Safe from Fast Eddie

Tropical Storm Edouard turned out to be not a lot even though it made landfall in my county. Luckily, I didn’t have to work so after confirming that with my supervisor, I crawled back under the cover for another two hours and slept until 10 a.m. It certainly made for good sleeping weather. In addition to a little rain, the temp in the low 70s was heaven after a couple of days right at the edge of 100 degrees.

I have things to do and no great thoughts or revelations, not that I ever do. So I think I better mosey. Actually, in the spirit of the Olympics, I intend to go practice my 300-kilometer mosey.

Waiting on Fast Eddie

Well, here we are again playing the waiting game and wondering where Tropical Storm (and perhaps even Hurry-cane) Edouard is going to strike. As it is prudent to point out, however, where the center of the storm makes landfall isn’t always as pertinent as the general vicinity in which such as system will gather.
Since I am not a meteorologist — nor do I play one on TV — I can’t say for sure what will happen where I sit — about 45 miles from the Gulf of Mexico as the hurricane-launched debris flies. But if I were to believe a significant portion of what the real weather people predict, I would say Beaumont, Texas, which is currently under a tropical storm warning, will probably get some rain and some wind. The quantities of rain and wind velocity are just something we will have to wait upon to determine.
The other imponderables such as will there be flooding, or damage or power failure or some kind of other freak occurrence are also as they (whomever ‘they’ are) TBD (to be determined).
I for one plan to stay inside as much as possible providing I don’t have to work tomorrow. But, I will or I won’t. That is the nature of hurricane season.

Wishing upon a contemptable star

It is unlikely Karl Rove will ever be “frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs,” for which Joseph Wilson, a former U.S. ambassador and ex-CIA operative Valerie Plame’s husband, had expressed hope. Rove no longer works at the White House so that scenario is probably toast. But could Rove be locked in shackles and given a perp walk eventually?

In the real world, no. But it’s a nice thought and a federal judge’s ruling today makes such a wish at least a bit more possible.

U.S. District Judge John Bates in Washington ruled that congressional subpoenas for former White House counsel Harriet Miers and current Bush chief of staff Josh Bolton must be honored. Congress wants to hear what the two top Bush aides have to say in ongoing investigations into whether politics were responsible for firing federal prosecutors in 2006. The decision, which will probably be appealed, did not include Rove but might eventually depending on which judges hear what. (Oh and the law, wink, wink.) Sigh. I shouldn’t be so cynical should I?

This comes as the House Judiciary Committee voted Wednesday 20-14 to hold Rove in contempt of Congress for ignoring his subpoena and failing to show for a hearing on the sacking of the prosecutors.

While the act of contempt of Congress seems like a trivial matter — not to mention that many Americans hold certain congressional members in contempt — a conviction could ultimately land one in the slammer for up to one year. The last person to be convicted was former EPA official Rita Lavelle, who received six months in prison, five subsequent years of probation and a $10,000 fine for lying to Congress, according to an article about the statute on Wikipedia.

Rove will likely never go to jail because he has the White House and probably a majority of the Supreme Court on his side (See Bush v. Gore.) But always remember that our great land was built on dreams by dreamers and sometimes dreams (and so one hears, fairy tales) can come true. They can happen to you …

Planes, fires and cold, hard facts

An interesting Los Angeles Times article Tuesday points to dual cold-hard facts of life. The story by the Times’ Julie Cart and Bettina Boxall, unearths the revelation that these big air tankers one sees on TV or in real life dumping water or retardant upon wildfires are sometimes used for political show.

The article tells how right-wing Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter was frustrated when his area near San Diego, Calif., was going up in flames. Hunter, who under the GOP control of the House chaired the Armed Services Committee and failed in an attempt this year to gain the GOP presidential nomination, tried to persuade a U.S. Forest Service official to bring in air tankers to fight the fire. However, the official pointed out, quite prudently, that the winds at the time were too high and visibility was too poor in which the tankers could safely operate.

Hunter suggested the forest service official to call, on a private phone number Hunter had, then-Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Gen. Richard Myers. When the forestry guy declined, Hunter called Myers and, of course, tankers were on the way. That points out the other cold, hard fact of life: Power produces action.

Never mind that putting air tanker crews up in the air costs out the wazoo and flying in bad conditions endangers more lives. Having those giant planes up trailing pink dust behind it looks good to constituents of those such as Duncan Hunter. Political show and political power all wrapped up in one.

If you take that argument over the hill and around the bend you might just find the dirty little secret that I discovered when I worked as a firefighter. Sometimes, the act of putting out a fire itself is the more significant act than actually extinguishing the fire. For instance, sometimes it is more advantageous because of insurance considerations to just let a house burn rather than stop the fire and have a heavily damaged home.

But taxpayers don’t pay taxes for firemen to stand around, smoking cigarettes (yes, I used to do that but am happily 8 years removed from the habit), drinking water and the s**t while a home burns into nothing. Those same taxpayers don’t provide those bright, pretty fire trucks just so firefighters can drive them with lights and sirens blazing.

So there we have some cold, hard truths. What is the real bone in the biscuit here is when people such as Rep. Hunter use their power without consideration of the danger involved. Despite the PR aspect of it all politicians need to listen to the experts who do their job day in and day out rather than order others around like little toy soldiers. Of course, that brings out a third cold, hard fact: Politicians behaving sensibly is about as rare as Halley’s Comet.