Kidnapped Navy goat found safe and sound: Soldiers suspected in goat rustling

A Maryland kidnapping had a happy ending despite a crime that was more than enough to get anyone’s goat.

Bill the Goat 43 or 44? That is among those unanswered questions in goat-rustling. U.S. Defense Department photo

Bill the Goat, the Navy Academy mascot, was taken over the weekend from Maryland Sunrise Farms. The farm, which provided milk for more than 80 years to midshipmen as the Naval Academy Dairy Farm, is home to the two Navy Goats Bill XXXIII and XXXIV. The farm manager told Navy Times that it was not known which of the two mascots were kidnapped but he suspected soldiers stole the goat. The Angora was found safe and sound tied up on a median near the Pentagon in Arlington, Va.

Let’s see a military goat was kidnapped and taken across state lines. That sounds serious. But strict punishment for any perpetrator who might be caught is doubtful. Stealing the Navy goat is a tradition leading up to the annual Army-Navy game. That contest will take place 3 p.m., December 8 at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia.

The Navy Department said they didn’t know who took one of the Bills but suspect it could have something to do with the upcoming game.

Although the goat was unharmed the farm manager was none too pleased it was left tied up on a busy highway median and suggests that it might be time the goat-rustling tradition ends. West Point official said they had no knowledge of the Bill heist and said that both academies have pledged not to steal each others’ mascots.Then again, who would want to steal the U.S. Military Academy’s mascot, a mule, unless they were planning to go plow the back 40?

The future of pictures? Film is not likely.

A sort of lengthy, tech-heavy story about the financial trials and tribulations faced in recent years by Kodak caught my eye in Sunday’s The Washington Post. The article goes on, as promised by the headline, to examine lessons that the struggling photo equipment company could learn from its old nemesis Polaroid.

What I found most interesting was the forecast on Page 3 of the piece that within several years the camera market will only be those in the high-dollar range or else those which are extremely cheap. Part of the reason for the prediction of under-$200 point-and-shoot cameras fading to the past is that many of the smartphones already feature better cameras. The story pointed out that the iPhone4, such as the one I recently purchased has “an electronic flash and high-dynamic-range capability, both technologies that would’ve seemed impossible to stuff into a phone a decade ago.”

From my limited knowledge of and experience with digital cameras over the past decade I now wonder if it was a huge waste of time to take basic photography in college. It was required with my journalism degree or I probably wouldn’t have signed up for the course. However, the semester in which I had the course was the most horrid in all my four years as I learned the hard way not to take 19 semester hours. This all came with labs in photography, naturally, plus a geological history lab and a lab in picture editing and layout. I did get to take pictures with a big ol’ box as well as develop and enlarge them. But I never did any photo lab work in the nearly 30 years since.

Luckily, I never had to do photo lab work at the newspapers where I also had to do some of my own shooting. And working with some pretty talented shooters who had started in film and segued into digital, I learned that I really like taking pictures.

But money has always been a limiting factor in photography whether it be a desire to go out and buy the crème de la crème of the photo world or just something with which to take vacation photos. Still I have a point and shoot that I have taken decent stills and videos with and in just playing around with my iPhone, so far, it seems that the phone does take much better videos than does my Fuji. And yet, I am not a rich man.

I guess we will just have to see what happens with the future of the camera. I would have never thought my phone would take decent pictures and videos, so I figure we might just be ahead to the game when it comes to cameras that exist only as cameras.

 

Nitwit East Texas congressman thinks someone cares about his opinion

Once upon a time I lived in what is now the U.S. House of Representatives district held by one Louie Gohmert. Now I can’t claim to be substantially represented by our current but outgoing Republican Congressman Ted Poe. Both Gohmert and Poe are publicity-seeking demagogues whose beds rest in the nuttiest of the nut-wing portion of the GOP. Of the two politicians, Poe is maybe the least abrasive, somewhat tempered perhaps by his years serving as a Houston district judge. Poe was moved to another district through Texas legislative redistricting. Our current district which includes the upper Texas Coast will be held by another Republican, Randy Weber, who will take a redrawn district formerly held by Ron Paul.

Weber had served in the Texas House prior to beating former Democrat U.S. Rep. Nick Lampson in this month’s General Election. Other than Weber being a Republican state lawmaker and winning over a choice I had favored for Congress, I have no knowledge about our new congressman. I have no reason for high hopes with Weber though because it seems every Texas Republican who has been elected to Congress within the last 20 years has been a dud.

This brings me back to Gohmert.The “good” Congressman gained quite a bit of notoriety during the last couple of years because of his spouting ridiculous ideas such as ones that so-called “terror babies” posed a threat to our national security. This stupidity which was a variation on the theme of “anchor babies” — babies born to illegal immigrants and brought to the U.S. to secure legal immigration — but were supposedly babies whose terrorist parents sought a foothold in the country due to the legalities of the 14th Amendment.

The terror baby theory is just one among the rampant absurdities Gohmert has spewed in the national media. Other comments included his opinion that the mass shootings at an Aurora, Colo., movie theater in July 2012 was due to the nation’s lack of Judeo-Christian values and the lack of concealed handguns.

Now, on this very day, a Huffington Post article says Gohmert blasted House leaders for not taking the lead in the “fiscal cliff” debate. The Texas congressman foresees most of the rich Americans moving out of the U.S. if all of the Bush tax cuts are not extended. Why anyone would pay heed to Gohmert, a monumental waste of U.S. congressional space, is beyond me.

These are the type of ignorant rednecks we have representing Texas in Congress. There is no proof to anything that Gohmert says about the tax or any other subject. Perhaps he means that he will leave the U.S. if these tax cuts are not maintained. That would perhaps be the first positive accomplished by Gohmert and his cohorts in their years of government service.

Top 10 bills to follow in the 2013 Texas Lege reduced by 7

Austin television station KXAN has an interesting Top 10 list of proposed bills to follow in the 2013 Texas legislative session. Some are downright playing-to-the-right-wing-base ignorant. Here are my top five from that list:

1. Drug testing for welfare — There will be no epidemic of poor folks using drugs by the time this bill, filed by GOP Sen. Jane Nelson of Flower Mound, passes than there is now. It’s a “feel-good” elixir for the right wing. It’s demagoguery plain and simple.

2. Ten Commandments in Class — Republican Rep. Dan Flynn of Van wants copies of the Ten Commandments placed in “prominent” places in the classroom. I’ve got nothing against the Ten Commandments, but they violate laws separating church and state. This will wind up in court(s) and cost the taxpayers untold dollars while losing the case.

3. TSA Anti-groping — It could only be a guess but I bet when the Twin Towers et. al. came down on 9/11 probably some of those hollering the loudest for the federal government to stop such a thing from happening were some of our friends on the right. And on the left. We have security now in airports and many think they are too important to be inconvenienced by precautions which often leads to them getting groped in the first place. Yes, it might be random. So what? You don’t have to fly. GOP Rep. David Simpson of Longview tried to pass this last session and Gov. Good Hair had it brought up in Special Session. Jeez, prohibit TSA groping? Can we also prohibit Fox News?

Well, I only got to three that were out-of-the-Solar-System-Stupid. That doesn’t mean the remainder are all winners, or losers for that matter.

–Open Carry — Republican Rep. George Lavender of Texarkana may file a bill similar to one he pushed last time which would allow those holding licenses to carry a concealed handgun to optionally carry the weapon in the open. I’ve often thought that this made more sense than allowing concealed carry only. At least if someone is openly carrying a gun one can see it and do all that is possible to either ignore that person or make sure that you have something twice that person’s firepower. No seriously, I don’t know but the proposal seems to have some good points as well as bad ones. I know a lot of folks who would like guns outlawed. I can see how that would be a good thing in a different world. We are unfortunately stuck with the world we have.

— Texting while driving. The GOP former House Speaker Tom Craddick of Midland is pushing this bill, which Good Hair vetoed, again. It needs to be not only passed, but signed by our idiot governor.

–Tuition freeze. Dan Branch, the Republican House member from Dallas wants college tuition in state institutions frozen for students for four years from the time they enter school. UT Austin currently freezes tuition for two years. This is to encourage finishing in four years. I think this is a good idea, perhaps with a fifth year available in emergency situations.

–SJR 6 — Casino and slot gambling. Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, and others want a constitutional amendment to let voters decide whether a small number of casinos should be allowed in Texas. Limited numbers of slot and video gambling machines at horse tracks would be allowed as would gambling at the state’s Indian reservations. I have no moral reservations about this, pardon the pun. I wonder if it can pass what with surrounding states and the large gambling interests behind those states.

–The rest — I have no opinion on the other bills listed. You can read them your own-self.

 

 

 

 

All in the family: It’s good to have a famous name in media

Our celebrity-crazed culture already brings millions upon millions of dollars for being able to play ball or run really fast or even swim really fast. I have no real problem with that. The majority of athletes who rise to the top and get the megabucks generally devote their lives, their souls and even their bodies to their sport. There are entertainers who are, at least in the minds of some, terrific at their art who also may be paid very handsome sums for acting or performing music. It can be a bit murky in many cases as to whether certain movie or small screen stars or recording artists are really worth what they are paid.

Some folks get paid for their name and their name alone, although those who hire them always seem to find some virtue that is worth fortune and acclaim. It is at this point where paying celebs because they are celebs makes me more than uncomfortable.

For years now celebrities’ names have begun showing up on the “best-seller” lists for various books, mostly in the non-fiction genre. There were tell-alls, or some essays concerning the certain passions of the rich and famous, even celebrity fitness and cookbooks. Maybe some of these celebrity-penned works were purchased by publishers for the “authors” writing abilities. More than often that wasn’t the case. The celebrity book, many times these days, are not even written by your famous celebrity. It might be the book was written by your favorite “celebrity ghost writer.” The latter — folks like Mickey Herskowitz come to mind — may have started out the hard way and were later picked by publishers to put a celebrity’s voice into words.

Perhaps it was only a matter of time that jobs — especially those in media — were handed out to famous people or even the kids of the famous. There was understandable grousing when Luke Russert began working for NBC News on TV journalist spots not long after his Dad, the fabulous Tim Russert, died suddenly. Russert, now 27, began working on special spots such as covering youth issues during the 2008 elections. He now pops up everywhere including as a fill-in anchor on shows such as MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports.”

Just maybe young Russert inherited some of his late Dad’s broadcasting chops. Luke did study broadcasting at Boston College and worked as an intern for various networks. He also seems to be a pretty good TV newsman himself though what I have seen him do is fairly limited and of the stuff your better local news reporters do daily. Notice I say, better, not the best.

Now Southern Living, the long-time lifestyle magazine has announced former “First Daughter” Jenna Bush-Hager will be editor-at-large. Bush-Hager is a contributing correspondent on NBC’s “The Today Show.” I have never caught her Today reports. I do remember the then-Jenna Bush sticking her tongue out at a media contingent in which I was included one day at Fort Hood.  That’s was, what, eight years ago when she was still in college? Oh well, she was just young and having fun back then. But heavy on the “eight years ago.”

Bush-Hager will write a Q and A with well-known Southerners and a blog on daily Southern life. I suppose some magazine jobs sound much more gravitas-filled than others. What, if any, other responsibilities she will have I don’t know. I know that as with as many magazine positions I have applied for and received nary a thank-you, one of those had to be “Southern Living.”

Of course, hiring celebrity kids — presidential ones even — is nothing new. Steven Ford starred in a soap opera and has acted for years in the movies. All of the Reagan kids have been in some sort of media gig. After all, it’s really the family business. Chelsea Clinton has had a difficult time treading the line between work as a special correspondent for NBC News and campaigning for various issues

Just maybe there is another motive behind hiring the young celebs. Perhaps these young people will not demand more money, kind of like the ones who now occupy the jobs in media these days. The older guys get the pink slip and the young kids fill the dinosaur’s spot at a reduced salary. I have to think the celeb kid being hired might just make a wee bit, maybe even a good bit, more than the fresh-faced younger person with no famous name.

It’s good to know someone famous. It’s a hell of a lot better to be someone with a famous name.