and it includes the area in which I live.

In just the last five years I have been through three hur­ri­canes, a trop­i­cal storm and four or five evac­u­a­tions, if you count all those folks who came to this area from Hur­ri­cane Kat­rina until being chased away by Hur­ri­cane Rita. If I left out a storm, I apologize.

Don’t get me wrong. I am con­cerned about the BP gusher as I have been for awhile and not just for the oil-covered pel­i­cans although I hate to see the envi­ron­ment f**ked up. But I am like­wise con­cerned for my neigh­bors here on the Upper Texas Coast. That is why I am glad those building-sized, puz­zling slow Air Force-looking planes I used to see when I was a young sailor are out there fly­ing with con­fi­dence in the Gulf of Mex­ico hunt­ing hur­ri­canes. The infor­ma­tion that those air­men out of Keesler gather is impor­tant to a lot of peo­ple and prob­a­bly more folks than usual — because of the BP spill in the Gulf — await what comes from the storms that the Hur­ri­cane Hunters risk their lives to investigate.

Here is another look from AccuWeather about pos­si­ble Alex paths.

Jun232010

Sacking Mac: No banana republic US

The sack­ing of Gen. Stan­ley McChrys­tal by Pres­i­dent Obama as com­man­der of inter­na­tional forces in Afghanistan was not the only choice the CINC could make. But even if one dis­agrees with the out­come it was clearly a right choice.

Gen. Stan­ley McChrys­tal receives tips from an Afghan gov­er­nor on grow­ing a beard once his days as an active duty gen­eral are over. That might not be too long.

McChrys­tal, and his entourage to a greater degree, shot off their mouths to an irrev­er­ent writer for a Rolling Stone piece. That arti­cle said some unflat­ter­ing things about Obama and his entourage. The rest is, of course, his­tory now as Obama accepted the general’s res­ig­na­tion — the age-old way of dis­miss­ing a top gen­eral — and has appointed Iraq surge archi­tect and cur­rent Cen­tral Com­mand leader Gen. David Petraeus.

Gen. David Petraeus, at mod­i­fied “parade rest.”

The man­ner in which Obama relieved the gen­eral and the way in which McChrys­tal han­dled his fir­ing was hon­or­able, which was to be expected in proper military-civil deco­rum. I would guess that some on the right, some on the left and even some in the mid­dle may have objected to the out­come. For those peo­ple, I would ask that they bear in mind that our mil­i­tary is con­sti­tu­tion­ally led by civil­ians. For top mil­i­tary lead­ers and their staff to make dis­parag­ing state­ments in pub­lic about their chain of com­mand is not only wrong-headed in the sense that it does not con­tribute to the well-oiled mil­i­tary machine, it is also illegal.

Any buck pri­vate or sea­man recruit should remem­ber the so-call “puni­tive arti­cles” of the Uni­form Code of Mil­i­tary Jus­tice. Those are the mil­i­tary laws for which one can be pun­ished by actions rang­ing from non-judicial pun­ish­ment to court mar­tial. Recruits are taught that when a mil­i­tary mem­ber disses a gov­ern­ment offi­cial, those offenses are seen as espe­cially heinous in the eyes of a mil­i­tary that prides itself on being dif­fer­ent from mil­i­tary jun­tas found in banana republics.

Tech­ni­cally, Gen. McChrys­tal could have or still could be charged with Arti­cle 88 of the UCMJ, which pro­hibits com­mis­sioned offi­cers from talk­ing smack about gov­ern­ment offi­cials. It doesn’t come with a very heavy sen­tence and I don’t know if any offi­cer has been con­victed of it in years. In the case of senior offi­cers such as McChrys­tal, he pretty much received the max being forced to fall on his sword, although it is yet to see what hap­pens to his career or if he will retire.

Enlisted and non-commissioned offi­cers have a sim­i­lar offense although it is one that might be dif­fi­cult to sus­tain in court these days as it falls under the so-called “catch-all” Arti­cle 134, a.k.a. the Gen­eral Arti­cle, to wit, as the “Man­ual for Courts Mar­tial” says quite frequently:

“Though not specif­i­cally men­tioned in this chap­ter, all dis­or­ders and neglects to the prej­u­dice of good order and dis­ci­pline in the armed forces, all con­duct of a nature to bring dis­credit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not cap­i­tal, of which per­sons sub­ject to this chap­ter may be guilty, shall be taken cog­nizance of by a gen­eral, spe­cial, or sum­mary court-martial, accord­ing to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be pun­ished at the dis­cre­tion of that court.”

Keep in mind this arti­cle takes in the kitchen sink from “Abus­ing Pub­lic Ani­mals” to wear­ing an unau­tho­rized badge or medal.

I read the offend­ing arti­cle in Rolling Stone and found it to be mostly flat­ter­ing for McChrys­tal. He is a rare “snake-eater” Spe­cial Oper­a­tions type who rose to the high­est ranks. He is well-liked by troops and is known for “lead­ing from the front.” I did not find many of the com­ments very offen­sive at all. But I can see how they were per­ceived as being over the top because they were directed at Obama and his peo­ple. The most damn­ing com­ment I saw was in a sub­ti­tle and I am not sure that came directly from McChrystal.

One also must remem­ber that some of history’s best gen­er­als have been every­thing from reck­less to insub­or­di­nate to down­right insane.

How­ever, our Con­sti­tu­tion takes prece­dence over one indi­vid­ual no mat­ter how good a fel­low he or she may be. I hope Petraeus does as well with Afghanistan as he appeared to do with Iraq. My only ques­tion is, will he also be han­dling duties as CENTCOM com­man­der simul­ta­ne­ously with his Afghan lead­er­ship role? If so, that could be a problem.

Jun212010

No comment!

Those who have read this blog over the years know that the only way to make a com­ment is to e-mail me. My address is on the blog or if the per­son is a friend or rel­a­tive, they com­ment on my per­sonal e-mail. That is the way I like it, for a vari­ety of rea­sons. The main rea­son is I don’t have time to edit a bunch of pro­fan­ity and racist com­ments, or tin­ker with com­ments to make sure they aren’t libelous.

This Boston Globe Mag­a­zine arti­cle goes into the mind of those who con­stantly com­ment on, in this case, news sto­ries. But I would sus­pect a lot of com­ments that you get on blogs are by peo­ple such as those you will meet in what is a very good, although fairly long arti­cle. (Duh, it’s a mag­a­zine article!)

Jun182010

Barton not the lone ranger. House group including E. Texas reps bemoan a “Chicago-style” shakedown

Oh this is rich.

I found this press release by a con­gres­sional cau­cus of right-wingers. Among them are Joe Bar­ton, but also are most, if not all, of the Lone Star State’s GOP House members.

The Repub­li­can Study Com­mit­tee called the fund agreed to by Pres­i­dent Obama and BP chief Tony Hay­ward “a Chicago-style shake­down.” I have yet to see any apol­ogy from this cau­cus. Even more rich, I’ve not seen any apolo­gies from our own East Texas con­gres­sional mem­bers. Among these mem­bers are Rep. Ted Poe, whose dis­trict includes the Upper Texas Coast and part of the Hous­ton metro area; Rep. Kevin Brady, who rep­re­sents the heart of East Texas; and Rep. Louie Gohmert, the con­gress­man for the north­ern por­tion of East Texas.

I haven’t heard any­one men­tion this yet, but it looks like Bar­ton wasn’t the lone idiot in sug­gest­ing BP were vic­tims of extor­tion by our government.