Monthly Archives: September 2009

Is more less in the school hours debate?

 Pres­i­dent Obama has likely added to the list of those who aren’t very happy with him. This time it is the small fry.

 Obama wants kids to spend more time in the class­room. This includes longer school days and open­ing on week­ends to give kids a safe place to go. The idea is that U.S. stu­dents are behind those in other coun­tries because of the fewer hours Amer­i­can kids spend in class.

 Arne Dun­can, Obama’s edu­ca­tion sec­re­tary, pointed out that today’s edu­ca­tional sys­tem is based on an agrar­ian soci­ety and that not many kids are work­ing the fields. While some stud­ies have shown that more hours is con­ducive to bet­ter learn­ing in cer­tain sub­jects, adding hours — and how they are added — is some­thing that is wrapped in mul­ti­ple social and eco­nomic issues.

 It’s true not a lot of fam­i­lies can be found out work­ing the fields these days. Like­wise, not a lot of cou­ples raise a slew of kids just because the extra help is needed in the fields.

 But some fam­i­lies do work the fields both those that are des­per­ate for money and the fam­ily farm­ers who would like to pass their way of life and assets to their offspring.

 Then one must con­sider fam­ily vaca­tions — for those that take them. I can’t recall hav­ing ever taken one as a kid unless you con­sider load­ing the fam­ily up in a pickup one Sun­day and vis­it­ing Hous­ton. I don’t men­tion that with resent­ment because it is sim­ply some­thing I didn’t dwell on as a kid, so I see no rea­son to do so now. That doesn’t mean my sum­mers were void of fun.

 The point is that no one fam­ily is the same and the time schools now give more for fam­ily and stu­dent recre­ation is used in a host of dif­fer­ent ways.

 Speak­ing of recre­ation, I won­der how Dis­ney­world and Six Flags would make out should kids have short­ened vaca­tions? And what about day care busi­nesses if schools days were length­ened? The par­ents might come out bet­ter finan­cially not hav­ing to shell out a lot of bucks for day care. Who knows?

 This is not the first time such a sub­ject has sur­faced. I remem­ber it being talked about more than 40 years ago when I was a kid. I wasn’t the idea’s biggest fan back then. The idea has also been renewed sev­eral times in my more recent years.

 Per­son­ally, I like the struc­ture of classes and school cal­en­dar one finds in col­leges and uni­ver­si­ties. I refer to tak­ing classes at dif­fer­ent times of the day with class hours vary­ing in length and days, and hav­ing the abil­ity to either take or not take a vaca­tion, or take one-half of the sum­mer off. I am sure that would require way too many kinks to work out.

 But imple­ment­ing the types of changes Obama is talk­ing about would also require quite a bit of upheaval. The social and eco­nomic ram­i­fi­ca­tion are such that it seems the only way it could be effec­tive would be mak­ing such changes on a national basis. And Amer­i­cans are pretty pro­tec­tive when it comes to local con­trol in school matters.

 While there is merit in more hours of school there sim­i­larly can be great value in time off. Spend­ing time  with one’s fam­ily or just chillin’ and recharg­ing the bat­ter­ies or even play­ing with your imag­i­nary friends thus devel­op­ing a bet­ter sense of imag­i­na­tion can all be worth­while. It just depends on how it all is being done and ensur­ing par­ents are ensur­ing the kids are respon­si­bly overseen.

 The pres­i­dent has got a lot on his plate. This is one area he should leave for the local schools.

Facebook poll a feloniously stupid action

 One has to won­der about the intel­lec­tual acu­ity of soci­etal mem­bers who engage in totally over-the-edge Inter­net dis­course for all the world to see.

 I speak of the recent flap over a poll placed by a third party on Face­book that asked if the Pres­i­dent of the United States should be killed. That such a hor­ren­dous post would be put up by some dips**t for mil­lions of read­ers is stu­pid beyond imag­i­na­tion on more than one level. Some 700 responses were received before the offend­ing poll was removed by Face­book. Left out in all the sto­ries I have read were the num­bers vot­ing in the affir­ma­tive. We thus have lit­tle knowl­edge whether the omis­sion was a ges­ture of good taste or some­thing to do with the ongo­ing inves­ti­ga­tion of the inci­dent by the Secret Ser­vice. It would be kind of instruc­tive to know.

 Given that a per­son or per­sons are stu­pid enough to post some­thing so obscene makes me think there are peo­ple who are as equally moronic that they would answer online in favor of the question. 

 Now I don’t know if all Face­book polls are cre­ated equally but I see quite a few voted on by my Face­book friends that are exhib­ited in plain view on their sites. But even if the poll allowed for some smidgen of anonymity, do you think that maybe author­i­ties like the Secret Ser­vice might just find a way to crack that secrecy via war­rants and var­i­ous legal niceties?

 It doesn’t mat­ter if you were jok­ing — and if you were jok­ing I can’t imag­ine any­one with the sense of humor to laugh at such bar­bar­ity — if you were stu­pid enough to vote on that poll and answered some­thing other than “no” it seems like you should be due a visit by some scary look­ing dudes wear­ing suits and dark glasses. And that is the way it should be.

 Some actions do not rise to the level of felo­nious stu­pid­ity. I say post­ing this poll on Face­book, and vot­ing at all, but at the very least vot­ing “yes” or “yes if he cuts my health care” is griev­ously stupid.

Where do they get these nicknames?

 Show me a ser­ial bank rob­ber these days and I will likely find you some strange nick­name made up for that per­son or persons.

 I don’t know whether these names come from the FBI agent who serves as media liai­son in the larger divi­sion offices or whether the bureau has a com­puter that gen­er­ates monikers in the way ran­dom gen­er­a­tors do on some Web sites. Need­less to say, some of these which I found today while look­ing through the FBI’s Hous­ton Divi­sion press releases were amusing.

sweatin' The prize goes to the “Sweatin’ to the Oldies Bandit.”

 Actu­ally, the alleged bank rob­ber reminds me more of an over­weight and unmasked Klaatu

"Klaatu barada nikto"

Klaatu barada nikto”

 from “The Day the Earth Stood Still” than some Richard Sim­mons devo­tee. Hi-ho Sil­ver (above) robbed two Hous­ton banks in late August within less than an hour’s time. No idle hands here.

 FBI agents are as well on the look for another busy bank rob­ber, this one dubbed “The Grandma Ban­dit.” Now I would be will­ing to bet this “grandma” would have appre­ci­ated a more flat­ter­ing nickname.

"You could use some castor oil and I could use all your money"

You could use some cas­tor oil and I could use all your money”

On Fri­day Granny allegedly robbed two banks — both Com­pass Banks — in a time span of about an hour. What’s with these fast rob­beries? I guess that like a rolling stone, these ban­dits don’t care to gather any moss, or coppers.

 

 Finally, I think the FBI were scrap­ing the bot­tom of the bar­rel com­ing up with this name, The Déjà Vu Ban­dit.

"This is all too familiar"
This is all too familiar”

 He was so named because he robbed the same bank, on the same street, while wear­ing the same shirt, although the rob­beries were on dif­fer­ent days. Well, what can you say? All good ban­dits have to have their lucky “bank rob­bing shirt.” And as far as rob­bing the same company’s banks on the same street, this alleged crook is just abid­ing by the well-worn prin­ci­ple of “stick­ing with what they know.”

 Weird.

What does a good Texas governor cost?

 Tex­ans for Pub­lic Jus­tice on Tues­day released another of its ever-enlightening reports on cam­paign finance. This report focuses on the $28 mil­lion raised for the bat­tle supreme for the Texas GOP governor’s nom­i­na­tion in 2010 between Gov. Rick “Good­hair” Perry and U.S. Sen. Kay “Give me a ‘G,’ give me an ‘O,’ give me a ‘P’” Bai­ley Hutchison.

  The most recent state finan­cial dis­clo­sure reports indi­cated Hutchi­son raised about $14.8 mil­lion and Perry, slightly less, at $14.4 mil­lion. TPJ says there are caveats to these fig­ures, however.

 Perry has been rais­ing cam­paign cash since tak­ing office since 2000. That is with the excep­tion of a six-month period sur­round­ing the bien­nial leg­isla­tive ses­sions dur­ing which state offi­cials are pro­hib­ited by law from tak­ing contributions.

 Hutchison’s mon­e­tary fig­ure reflects the period between Decem­ber 2008 — when she named a state cam­paign trea­surer – and July 2009. But Hutchi­son also trans­ferred an addi­tional $7.9 mil­lion from her fed­eral sen­ate war chest to her state cam­paign funds.

 A few mil­lion dol­lars here and another few mil­lion there and we’re talk­ing a lot of money.

 S.W.T. Lan­ham, elected Texas gov­er­nor in 1902 and 1904, oversaw early cam­paign reform laws includ­ing the require­ment of fil­ing cam­paign expen­di­tures. Lan­ham spent $20 on his last cam­paign. Then again he didn’t have to deal with the cost of jet planes (or planes for that mat­ter), or tele­vi­sion ads play­ing statewide and in some of the country’s major mar­kets. Of course, there was no TV or com­mer­cial radio. And the Inter-what?

 Many of those peo­ple who rant about cam­paign finance at either the state or fed­eral lev­els often aim their invec­tive at the indus­try, or orga­ni­za­tion or even the per­son. That influence-peddling, legal or not, has become one of the major obsta­cles to gov­ern­ing raises lit­tle doubt.

 But it should be both­er­some enough to most peo­ple except those who make a profit off expen­sive elec­tions that such enor­mous amounts of cash go toward elec­tions. It’s the money, stupid.

 How much money will be raised through both the Demo­c­ra­tic and GOP pri­maries for gov­er­nor in Texas? Then comes the gen­eral elec­tion. What will be the final tally for the entire 2010 elec­tion for governor? There are wide­spread pre­dic­tions of another record-breaking year for rais­ing cash to buy the Texas governor’s seat.

 The mind-numbing amounts of money raised and spent for offices pro­vide com­merce for some, but can any­one say with cer­tainty that the cash is spread around to many? Well, one could argue, it pays off in the end for the indi­vid­ual donors who seek time with elected offi­cials to make their case for this or that. Of course, if such influ­ence pro­vides rot­ten results that help only a few, then we pro­ceed, straight back to square one.

 There is lit­tle rea­son to hope that the laws will even­tu­ally bar the ever greater amounts of mil­lions of dol­lars which infuse campaigns. Americans seem will­ing to wait for the crit­i­cal mass. Wait until the waters over­flow — like in New Orleans dur­ing Kat­rina – and fix it then.

 But one has to won­der. Will Tex­ans have a bet­ter qual­ity gov­er­nor — who spends mil­lions upon mil­lions of dol­lars — in office after the 2010 elec­tion than it did with S.W.T. Lan­ham who spent a mere 20 bucks to get elected?

scuse me for mo Moammar

  Isn’t two days of Moam­mar Gad­hafi a lit­tle much?

  Well, maybe it is but I didn’t get enough sleep last night — per­haps sub­con­sciously wor­ried I might have night­mares about the Libyan strong man throw­ing things at me — so I am tired and thus want to make this short.

  But really, who would have thought that Gad­hafi would have pro­vided so much comic relief with his 90-some-odd-minute-mind-numbing-speech at the UN Gen­eral Assem­bly. I mean, the guy wore out an interpreter.

   One of the fun­ni­est com­ments I heard over the Gad­hafi speech: “Where is Kanye West when you need him?”

Pitch this Moammar!

Libyan leader Moam­mar Gad­hafi is like a bad penny. He just never seems to go away. At today’s United Nations Gen­eral Assem­bly he was up at the podium blast­ing the UN Secu­rity Coun­cil for … some­thing. Truth be told, it was kind of hard fol­low­ing what he said, even with trans­la­tors speak­ing per­fectly good Eng­lish. Gad­hafi also has cre­ated a stir around New York try­ing to find a place to pitch his tent. Don­ald Trump has come up with a place. Of course, a lot of peo­ple would just as soon he pitch his tent in the mid­dle of the Atlantic Ocean, while oth­ers feel Hell would be just the right spot for him.

The better mousetrap. Just when you don’t need it.

Some­one always seems eager to build the bet­ter mouse­trap. It cer­tainly wouldn’t be good news to all the mice were it not that the term is used mostly as a metaphor. But peo­ple are striv­ing to improve objects, to make them bet­ter, to come up with an “improved” ver­sion. All kinds of rea­sons exist for the need to improve but one with a cyn­i­cal mind would sus­pect money is a great fac­tor. It does seem that way with the “wares” of com­put­ers. You know–hardware, soft­ware, under­wear. Well, who knows if com­put­ers have undies but per­haps you get the point.

Every year or so some tech com­pany comes up with an improved ver­sion of this or that. Look at Microsoft. You got your Win­dows, Win­dows 2000, Win­dows XP, Win­dows Vista, Win­dows to the World, Dirty Win­dows and Closed Windows.

But some­thing as sim­ple as Yahoo Mail. It’s been the same for thou­sands of years in Inter­net time. Now they are get­ting around to improv­ing it, to change it. And wouldn’t you know that change has to take place at pre­cisely the time you most need that lit­tle piece of tech­no­log­i­cal wiz­ardry to flaw­lessly per­form the mis­sion that it has done so well for so long? The prob­lem is that you have to take time now to learn, or retrain, as to how it functions.

Maybe some­one will come up with a bet­ter ver­sion of time. That’s it: Time 2.0. It sounds down­right techie.

Rangers to the rescue. What a riot!

When one makes a rough-and-tumble, shoot-em-up about Texas it would seem that some­where into the pic­ture would ride the Texas Rangers. That is even if it is only “Walker, Texas Ranger,” as played by Chuck Norris.

220px-Chuck_Norris But while the sto­ried law enforce­ment unit — more accu­rately the inves­tiga­tive arm of the Texas Depart­ment of Pub­lic Safety — might make for a good movie some won­der how well they will fare against ban­di­tos who don’t even pass their way?

Cer­tain local offi­cials from the Mex­i­can bor­der areas of Texas are won­der­ing the same thing. More pre­cisely they are ask­ing some­thing akin to WTF?

goodhair Gov. Rick “No One Has Hair As Pretty As Mine” Perry has ordered a spe­cial task force of Texas Rangers to the Texas-Mexico bor­der. The gov­er­nor has also asked Pres­i­dent Obama for more National Guard sol­diers — funny thing since Perry seemed to be push­ing for Texas seces­sion awhile back at Tea Par­ties — to com­bat Mex­i­can drug car­tel vio­lence. Then, there was that thing about Perry not accept­ing fed­eral stim­u­lus money for the state awhile back.

Lead­ers of some local gov­ern­ment enti­ties along the bor­der say, how­ever, that the drug vio­lence or other crim­i­nal activ­ity from Mex­ico is not spilling over into Texas.

That Perry is seek­ing another term as gov­er­nor and faces a vicious GOP pri­mary bat­tle with U.S. Sen. Kay Bai­ley Hutchi­son surely wouldn’t be cause for send­ing the Rangers to the bor­der. Maybe he ought to send Chuck along for the extra man­power. That is, if seces­sion­ist Chuck­les doesn’t end up run­ning for gov­er­nor (or pres­i­dent) of Texas.

Dancing With the Czars

A lit­tle Fri­day after­noon humor with our national Nut Czar — Glenn Beck — cour­tesy of the Dems.

A new hero

Yes, I have been play­ing around with a new Word­Press theme this after­noon. It is much eas­ier than the one I have used for awhile. We shall see how it goes.

Pres­i­dent Obama made his first Medal of Honor pre­sen­ta­tion today. It was to the fam­ily of Army Sgt. 1st Class Jared Monti. He died in June 2006 after heroic action in Afghanistan.

The Army has improved its Web site that hosts the infor­ma­tion on all of the almost 3,500 ser­vice mem­bers (from all ser­vices, not just the Army) who have received this honor in the wars of our coun­try. I read, includ­ing view­ing a mul­ti­me­dia pre­sen­ta­tion on Sgt. 1st Class Monti, through some of the cita­tions this morn­ing, espe­cially of a few whose name rang a bell for me. For example:

PFC Harold C. Ager­holm, USMCR, who was killed in action July 7, 1944 on Saipan. Under a heavy Japan­ese attack, Ager­holm single-handedly evac­u­ated about 45 casu­al­ties over a three-hour period. He was killed try­ing to reach two more casu­al­ties he believed were Marines. The U.S. Navy destroyer on which I served from 1977–78 in the Pacific was named after Ager­holm. The ship was sunk in a mis­sile test off the South­ern Cal­i­for­nia coast sev­eral years after its decom­mis­sion­ing in 1978.

Army Staff Sgt. Lucian Adams killed nine Ger­man sol­diers and knocked out three enemy machine guns dur­ing a fierce attack on Oct. 28, 1944, near St. Die, France. Adams helped elim­i­nate hos­tile forces and reopened sup­ply lines for his unit. Adams grew up in a large His­panic fam­ily in Port Arthur, Texas. He died in 1983 after retir­ing from the Depart­ment of Vet­er­ans Affairs. Most every time I drive to Port Arthur on U.S. Hwy. 69/96/287 I pass by the road named for Staff Sgt. Lucian Adams, which just this year became home to the newly opened Port Arthur Memo­r­ial High School.

There are many more sto­ries of those who were awarded the Medal of Honor. Some of those sto­ries you may rec­og­nize and oth­ers you won’t. But one will find in those cita­tions some true tales of inspi­ra­tion. We may wish that we didn’t have to fight wars, but we need be glad we have those like Adams and Ager­holm who have what­ever that spark of courage is that makes them do what they do.