iNeedahealthysnack

Maybe I’m just too far out of the techno gen­er­a­tion to grasp the impor­tance of today’s announce­ment by Apple, dur­ing which CEO Steve Jobs unveiled their new tablet com­puter. I mean, I own a lap­top and use it exten­sively. I have a cell that can take pic­tures, video, respond to voice com­mands such as “roll over and play dead.” I have a desk­top in stor­age. I got your dig­i­tal cam­era. Just last week I was given an elec­tronic device that mea­sures my blood sugar. Also, my work com­puter is a tablet-style which would pro­vide me tons of plea­sure if only I could blow it to King­dom Come with a Smith and Wes­son .500 Mag­num.

Surely a .50-caliber revolver promised as a “hunt­ing hand­gun for any game walk­ing” could take care of that screwed up Fujitsu tablet PC I have to use that often acts as if it is on a con­tin­ual for­ti­fied wine bender.

I even started out using Apple’s Macs.

But I don’t have an iPod. Maybe that’s why I don’t get the sig­nif­i­cance of the iPad.

I do under­stand what the new tablet does and it’s rel­a­tively cheap price start­ing at $499 instead of the expected $1,000. It appar­ently com­bines the tech­nol­ogy and oper­a­tion of Apple’s iPod, com­put­ers, e-book read­ers and cell phones. Smart, func­tional, rel­a­tively inex­pen­sive and deliv­ered by a genius of a man who sur­vived liver can­cer after get­ting a trans­plant. It’s a hell of a story, no doubt.

What it isn’t, is the Sec­ond Com­ing of the Almighty. The head­line on Huff­in­g­ton Post this after­noon took up half of my lap­top screen.

Maybe my lack of enthu­si­asm stems from becom­ing com­puter lit­er­ate only in my 30s and 40s. Or, as I said, maybe it’s because I don’t have an iPod. Some pun­dits remarked that they believed the iPad announce­ment would over­shadow Pres­i­dent Obama’s first State of the Union address this evening. Go fig­ure that one.

Now if some­one came up with a com­puter that was really func­tional it would be a dif­fer­ent story. I’m talk­ing an android-in-a-box. A com­puter that would make meals or snacks for you that were both deli­cious and per­fectly healthy accord­ing to your dietary and taste bud needs. If it mixed your adult bev­er­ages just to your spec­i­fi­ca­tions. If it was a com­puter that could pull up the five-shot .500-magnum and do a Dirty Harry imi­ta­tion in the event unwel­come intrud­ers were in your abode. If a com­puter was intro­duced that was just com­pletely out of this world in its func­tions, would heal the sick, feed the starv­ing, stop global warm­ing and save the whales, then yeah, 72-point head­lines and per­haps an extra edi­tion if news­pa­pers are still around.

But the iPad, the little-bitty tablet PC that mys­tery and hype has even me talk­ing about it, I just don’t under­stand the hub, Bub.

Wal-Mart’s “Speedy Checkout”: The ultimate oxymoron?

My check­ing out at Wal-Mart this after­noon must have set a new per­sonal worst. I fig­ure that it took me an aver­age of 1.3 min­utes to self-scan each of the 13 items I purchased.

The usual Wal-Mart self-scan prob­lems reared their ugly head. I couldn’t get items to scan, no way, no how. I tried enter­ing the bar code and it failed to reg­is­ter the item each time. The machine told me to take the item out of the bag and put it on the scan­ner. I called the self-scan assis­tance per­son about four times.

"I hate you, you @#&%*&#&%@!!"

I hate you, you @#&%*&#&%@!!”

I see more prob­lems with Wal-Mart self-scan machines than at any other retailer that uses them. I don’t know what causes the prob­lems. It seems like — for one thing — the lit­tle glass cover over the scan­ner usu­ally looks smudged and smeared, as if it needs clean­ing. Whether that causes items not to reg­is­ter, I don’t know because I am not tech­ni­cally savvy about those machines or almost any other type of machinery.

But I do know I expe­ri­ence prob­lems prac­ti­cally every time I use Wal-Mart’s self-scan. I also hear oth­ers com­plain. Go to “Google” and type in “Wal-Mart” “self-scan check­out” and see what kind of com­plaints you will see.

Why not go to a reg­u­lar cashier and check out? Why it is for the exact rea­son I use self-scan machines in the first place. Usu­ally there are long lines. If the cashier needs assis­tance with an item there is no telling how long it will take him or her to get it. If there is a com­puter prob­lem of any kind with the reg­is­ter, it is like a Level I national emer­gency. And there are indi­vid­ual com­plaints that make me veer toward the U-Scan rather than the cashier.

Wal-Mart should, by now, real­ize their self-scan machines are for the most part, junk. The com­pany should do some­thing about it. Because one of these days, sure as shootin’, some­one who already has had the Mother of all bad days is going to try to check out at the Wal-Mart self-scan and encounter major prob­lems that make him (prob­a­bly but could be her) berserk and he is going to take a ham­mer or shovel or some tool he was about to pur­chase and start wal­lop­ing the machine until it turns into some­thing unrec­og­niz­able. The shop­per will, of course, be arrested and taken to jail.

Such inci­dents ulti­mately wind up on the news and one has to think Wal-Mart is going to end up the bad guy with such an inci­dent. That can’t be good, unless Wal-Mart thinks any pub­lic­ity is good pub­lic­ity. Per­son­ally, I don’t think a com­pany that has become as huge as it is did so by employ­ing such a phi­los­o­phy. I could be wrong, but I don’t think so.

The better mousetrap. Just when you don’t need it.

Some­one always seems eager to build the bet­ter mouse­trap. It cer­tainly wouldn’t be good news to all the mice were it not that the term is used mostly as a metaphor. But peo­ple are striv­ing to improve objects, to make them bet­ter, to come up with an “improved” ver­sion. All kinds of rea­sons exist for the need to improve but one with a cyn­i­cal mind would sus­pect money is a great fac­tor. It does seem that way with the “wares” of com­put­ers. You know–hardware, soft­ware, under­wear. Well, who knows if com­put­ers have undies but per­haps you get the point.

Every year or so some tech com­pany comes up with an improved ver­sion of this or that. Look at Microsoft. You got your Win­dows, Win­dows 2000, Win­dows XP, Win­dows Vista, Win­dows to the World, Dirty Win­dows and Closed Windows.

But some­thing as sim­ple as Yahoo Mail. It’s been the same for thou­sands of years in Inter­net time. Now they are get­ting around to improv­ing it, to change it. And wouldn’t you know that change has to take place at pre­cisely the time you most need that lit­tle piece of tech­no­log­i­cal wiz­ardry to flaw­lessly per­form the mis­sion that it has done so well for so long? The prob­lem is that you have to take time now to learn, or retrain, as to how it functions.

Maybe some­one will come up with a bet­ter ver­sion of time. That’s it: Time 2.0. It sounds down­right techie.

We got ice. We got Bluetooth. We got rich.

The Super Duper Mart (Not it’s real name) is one of the “urban” type con­ve­nience stores. Urban is just a euphemism, code word or what­ever you want to say to dress up a pig with lip­stick for ghetto, po’, prob­a­bly 40 dif­fer­ent shades of skin color includ­ing white folks who have at least one major mechan­i­cal dif­fi­culty with their car that can’t be fixed until at least the next payday.

Any­way, that’s the kind of neigh­bor­hood I live in but this store is actu­ally down the road a ways.

My guess is that the clerk is from one of those ‘stan’ coun­tries. He has a Blue­tooth stuck in his ear that he talks from every wak­ing minute of the day.

The store has an ice dis­penser where you can get a ginor­mous cup of ice for 50 cents. There is no car­bon­ated soft drink machine in the place. A lit­tle light bulb goes off in my head. They want you to buy an energy drink, or soft drink or bot­tle of water marked up about 20 cents more than at Valero or 7–11.

I stopped in to buy gas but I also needed hydra­tion, so I got the Gnor­mous Ice (GI) and filled it up with water from a sink.

The clerk looked at me like I just launched a Hell­fire from a Preda­tor at his ’04 Camry.

You got that water from the sink?” he asked.

That’s where I get it at home.” I said.

I thought about lec­tur­ing him about how many bot­tled water bot­tles you see say­ing: “Source: Hous­ton Munic­i­pal Water Sys­tem.” or some­thing like that. I real­ized that from where the water came and my well-being had noth­ing to do with “Stan’s” query.

Speak­ing of Blue­tooths, or money-grubbing idiots, I was think­ing of the encounter with the lady at the Radio Hut the other day. Radio Hut. Hut? Like a shack? Get it?

An attor­ney was sup­posed to call me last week for an affi­davit as a wit­ness in a labor dis­pute. I only have a cell phone and didn’t believe I had a head­phone set. I fig­ured I might need one because the lawyer said the process would prob­a­bly take an hour.

I went into Radio Hut and asked the woman behind the counter about a head­set for my phone. She imme­di­ately took me to the Blue­tooth sets. She said every man­u­fac­turer is going to Blue­tooth. She looked at my phone. She said there wasn’t even a place to plug in a head­set there.

All the Blue­tooth stuff was from $35 and above at Radio Shack Hut.

EEK EEK ALERT: DOES THIS SEEM TO BE MISSING SOMETHING? WELL, IF IT DOES IT IS? WHAT HAPPENED TO THE REST OF IT?

So any­way, I go to my truck and — to make a long story short — find the head­phone set. Blue­tooth this.

It seems like some­one is always out there try­ing to scam you. That’s how you get rich, I guess. Buy ice. Buy Blue­tooth. I think maybe some cap­i­tal­is­tic pig­gie must have stolen the bot­tom of this is why it stopped at the Blue­tooths for $35-plus. But oh well.

And I swear, the rest of what I had writ­ten was pretty good too. Maybe I can buy back what’s miss­ing from my post. I’m sure it would cost me more than a GI. But prob­a­bly not much more than a Bluetooth.

Is there a right side of the bed on which to wake?

 Paul from Tokyo, my IT con­sul­tant extra­or­di­naire, tried to teach me about tags over the week­end but my feet started swelling and it freaked me out so I didn’t learn a whole lot. Ah Paul, it might be awhile before I can snatch the peb­ble from your hand. Nonethe­less, those red (for now at least) words which are of unequal size on the right side­bar are the tags I am talk­ing about. Give them a poke and see where they take you. Neat huh?

 A prod­uct of a cou­ple of middle-aged col­lege friends on a week­end, one in Japan one in Beau­mont, Texas. Much zany fun.

 Just a short thought. If I had more time today I would look up the ori­gin of the say­ing: “He/she woke up on the wrong side of the bed.”

 I haven’t ever fig­ured this one out though hav­ing gone through rela­tion­ships which require 1) a bed and 2) a side of a bed, or if it is a really com­fort­able rela­tion­ship 3) a bed, a side of a bed and a side of fries, I know what it means to wake up on the wrong side of the bed. It means a lot of unpleasantness.

 This morn­ing I didn’t wake up on the wrong side of the bed exactly. I sleep by myself so the only prob­lem with wak­ing up on the wrong side of the bed is hav­ing to decide whether I want to roll back over to get up and go to the bath­room or get up and walk around the bed to go to the bath­room. Because that’s usu­ally what I do when I wake up. I know, I know, too much information.

 This morn­ing I woke up irri­tated and it wouldn’t mat­ter what side of the bed from which I exited the bed.

 About 5 a.m. I woke up and couldn’t sleep. Prob­a­bly some time about 6:45 a.m. I drifted off into light slum­ber when all of a sud­den, that phone ring from my T-Mobile — you know that sweet, sickening, bell-like tune, that makes you want to do a Qua­si­modo – sang out: “De De De De De, De De De De De, Come answer me. F**k you let me be.”

 So I get up. I look at the screen and see no famil­iar name but I see famil­iar num­bers, which are ones ema­nat­ing from my part-time job’s home office in Dal­las. I answer the phone and it goes: “Screec­c­c­ch­hhh, Squaaaaaannkkk, Deetleleteletlee.” I think: “Why is my office send­ing my cell phone a fax at 6:57 a.m.?” Actu­ally, the bet­ter ques­tion is why is my office send­ing my cell phone a fax at all? I don’t have a fax at home.

 I tried to call my boss’ num­ber. His voice mail said it was Fri­day and he was in the office. The last part might be true, but I know good and well today is Mon­day. I try call­ing his boss. She didn’t say what day it was on her voice mail but she was on voice mail, so… I hung up.

 I got back in bed and “De de de de de De de de de de.” And I thrust my right thumb harshly down upon the lit­tle red tele­phone with the sign of the beast, or what­ever that is, above it.

 Back to bed where I had decided to alarm myself at 8:30 instead of 8. If I am a lit­tle late to my office, it’s the main office’s fault for fax­ing my cell phone. I fall asleep about 8:10 and my dying-cow alarm knocks me out of bed, ready­ing me to either birth or bury what­ever calf that might be on hand. Thank good­ness, like always at least not for some 25 years, no cows.

 Not long after arriv­ing at work our monthly, regional tele­con­fer­ence began. At the end where Q & A are bandied about, I asked my boss who or why tried to fax my cell phone. He said we would talk about it after the con­fer­ence. It turned out to be no big deal. The main office was try­ing to fax my col­league who works out of her home. The unan­tic­i­pated rings really didn’t aggra­vate me. I  guess maybe if the mis­take had been made by some­one I despised for some rea­son that ticked me off I would have been really pissed.

 But there was no one to really get angry with so I am instead just left a lit­tle tired after the whole ordeal. I can’t help but won­der what the reac­tion would have been with a bed-partner? Sheesh. Recall­ing some of the femme fire­balls who at one time staked their claim to a side of my bed, chances are the sit­u­a­tion would not have been as mel­low as I now feel look­ing back on the episode.

 Maybe that whole “wak­ing up on the wrong side of the bed” relates to sleep­ing with some­one, as in a rela­tion­ship. I got to look that whole thing up as it will nag at me like an old girl­friend. But I think I should first take a nap.

Oh and PS, New­ton whipped/spanked/beat (sound­ing a lit­tle too S & M here?) Corrigan-Camden Fri­day night by a score of 40–21

How do you spell scam: “Internet”

It seems as if the Inter­net has proved the best plat­form ever for pro­mot­ing scams. It appears that is the pri­mary rea­son for the Inter­net is to sep­a­rate one’s money from their wal­let. Keep peo­ple online long enough and maybe they’ll buy some­thing. Jesus Christ.

Sud­denly, I have more faith than ever in car dealers.

Cell or no cell?

 Per­haps because we move kind of slow down here in Texas is the rea­son why trends which have taken place else­where don’t always get to the Lone Star State posthaste. Take, for instance, bans on using cell phones while driving.

 A new law will take effect on Sept. 1 in Texas — on a local-option basis — which bans the use of cell phones in school zones. By local-option, I mean that the gov­ern­ing juris­dic­tion of where the school is located has to first approve it. If it is in a city, the city must approve it and county com­mis­sion­ers must give their approval if it is in an unin­cor­po­rated area.

 I sup­pose the Texas Leg­is­la­ture and Gov. Good Hair Perry, in their infi­nite wis­dom, decided they didn’t want to get get stuck as being the ones who out­lawed using a cell alto­gether while dri­ving. That is, no mat­ter how many peo­ple get killed because of peo­ple yakking on their phones and not watch­ing what they are doing.

 One thought has piqued my curios­ity. Since Moth­ers Against Drunk Dri­ving is largely respon­si­ble for one no longer even feel­ing they can drink one beer and drive with­out wor­ry­ing about a DUI charge, I won­der their thoughts on cell use and driving?

 Admit­tedly, I have not had a chance to do exten­sive research but in a quick search of the MADD Web page all I could find was a res­o­lu­tion sup­port­ing the use of cell phones in vehi­cles for report­ing drunk dri­vers. I won­der where they really stand?

 Although the fed­eral high­way safety agency tried to sit on stud­ies show­ing even hands-free use of cell phones is deadly, other stud­ies show those talk­ing on the phone are four times as likely to crash and are as likely to wreck as dri­vers with a blood-alcohol con­tent of .08.

 I admit that I some­times use my phone while dri­ving. It is a habit that I am try­ing to break just as see­ing — when I was as a fire­fighter — numer­ous folks dead who didn’t wear seat­belts got me in the habit of wear­ing one. Sad to admit, I once used to drink and drive. Hell, just about every Texan who both drank and who dri­ved cher­ished the long stretch when the state had no open con­tainer law or at least one that had no teeth. Times have changed now. You can get tick­eted for an open con­tainer and can be arrested for DUI for almost hav­ing alco­hol on your breath. Don’t get me started on those who can serve and die for their coun­try unable to get a drink because they aren’t 21!

 And so it goes. My lib­er­tar­ian friends don’t like the idea of gov­ern­ment play­ing nanny, and I don’t like it a whole lot either. But safety aside, a lot of prac­ti­cal util­ity comes from laws like man­dat­ing seat belts, DUI and ban­ning cell phones. This includes money spent on insur­ance pre­mi­ums, taxes we pay to sup­port hos­pi­tals, worker pro­duc­tiv­ity (hav­ing your worker show up instead of he or she being in jail, the hos­pi­tal or the morgue), to list a few.

 So, I imag­ine one day com­pletely giv­ing up talk­ing on a cell and dri­ving. Unlike many peo­ple I see every day, I don’t stay on the phone from the time I get in my auto until I dis­em­bark, and then some.

 I can live with­out dri­ving and cell chat­ting; per­haps even live because I am not dri­ving and talk­ing on the phone.

Don’t tweet as I say and don’t tweet as I do

The Marine Corps has issued orders for its folks to stay clear of social net­work­ing sites such as Twit­ter and Face­book.  CNN reports that the Marines appar­ently are wor­ried that a slip of a lip might sink a ship which would mean Marines would have to swim from the Halls of Mon­tezuma to the shores of Tripoli. Never mind that the Chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen has his own Twit­ter feed. He had 4,551 fol­low­ers as of this after­noon. The lat­est feed says:

“Obvi­ously we need to find right bal­ance between secu­rity and trans­parency. We are work­ing on that. But am I still going to tweet? You bet.”

RHIP ?(Rank hath its priv­i­leges). YBYA (You bet your ass).

Back in service a day later

For slightly less than 24 hours I have been off the Inter­net due to a bro­ken wire­less modem. For­get that I didn’t know that I had insur­ance for dam­aged wire­less equip­ment. I had no idea that such equip­ment could be deliv­ered within 24 hours. I sup­pose that is because the insur­ance com­pany was the mover behind the cur­tain rather than Verizon.

I sup­pose that when one sees he or she is spend­ing more time on the phone with peo­ple from the wire­less Inter­net provider and/or the cell phone com­pany, then per­haps the deal that has been cho­sen isn’t work­ing out so well. Unfor­tu­nately for me, it doesn’t look like I have a choice. Ver­i­zon has the best wire­less Inter­net ser­vice in my area.

When that ser­vice is work­ing prop­erly it is super and with excel­lent speeds. The prob­lem is con­sis­tency. I sup­pose I shouldn’t get bent out of shape because my Inter­net fails right in the mid­dle of doing some­thing impor­tant or time-sensitive. My wire­less is still 10 times bet­ter than what I have to put up with using dial-up for my gov­ern­ment computer.

Then again, I don’t have to pay a monthly charge for my dial-up ser­vice which pow­ers my part-time job’s equip­ment online.

This all makes me won­der if cell and wire­less Inter­net ser­vice will some­day be some­where next to flaw­less? With com providers, such as Ver­i­zon, trim­ming more and more work­ers form its rolls it cer­tainly seems that is a dream of some­thing far, far into the future.

The password is …

Look at them. A page of jum­bled let­ters, num­bers and spe­cial char­ac­ters I have writ­ten down on sev­eral dif­fer­ent pages . It’s all for the sake of com­puter security.

I have about 15 dif­fer­ent pass­words for work-related sites, or should I say, my part-time work-related sites. Then I  prob­a­bly have another 25 or 30 more pass­words for per­sonal use or for my other line of work.

Now, I must admit that con­trary to all the warn­ings, I do some­times use the same pass­words to access dif­fer­ent pages. I am warned over and over not to do that. But have mercy on a poor soul as me who does good to remem­ber the gro­cery list.

I would almost be will­ing to bet that my num­ber of pass­words are even lower than many other com­puter users. But there are still too many pass­words that fly out in front of me, leav­ing me dazed and confused.

Per­haps some­one out there in the com­put­er­sphere is work­ing  on a way to min­i­mize pass­words. I mean, some sites can remem­ber your pass­word and login name. And then some sites say they can but don’t really do it, like my Ver­i­zon Wire­less account. Maybe we should get Sally Struthers to do a TV com­mer­cial ask­ing for bucks for devel­op­ing a password-free world like she did seek­ing help for all those impov­er­ished for­eign children.

Please we need to limit pass­words before peo­ple go stark rav­ing mad. Time is run­ning out!