Dutch Christmas got the beat(ing): A Holiday classic

 Tonight millions of little boys and girls will be nestled all snug in their beds as visions of sugar plums dance in their heads. Or else, they will be in bed playing some hideously violent video games, perhaps in between, thinking of the gore which the game they will find tomorrow morning under the Christmas tree contains.

 Perhaps parents in “more traditional” homes will read their kids “The Night Before Christmas,” a rather quaint yet enduring poem about a visit from St. Nick originally published in the early 19th century. Certainly the children having “sugar plums” dancing through their head is a quite obsolete reference these days, unless the kids happen to be ripped on some kind of illicit drug.

 Great literary works usually are rewarded with a parody sometime along the line. As for our “Night Before Christmas” one might see variations such as this, for Pennsylvania deer hunters, “The PA Deer Hunter’s Night Before Christmas.”

  “… I looked out the window across the moonlite snow with glee,
  HOLY COW, there was 8 big buck standing underneath the tree.
  I grabbed the 30-06 and started the sneak,
  because I knew the game wardens were all asleep … “

 And in the southeast corner of Texas, adjacent to southern Louisiana, where I live and itself home to a large Cajun population is the “The Cajun Night Before Christmas” complete with a fractured-English-Cajun dialect:

    ” … Then up through the bayou
           Dey got such a clatter
           Make soun’ like old Boudreau
           Done fall off his ladder … “

Christmas stories are just as large a part of the holiday itself. Take for instance, the story of the Baby Jesus, de t’ing what got it started all. And over the years I have kept a keen eye out for a good Christmas story only to come up empty. That is, until reading a story by a witty writer named David Sedaris. Sedaris was raised in North Carolina, is gay and now resides in France. Not that there’s anything wrong with that. He has written a number of books which are compilations of mostly autobiographical-to-auto-fiction-graphical essays, many of which tales either involve his travels or life with a rather unusual family that includes his sister, comedian Amy Sedaris.

 I first read the Christmas story to which I refer in the Dec. 1, 2002, edition of Esquire. The piece is called “Six to Eight Black Men.” It is a tale of Sedaris trying to understand the subtleties of the Dutch version of Santa Claus, who was traditionally accompanied by “six to eight black men.” These black men were originally slaves but modern sensibilities transformed them in more recent times to “just good friends,” albeit with nothing in between. It was teased in Esquire thusly:

    ‘A heartwarming tale of Christmas in a foreign land where, if you’ve been naughty, SAINT NICK and his friends give you an ass-whuppin.’

 So settle back for a glimpse into another country’s version of Santa, have a few chuckles and be glad you’re an American where you might just find yourself in the deep woods staring at a blind deer hunter.

 Click here to read: “Six or Eight Black Men,” by David Sedaris

  Have a Merry Christmas.

Den Mama in de fireplace, Done roas’ up de ham  Stir up de gumbo, An’ make bake de yam. 

  Den out on de by-you, Dey got such a clatta, Make soun’ like ole Boudreau, Done fall off his ladder. 

Happy Festivus to the rest of us!

Today is the day we — EFD — celebrate Festivus.

Here is a very short synopsis about Festivus and more can be read in this pretty good Wikipedia article:

Festivus is a made-up holiday introduced to the world on Dec. 18, 1997 on the incredible late 20th century sitcom “Seinfeld.” The holiday is just one more gift to society given by the genius comedian Jerry Seinfeld and his writers. A line of such cultural gifts from Seinfeld and cast exists, like “close talker,” “regifting” and “Not that there’s anything wrong with that.” The date on which it is celebrated was portrayed on the show as Dec. 23. The premises of Festivus, as explained by character Frank Costanza — father of one of the main characters George Costanza — was a reaction to the hyper-commercialization of Christmas.

The major symbol for the holiday is an aluminum pole. Traditional practices include “Feats of Strengths” and the “Airing of Grievances,” in which each person tells the others present how they disappointed him or her that year.

Probably no one knows, but Festivus is actually celebrated by people in reality. There are three Festivus Facebook groups with more than 15,000 fans. Just what those numbers mean, I couldn’t begin to tell you.

Since this is a holiday that really lacks any rigidity it is a perfect one for me to celebrate. I don’t even have an aluminum pole this Festivus, but I might go out and find one. Although you can buy a Festivus pole online, I think it kind of defeats the purpose of thumbing one’s nose to commercialism. No offense Festivuspole.com.

Festivus-Pole-from-Seinfeld

People throw stuff away left and right, including aluminum poles. That is especially true in places where hurricanes seem to strike every third week and folks are continually rebuilding their homes when they aren’t fighting the insurance companies in court.

And for those of you who read my blog, or even worse, know me personally, you know that I have no shortages of grievances to air. No one says the grievances one airs must necessarily be pointed toward friends or family. So here are just a few of my grievances for this year:

People who park their huge-a** trucks or SUVs across more than one parking space. Do these people think that because they have a large automobile it entitles them to park however they desire? Or are they just stupid? Especially during the holiday season when parking spaces at malls or other shopping areas are crucial, one should grasp the idea that parking spaces are there for a reason. A space isn’t there to make you conform to society’s rules. It is there to ensure everyone who can grab a space has a place to park. That is so these potential customers can buy things and the shopkeepers or large corporations can get filthy rich! Oh no, this rant has just gone South Pole with my musings returning to commercialism. I have just run myself into a literary circle of no return.

Well, that’s it. I have other grievances but instead of airing a few I just hit a dead end thanks to commerce. Screw it. It’s time to enjoy the holiday before the holiday (before the holiday if you celebrate Boxing Day on Dec. 26.)

Oh I forgot the Feats of Strength. I think I will pass on that this year.

Have a great Festivus and you know what you can do with the pole.

Obama and his minions controlling that "health care thing"

Last night two of my brothers and I had a brief conversation on Facebook concerning what some see as backroom deals made in the Senate to pass the health care reform bill. Well, it really wasn’t a conversation, we just posted our opinions.

My brothers, like the majority of my friends, have differing opinions from those of mine. It’s no biggie. It’s the price for growing up and continuing to live in Texas during this day and age.

Compromise and going all out to secure it looms large at the very essence of our political system today. We like keeping our local military base open (I’m just being rhetorical here) or we are happy when our local police and fire department get federal grants. But sometimes those goodies come come to Papa smelling all the world like bacon, ham and spare ribs. Umm, umm, umm. You love you some pork.

Federal largesse and its distribution to the voting public is actually much more complex than that and because I am tired, I will leave the subject to another day to discuss. So why did I devote three paragraphs to the above? It seemed like the right thing to do at the time.

Instead, I am going to spend a minute or two on the subject of President Barack Obama and his role in eventually passing a health care reform package.

Now this reform bill is something Obama wants very much or you wouldn’t be seeing members of Congress hanging around a snow-bound Washington three days before Christmas. But there are those who see Obama providing very little leadership in this extraordinary legislative battle. Some even say that it seems the President is just sitting back and letting Congress fight out among themselves.

Until the Washington press corps gets off their duffs (what is a duff anyway?) and start reporting instead of being stenographers, or else, until Bob Woodward or someone else on the inside of the Beltway elite writes a book about it, we won’t know whether Obama fiddled around while Capitol Hill (figuratively) burned.

So, indulge me in a scenario of the question regarding presidential leadership of the health care issue, his number one priority:

Off we go:

Obama and his minions are plugged in with tin cans and a long-ass string that runs down Pennsylvania Avenue from the White House to the Capitol, or however they stay in touch, calling every shot. Some Senators don’t like being told what to do, like Righteous Joe Lieberman. Therefore, Obama being the coach sends in another play.

Eventually, the bill gets passed. It is 2010. Congressional races everywhere. The opposition no longer has health reform as the dead horse on which to beat. And, by summertime the economy has drastically improved. Sure, unemployment is still  higher than we would like, but that situation too is turning around.

Only the true believers of the Tea Party still harp on health reform, socialism, taxation, gayness and other evils of the Democrats. It could prove to be the undoing of the Republican party though  if some responsible leadership does not arise from the GOP in the nick of time.

Come November, the schism in the Republican party rears its ugly head as independent congressional candidates and the GOP nominees split the vote, resulting in a huge win for the Democratic congressional candidates.

And guess what? A good many of those candidates were vetted by the Obama machine. When they take their seats in Congress in 2011, unreliable Democrats like Ben Nelson or Republican In Name Onlies like Susan Collins or Independent flakes like Lieberman will no longer be needed for a super majority vote.

As this plays out, we see some of the failed measures which almost split the extreme liberal wing from the Democratic party over the health care compromises return. For Republicans, the dreaded “Public Option” once again rears its head. And the next thing you know, Obama is on  his way to a  second term.

Now granted, all of the above sounds like a terrific tale. When I say terrific I mean way out there, although I think it might be terrific in other ways. It’s just a guess though. It’s just picking up a dart and throwing it at the wall when there is no dart board in sight.

But it could happen. And if it happens, then don’t say I didn’t warn you. Then I’ll start on predicting the next Super Bowl winners followed by those in the World Series. Or whichever comes first.

Excuse me Mr. Kelly, you seem to have lost your pants

Tommy Kelly lost his pants.

Such is a lede (lead) that could launch practically any classic tale of the vulnerability or humility of man. But here it is, likely for the Oakland Raiders defensive tackle, a source of embarrassment that will follow him for some time if not ensure him a place in his own locker room’s best jokes.

If you didn’t hear or see the clip on the Web, Kelly’s pants somehow fell off while playing in front of a CBS television audience and only 67,000 some-odd live people at Denver’s Invesco Field at Mile High Sunday. At least the Raiders picked up a win, putting them at a grim 4-9-0 for the season.

No matter how disconcerting the incident in which Kelly was em-bare-assed it is likely that only fools, drunks and drunken fools who aren’t football players will bring up the matter if they run across the Raider in person one day. At 6-feet, 6 inches tall and 300 pounds, yeah, only his fellow pros might make him the butt of their jokes and then likely only those around his height and girth. Certainly few place kickers will deride him.

But all kidding aside, it was an interesting and entertaining week in pro football. And sad.

The weekend games carried the shadow of Cincinnati wide receiver Chris Henry’s death on Thursday. Henry fell out of a pickup truck bed during a domestic dispute. Such things shouldn’t happen during one of the Bengals’ most promising seasons after years of rare winning seasons. But they do and they did.

However, the games go on and are bigger than just one man. That is, unless you are Brett Favre. When his head coach wanted to bench the star Vikings quarterback, the Methuselah From Mississippi just wouldn’t go.

Then, no matter how much the loud and the not-so-loud Saints fans were disappointed, their undefeated streak finally came to end with their loss to the Dallas Cowboys. Oh well, as I (a Saints fan) told an acquaintance watching the game, it’s not the Super Bowl.

As for my main team, the Texans, well, they managed to climb their way out of the hole with a three-point win over St. Louis. There is hope for a wild card berth if they can win their last two games and a hole opens up and swallows half the AFC who knows what other teams have to win and which have to lose.

So why write about the NFL on Monday when I could write about the Senate passing their version of the health care bill and the climate change talks in Copenhagen? Are you nuts? It’s the NFL in December!

Good work if you can keep it

 The non-profit news site Texas Tribune apparently has unleashed a data-based investigation that has a lot of jaws flapping in the Lone Star State.

 Headed by former Texas Monthly editor-in-everything, New Yorker Evan Smith, the Tribune has an easy-to-use data grabber on which you can find the salaries of your local school superintendent or any in the rest of Texas. Hats off to the Tribune’s Matt Stiles and Brian Thevenot for an enlightening report.

 The information unleashed especially has many a neck reddening down here in Beaumont where it is little or no surprise that our sometimes controversial Beaumont ISD Superintendent Dr. Carroll Thomas is the state’s highest paid school executive.

 Thomas makes a very comfortable $324,212 per year. I would say what is most interesting about his salary is that it is earned for overseeing a district with 13,309 students.  The top four highest-paid supes following Thomas all have salaries in the 300 grand range. They oversee Fort Worth ISD (79,285 enrollment), Dallas ISD (157,352), Alief (45,230), and Houston (200,225 students).

 It seems much is made from other media using the Tribune’s information of “per-student” figures, the amount of dollars in salary per student, of each school leader. Maybe I am missing it, but I have yet to find much real significance in those figures other than in the “Gee Whiz” factor. The fact is a number of schools with smaller enrollments sometimes pay fairly handsome salaries to superintendents which would tend to skew the per-student number. Superintendent Fernando Castillo runs the Progreso ISD in the Rio Grande Valley’s Hidalgo County. The district has an enrollment of  2, 150 and Fernando draws a salary of $208,566. Thus, Castillo has a $97-per student figure while Daniel King who is superintendent of Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD in the same county “earns” $7 per student with his enrollment of 30,618.

 A total of 214 superintendents who run schools ranging from 500-2,500 students are paid salaries ranging from the high $99,000s to more than $46,000. Those are actually some of the lower paid supes in the state.

 While some of the salaries seem out of whack, especially when looking at enrollment, they also have to be seen in context. Texas has what I consider to be an inequitable school academic grading system. On the other hand, there are a lot of things I would do different if I was the King of Texas.

 Socioeconomics also have to be figured into a rating a school in the state’s “accountability system.” Thus, a superintendent’s ability in ensuring that a school has a tolerable rating many times has to be seen through the lens of the racial and economic make up of a district’s students. For instance, Beaumont’s Thomas heads a school with a majority minority population that has improved its grade from “Academically Acceptable” to “Recognized.” The latter is the second highest of six accountability ratings the state pulled out of its a** uses.

 Of course, Thomas has detractors who accuse him of everything from cronyism to worse.

 I should be more involved and aware of our local school system. But I have no kids in school. I am more worried about the federal government, city government and state government, in that order. So I will leave it to those who support Thomas, racists who hate him because he is black, or those who have anywhere from a modicum of sense to brilliance who do not think Thomas is doing a good job but aren’t likely to lynch him.

 This I will say. There are a whole group of professions with people who make very tidy sums of money because they have difficult jobs that are very often looked at by the public with a keen eye and scrutinized by an elected board of officials of whom  every decision is a political one. This group include school superintendents, high school football coaches (I suspect some in Texas make more money than superintendents), city managers and police and fire chiefs in urban areas.

 Is Carroll Thomas worth the sum of money he is paid and which makes him the highest paid school chief in Texas? I don’t know. I think, honestly, the only way to say is to look at his record once he is replaced. But I know I wouldn’t want his job. I wouldn’t want the job of Beaumont West Brook head coach Craig Stump. Nor would I want the jobs of the Beaumont fire chief Anne Huff and police chief Frank Coffin. I wouldn’t mind if Beaumont’s city manager got a better-paying job elsewhere. But that’s another story for another time.