Afghanistan and the eye of the Tiger, oh my

 Today I have a few words — figuratively speaking — on subjects of which I could discuss with thousands of words. However, I don’t want that and if you read this blog, you surely don’t want that.

 First off, Afghanistan and the upshot of President Obama ordering 30,000 additional troops into whatever it is we are fighting over there.

 Flip a coin. Heads, you approve of the additional troops. Tails, you disapprove. That is how I look at the announcement of additional forces. I initially thought we should have gone into Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks. Today, I’m not so sure. The only thing I am sure of is that we shouldn’t have invaded Iraq. That war is what one might call unjust, not to mention illegal. I haven’t heard it called “Bush’s Folly” or “Shrub’s Folly,” but it should go down in history that way.

 If the search and destroy mission for Osama bin Laden and gang should  not have been a federal criminal investigation — with help from the military and CIA — many of the troops and material poured into Iraq (not to mention the billions of dollars) could have went to Afghanistan.

 I guess the American in me believes that we should find some kind of victory both in Iraq and Afghanistan and leave. We need to figure out what it is we are there to do because I am not sure what our goals are now in those countries.

 As for Obama sending more trooops to augment the more than 70,000 already there — and the allies sending 5,000 more to help the almost 40,000 NATO and other foreign forces in Afghanistan — I say: “Let’s see if it works out.” He has offered a timetable, albeit a seemingly short one.  So if the situation doesn’t improve by whenever it is Obama wants a withdrawal to begin, then we get mad and jump up and down and say: “Bad Obama. Bad, bad Obama.” This seems as good as anything else I can imagine.

********************************************************

 Next subject. Le Tigre. El Tigre.  Ang Tigre. The Tiger.

 Tiger, Tiger, Tiger.

 Why is the mainstream media doing stories on what was, initially, a rather odd car crash involving Tiger Woods?  Do viewers and readers of the media have such uninteresting lives that they MUST know the details of all the indiscretions of this sports (sports?) star? I have the most uninteresting life  imaginable, at least at the moment, and I don’t care about Tiger Woods” intimate moments. Let me be a bit more specific. I DON’T GIVE A RAT’S RECTUM ABOUT THE TIGER WOODS SCANDAL.

 Tiger Woods has not been elected to greatest golfer in the world or highest-paid sports star in the world. We do not own Tiger Woods. He has no obligation to tell the public zip. Sure, every star of every kind blames the media when things start to go South. But if anyone has a case against the media, this time it is Tiger Woods.

 It makes me both angry and sad to see great newspaper and broadcasting outlets report the latest on this scandal. Why don’t they report something really earth-shaking, like this?

Take your best job and shove it!

 Would you consider your job the best around?

 Even though I very much like what I am doing, my job, or jobs actually, are nowhere near one of those considered the best in the country, according to CNNMoney.com. The online business magazine has listed what it considers the 100 best jobs in the country based upon salary, quality of life and job growth.

 I did a quick inventory of all the full-time and part-time jobs I have had since leaving high school 35 years ago. Compared with many who are perhaps 10 years or so older than I am, I imagine I look like a prize-winning job hopper.

 People used to have jobs and stay with them until they retire. These days, not so much. One major reason for job hopping today is because the company wants you to go so that they may restructure or self-destruct or whatever. Still, I have had six full-time jobs if you count the Navy, and my four newspaper jobs along with my current (struggling) career as a freelance writer as one job. I have also had four part-time jobs including my present one working for the government.

 Not one of the jobs I have or in which I have ever been employed are listed on that top 100 list. Here is a quick run-down of what I’ve done:

    Assembled boxes in a chicken processing plant. Whee!/Navy administrative/clerical worker/Professional firefighter (worked part-time for awhile moving mobile homes. Eeeeeh. and also had a part-time EMT job)/Regional EMS planner/Apartment maintenance worker/Vacuumer at car wash/part-time editor of monthly music magazine/Worked three part-time jobs — short-order cook, bartender and secret shopper (Dairy Queen detective)/Mental health worker/Journalist (editor, reporter, freelance writer)/part-time government job.

 It really looks worse than it is. Actually, when considering percentages, 82% of 35 years working have been with three jobs, providing you count the different stops I had as a journalist as one, and I do. But none of my jobs, as I said, were on the top 100 CNNMoney list. Well, it doesn’t matter. None of the jobs I held were what you call “money makers.” But I have spent 57% of my adult working life as a journalist, which is what I wanted to “be when I grew up.” Oh well, I got what I wanted to be while not necessarily growing up. So be it. And the two worst jobs: moving mobile homes and assembling boxes in a chicken plant. It takes a special breed for those jobs and I suppose I am a breed apart.

 I have said in numerous job interviews, and it is only partially blowing smoke up the interviewer’s ass, that while some might look negatively on my having worked so many jobs I feel that every experience I ever had helped me do the next job better.

 Speaking of longevity, I read in Elise Hu’s blog on Texas Tribune that long-long-time Associated Press photographer Harry Cabluck was one of those unfortunate few who were laid off yesterday during that wire service’s personnel purge.

 Hu notes that Harry, 71, was in the motorcade when JFK was shot in Dallas. He has been based in Austin for many years. A ton of tributes are being collected in Hu’s blog for Harry.

 I don’t know Harry well. I only was in his space twice. Once we talked for a few minutes on the floor of the Texas House of Representatives while waiting on something or the other. The other time was quite a bit longer.

 Harry and I were among press covering something at Fort Hood. He had left his car at the southern end of the post and we were up at the northern extreme. I gave him a lift and was entertained by Harry along the way. What I remember the most was his talking about some cohort or acquaintance of his — that and it was about a 20-minute drive and I really needed to use the bathroom. Harry said either the cohort or both of them used to spend time making up stories about people they would see — total strangers — while they were driving along. Harry gave some really funny examples while we were driving and, well, you had to have been there. I’m sure Harry doesn’t remember that although I understand he has a pretty good memory. I, however, do not.

 Best of luck to Harry Cabluck in his future.

Suit seeks anonymous commentator

 It isn’t often that I am encouraged by a defamation lawsuit. You see, I am pretty big into free speech, if you haven’t noticed. I also was once sued for defamation. It wasn’t pretty and the allegation wasn’t true. A federal judge booted the case out on its res gestae where it belonged.

 But the legal action I am talking about is one that could help erase the scourge that cheapens modern mass communication and raises the nation’s stupidity quotient. That would be hateful and libellous open comments on articles published on the Internet that are written by anonymous correspondents.

 The case involves a Kentucky attorney who is suing Kentucky.com, owned by the Lexington-Herald Leader. A person using a screen name allegedly made defamatory comments against this attorney. The lawyer is defending a man charged with murder and violating a domestic violence order. The attorney says she just wants the real name of the person who made the comments so that she may take further legal action. She is, however, seeking unspecified damages plus those for pain and suffering.

 The editor of the paper said the person making the comments was banned from the site and that the comments were removed. The paper is contacting that person to see if they want to invoke their rights to anonymous free speech.

 Lest you think I may show some hypocrisy here supporting other forms of free speech but not anonymous free speech, rest assured that I am not. But there are defamation laws and libel laws. That I know for sure and even though I may not like those laws when they are misused against me to dig into deeper pockets, I feel those statutes are there for long-held principles against bearing false witness against one’s neighbor.

 My agreement with this suit is for much less loftier reasons though. I simply am sick and tired of seeing a bunch of racist, ignorant, idiots dominate these comment boxes, saying what they want about whomever or whatever most often without facts to back them up.

 What is even worse are newspapers and other media platforms that use sites clumsily disguised as not a part of that media outlet which are used to start or build upon controversies employing subtle, but incitable material. See: race baiting.

 Newspapers, especially, should reflect the society that surrounds it. But papers should also mirror the respectfulness and good manners that are at the core of a civilized society.

 I don’t wish for any financial ruin for anyone in the aforementioned lawsuit. I also hope it don’t lead to judicial precedent that would threaten free anonymous speech. Sometimes, that is the only way some people can comment without facing some kind of physical or economic danger. But I do wish such an action could remind those with some sort of a media mouthpiece — be it The New York Times or eight feet deep — that anonymous speech need be responsible speech.

Adios Lou. Don't let the door hit you …

 Probably the best news I have heard from CNN lately is word that supposed “independent” but actually right-wing blowhard Hispanic-hater Lou Dobbs resigned as of last night.

 The network has announced that “State of the Union” host John King will take over the time slot left by Dobbs’ exit. It’s probably the best they can do right now. I like King immensely as a reporter. He has credentials that you don’t often find these days in the cable news biz, mainly that he was the main political  reporter for Associated Press.

 As an interviewer on a Sunday morning show like SOTU, King hasn’t really impressed me. Perhaps something like this hour slot will allow him to focus more solidly on subjects, thus finding something that will really showcase his reporting talents. I sure hope so. CNN needs to do something.

 There are less than a handful of anchors on CNN that I can watch these days. And their prime-time line-up up to now has positively stunk. You had Dobbs, a one-time respectable business reporter turned bigot loudmouth. Then came Campbell Brown, who just annoys the living hell out of me. Larry King, who should have retired to Miami decades ago. And Anderson Cooper. Need I say more?

 So I hope King does well in Dobbs’ time spot. As for Dobbs, I hope he runs for president on an independent ticket. He will be sure to take some of the nut-job votes away from the Republican candidate. (I wonder who he’d pick as his nut-job running mate, “Moose Girl” Sarah Palin or Minnesota Mental Midget U.S. Rep. Michelle Bachmann, R-Idiot Asylum? But first, I’m sure Dobbs will do something to first recharge his batteries, such as going hunting for Mexicans on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Tired? Turn to the obit page.

Three matters bothered me this morning when I traveled to the Houston VA hospital for an EMG, nerve test, on my feet and legs. Nothing that was a bother had anything directly to do with the test.

First I woke at 4:50  a.m. I did so to catch the shuttle van from the local outpatient clinic to the hospital. As it turned out — my being the filling between almost 500 pounds of veteran sandwich in the van ride — my own drive to Houston with morning rush hour traffic and all might have turned out to have been more pleasant had I driven my truck instead. So the hour at which I awoke, the uncomfortable ride to the hospital and dealing with some of the VA’s most accomplished bureaucratic assh**es while trying to work out another matter completely were what made my day much less than perfect.

The EMG itself, performed by a friendly doc with a heavy Latino accent wasn’t really much of a problem at all considering I would get my legs or feet shocked from time-to-time. The shocks weren’t like getting shocked when one grabs hold of a live wire. Believe me. Been there done that — ow, ow s**t!!!

Mostly it was the early morning rise that got to me. Even though I somehow managed to sleep most of the way back from Houston sitting upright in the van, I still feel halfway dead. As such, it is most appropriate that I pay tribute here to a great man whose obituary I noticed today.

Many may not recognize the name Vic Mizzy right off, unless you watched the running gag with the television credits which opened the 1960s TV comedy “Green Acres.”  Mizzy, who died in Los Angeles Saturday at 93, wrote the theme for Eddie Albert-Eva Gabor farce. The Gabor character would make some bizarre comment about the opening credits which would feature Mizzy or other crew’s names, something one would hardly if ever see on any other TV show or movie.

But it was probably another of Mizzy’s TV songs which is more widely known, however, that being the theme of the “Addams Family,” complete with the song’s finger snaps.

True, Mizzy may not have cured cancer or polio, or have won a Nobel Prize (no comment please). But some of his songs help us remember some of the zaniest TV programming that aired during a time that cried out for hilarity, the 1960s. Those themes remain catchy and appealing today.

Snap, snap. Keep Manhattan just give me that countryside …