Empire or not, read this book

Is the United States of Amer­ica an empire?

One could have a lot of fun and spend a con­sid­er­able amount of time debat­ing, research­ing, learn­ing or what­ever one might fancy in an effort to deter­mine an answer to that ques­tion. Even then, ulti­mately, an answer could be lacking.

Author Robert D. Kaplan, national cor­re­spon­dent for the Atlantic Monthly mag­a­zine, raises this ques­tion which keeps pop­ping up from time-to-time in our Amer­i­can dis­course, in his book “Impe­r­ial Grunts.” But prob­a­bly more impor­tant Kaplan writes in his book that today’s irreg­u­lar U.S. mil­i­tary forces — the Marines and spe­cial forces — are an extremely capa­ble and amaz­ing instru­ment of a for­eign pol­icy whether inten­tion­ally or not crowns the Amer­i­can Empire.

Kaplan trav­els to global spots such as Mon­go­lia, the Philip­pines, Colom­bia, Yemen, Afghanistan and Iraq where he looks at how the nation-building that U.S. spe­cial mil­i­tary forces are doing is as cen­tral to empire-building as mil­i­tary might. For those who thought “win­ning the hearts and minds” of a peo­ple ended after U.S. troops tried it in Viet­nam, Kaplan deliv­ers a more mod­ern view of how this is being done as rou­tine mil­i­tary fare.

Empire and nation-building, for­eign pol­icy and the George W. Bush-era ver­sion of mil­i­tary usage, how­ever, are not as impor­tant and as aptly por­trayed in this book than the author’s insight­ful expo­si­tion of the mostly young men who are at the heart of the new Amer­i­can military.

Kaplan draws the dis­tinc­tion between the “Big Army,” in which tons of reg­u­la­tions and lay­ers of bureau­cracy rule their world and the small teams and ease of oper­a­tion which is the hall­mark or the U.S. Army spe­cial oper­a­tions. At the very heart of the lat­ter is a soci­ety of sol­diers rang­ing in rank from major down to senior non-commissioned offi­cers — tra­di­tion­ally from the reli­gious South or U.S. Heart­land — whose most impor­tant attrib­utes are their abil­ity to adapt and adjust than strictly their use of M-4s or explo­sives. The spe­cial oper­a­tors’ pen­e­trat­ing knowl­edge of local peo­ples who they must both teach and some­times fight is also an impor­tant aspect of the Amer­i­can arse­nal. As one spe­cial forces sol­dier in Afghanistan said of the Afghans: “These peo­ple like guns and fight­ing. Give them beer and a mobile home and they’d be just like us.”

Also very dif­fer­ent in books about today’s mil­i­tary, Kaplan presents an almost uncen­sored view not seen in most media of the U.S. national guard troops who also serve as spe­cial oper­a­tors. These citizen-soldiers are more open about their view of the mil­i­tary world because it is not their full-time job. One guards­man, for instance, said his civil­ian job was just a way he could pay for his spe­cial forces habit.

There are a num­ber of Kaplan’s con­clu­sions of which I am either unsure of or with which I dis­agree. But this is one of the best books I have read about today’s sol­diers. I sup­pose my rea­son for say­ing so has to do with my past expe­ri­ence cov­er­ing the Army as a reporter. Kaplan had the lux­ury — not a very apt word if you read about some of his lodg­ing in the book — of access­ing high-ranking SF types who helped him into some oth­er­wise dif­fi­cult places to report on these sol­diers. Once he got to these places he was on his own and had to win the trust of the oper­a­tors. But he also was able to stay with the sol­diers for extended peri­ods and build trust.

Thus, Kaplan had a more hon­est and open view of what was going on. This in sharp con­trast to my hav­ing inter­acted with sol­diers who were usu­ally under the watch­ful eye of some pub­lic infor­ma­tion offi­cer types. I did my best but you can guess what makes much bet­ter reading.

If you are look­ing for their opin­ions of what the sol­diers of the empire-or-not do, this is the book. If you want to know about their feel­ings for things other than work, then you should look elsewhere.