Troops sounding off


It is a bit subtle perhaps, but more and more can one hear U.S. soldiers speaking out against the war in Iraq. It is becoming fewer and far between that you hear the company line or the upbeat optimism from the grunt on the ground when interviewed by reporters. It’s little wonder when you have men and women less than 25 years old on their third tour of combat. And it isn’t just the grunts who want to go home. The captains and the colonels are expressing their doubts as to whether the Iraqis they have tried to train will ever come together for their own defense. Not to mention a slew of former generals who say this war thing just isn’t working out.

Perhaps a bit startling and perhaps not is this expression of bitterness and frustration from former Army Ranger Kevin Tillman, whose brother (former pro football star turned Ranger) Pat Tillman, was accidentally killed by fellow soldiers in Afghanistan. The Army decided to wait to reveal the facts of the latter Tillman’s death to his parents. But not before concocting a big story of heroism in which they posthumously awarded Pat Tillman with an upper-tier medal.

Do you promise to tell the truth, the whole truth …


Is your past really all that important? That seems like a slam-dunk question from first glance. Why of course it is. You would hopefully think twice (or more) about hiring a convicted pedophile to provide
your kids with daycare. Do you think you might want to hire a convicted embezzler as your accountant? These are all legitimate considerations for ensuring Mr. (or Mrs. or Ms.) Right isn’t all wrong. But just how much of one’s personal history is germane to the job someone might do as an elected official?

Would one’s past as a hemp-loving nudist necessarily preclude them from doing a good job as a state legislator? Does it matter if a candidate for U.S. Senate who may someday be a presidential candidate had “millions” of dollars in cosmetic surgery, or even if that candidate’s opponent supposedly referred to that candidate as “ugly?” The answer is an overwhelming yes, or no, or maybe or perhaps.

In a fair and just world, the actions or words of someone would be taken in context. But context doesn’t always keep your kid safe from Chester the Molester. And, the situation in which one’s words or deeds took place will certainly not prevent political operatives from exploiting an opponent’s negative.

So what to do? Should parents raise their kids in a world void of making all mistakes? Then, when the child grows to adulthood, should that person avoid any type of misunderstanding or questionable judgment or God forbid, fun? Of course not. That leaves only one choice — to “fess up.”

Yes, confession is good for the soul. It’s more than just a Roman Catholic thing. When you apply for that job, when you decide to run for office, sit down and list every bad thing, every questionable event, every errant thought that has ever crossed your mind.

“When I was 5, I took Johnny’s candy when he wasn’t looking.”
“I called Jane “Chicken Legs” in the 5th Grade.”
“I told my mother I was going to the library but really went to the arcade when I was 14.”
“I got so drunk at Chip’s house that I peed on his dog’s leg.”
“I reported to the IRS that I spent $40 on a new chair when I actually only paid $33 for it.”
“I shot a man in Reno, just to watch him die.”

Of course, if you are running for political office then don’t be too surprised if your opponent tries to disprove that you really peed on the leg of Chip’s dog or if the opponent tries in other ways to brand you as a liar by accusing you of really going to to the library even though you confessed to sneaking over to the arcade. In other words, you just can’t win. So f*ck it.

Be careful with your surprise Karl


Karl Rove’s October surprise may be at hand.

A lot of what ifs are circulating about the blogosverse over a potential “October surprise” that Karl Rove may engineer for Republicans during next month’s mid-term elections. The speculation has run the gamut from near-hysterical — nuking Iran or declaring martial law in the U.S. — to the mundane.

If I were a psychic I would tell you what surprise, if any, Rove and friends might pull out of their hat. Of course, if I were a psychic, I would wait for a big lottery jackpot and go buy a ticket.

All I hope is that the GOP and Rove do not try something stupid. It’s one thing to be desperate to win at politics. It’s another to do real harm. After all, hasn’t the present ruling government done enough harm?

PS In case you are wondering, that is Flat Stanley in Rove’s hand in the above photo. Don’t ask me.

No rinse cycle please


Since I moved and now use a different VA hospital, I have to do all of my medical tests over. I am leaving in a few minutes to catch the light rail to the Dallas VA Hospital. There I will have my second MRI this year.

It beats me if they will learn anything more from this MRI than the one I had earlier this year. I don’t particularly like getting an MRI. It reminds me of climbing in a washing machine and letting people on the outside of the washer beat it rapidly with sticks.

Oh well. I guess I better get it over with.

Blame this post on Bill Clinton


The GOP plans to blame miscues in governing the country on Bush 41 if the tactic of blaming Bill Clinton fails.

Who is to blame for the current crisis with North Korea? If you believe the Republican robo-talking points, it’s Bill Clinton. In fact, Bill Clinton seems to be the easiest target on which to shift blame when something is amiss in the U.S. Who started the War Between the States? Bill Clinton. Who caused the Hindenburg Disaster? Bill Clinton. Who caused the Great Chicago Fire? Bill Clinton. Who did Monica Lewinsky … oh, that really was Bill Clinton.

It is somewhat astounding that the GOP would use as a scapegoat for virtually any failure the U.S. faces a president who has not been in office for more than six years. It’s like the smug Bush “W” bumper sticker that says: “Get over it!” Perhaps people should keep in mind that what has occurred in relation to our country since 2000 took place under Bush’s “watch.” So get over it.

The hard core, right-wing gab machines are among the most prolific users of Bill Clinton — the excuse. I refer to Limberger, Hannity, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Bill O’Reilly and the others who have made their fortunes in the Clinton-bashing business.

Interestingly enough, it seems some of the right-wing radio twits have begun to criticize Gee Dubya for some of our problems. I’m sure if a solid Democratic majority comes to power this year and after the next presidential election, one might see a lot more right-wing talking asses join the bandwagon. After all, you got to follow the money, right?

Are Americans smart enough to realize they have been played like a worn-out fiddle by the GOP for some time now? One can only hope. But then again, Americans elected Bush and the Republican majority now in Congress. Maybe voters have learned their lessons. But we shall see.