Political theater on Cedar Creek Lake

You go to the lake house for a week and do the nor­mal lake house rou­tine. You fix things. You have a beer. Then you have another. It’s good that you fixed things.

In the morn­ing, you get the boat all ready and  you take off for a round of fish­ing. You come home, your luck was worse than poor. You take a nap. You get up. The wife has the ribeyes all thawed and you are ready to fire up the old grill. You eat. You sit out on the porch and enjoy the lake sounds, the loud out­board motors, the drunks next door, the loud music from across the lake. It’s time for bed. So much for the first full day. But what about tomorrow?

Well, if the lake where your home is located is Cedar Creek Lake, some 60 miles south­east of Dal­las, then you might think of going to catch a per­for­mance of the Seven Points City Coun­cil. It seems there are always fire­works there, per­haps you might see some­one get arrested there or even shot.

Seven Points is a town of 1,334, accord­ing to the 2009 U.S. Cen­sus esti­mate. It’s grown some­what over the years with Cedar Creek, a reser­voir built on the Trin­ity River, being a fish­ing and recre­ation haven for both East Tex­ans and those from the Dallas-Fort Worth area. It also seems to have a his­tory of the worst that comes out of small town politics.

A polit­i­cal don­ny­brook of epic pro­por­tions, pro­por­tion­ally speak­ing, erupted in 1997 when then-Mayor Mar­ian Hill was removed from office by the city coun­cil for a num­ber of zon­ing law vio­la­tions and some mat­ters over pur­chas­ing a pager and copy­ing machine. Hill had divorced ear­lier that year. Keep that in the back of your mind.

Not long after she was removed from office, Hill was pros­e­cuted for a num­ber of the zon­ing law vio­la­tions, some­thing that had never or rarely had been done in that town.  Hill later claimed in a law­suit that her ex-husband, the town’s police chief, zon­ing offi­cial and some other city coun­cil mem­bers had cooked up a scheme to “run her out of town,” accord­ing to an ulti­mate rul­ing by the 5th U.S. Cir­cuit Court of Appeals. Read it and good luck fol­low­ing it.

I remem­ber read­ing about all of this and my thoughts returned to Cedar Creek Lake this week­end. A group of my col­lege friends and I got together at some friends’ place near Fort Worth. One of this group of friends had access to a lake house when we were in col­lege, as his par­ents owned the very pleas­ant get­away. When one or more of this group of friends or I were there we would gen­er­ally be the ones mak­ing noise, fueled usu­ally by keg beers or play­ing “quar­ters” with what kind of “bear in a bot­tle” that was handy.

This after­noon I decided to look at some news­pa­per Web sites of towns in the Cedar Creek area and I came across a story in the Cedar Creek Pilot that made me think I was just read­ing a con­tin­u­a­tion of the Mar­ian Hill story in some form or fashion.

The extremely thor­ough and often hilar­i­ous news story writ­ten by the Pilot’s Art Lawler told of the hijinks of the now for­mer mayor in which the ex offi­cial engaged in a tirade in the city coun­cil cham­bers after a quo­rum for their meet­ing failed. The fail­ing quo­rum, caused by three mem­bers miss­ing, seems to be a ser­ial occur­ance there since this made the fourth-straight failed meet­ing since a new mayor was elected.

Now, just as it takes a pro­gram to know the play­ers in the Mar­ian Hill story, one like­wise needs to be “read into” this affair before try­ing to fig­ure just who hates whom and why. The so-called “shout­ing match” at the coun­cil was allegedly at the behest of for­mer mayor Ger­ald Tay­lor, after his reported polit­i­cal enemy Mayor Joe Dobbs can­celed the meeting.

Tay­lor was arrested in Decem­ber 2009 on charges he cashed per­sonal checks using munic­i­pal court funds. The city judge, Mon­ica Corker,  had been arrested the month before on charges she helped Tay­lor cash the checks.

As for the source of ani­mos­ity between Tay­lor and Dobbs, I’m not sure. Dobbs is openly gay and he says that Tay­lor and oth­ers have a vendetta against him. Dobbs was also fire chief and demoted Tay­lor from assis­tant fire chief to fire­fighter after eth­i­cal con­cerns, he said in an arti­cle on the Dal­las Voice Web site, the DF-W area’s lead­ing gay-lesbian news­pa­per. Tay­lor report­edly responded to  Dobbs with a rather col­or­ful homo­pho­bic epithet.

Dobbs say some in Seven Points are “play­ing games with him,” the arti­cle, writ­ten by David Webb, said. While that remains a dis­tinct pos­si­bil­ity just because of the way cer­tain peo­ple are wired, it also is pos­si­ble that Dobbs is just a player him­self in what seems to be con­tin­ual polit­i­cal the­ater at Seven Points. It seems a lit­tle bit like old time soap opera fare. Watch and then tune back in some­time 20 years later and you catch up but every­thing seems pretty much the same. That is a lot like the way it is in Seven Points. The more things change, the more they the remain the same old thing.

It looks like a Greene and kooky mid-term race

This is shap­ing up to be one of the nut­ti­est mid-term elec­tions on record. Here in Texas you have Repub­li­cans pos­si­bly fund­ing the Green Party. In Nevada, even a lot of Democ­rats would love to have just about any­one but Harry Reid back in the Sen­ate, with the pos­si­ble excep­tion of that any­one being GOP can­di­date Shar­ron Angle. Reid and Angle are cur­rently squab­bling over the Sen­ate Major­ity Leader’s cam­paign using snip­pets from pre­vi­ous Angle Web sites when she was going more toward the “Tea Party Look.” Hey, that Pro­hi­bi­tion thing worked well didn’t it Shar­ron, and you think we should try it again along with con­tin­u­ing to crim­i­nal­ize pot?

Best of all in the race for the kook­i­est can­di­date con­test has got to be Al Greene. No, not the smooth-voiced pur­veyor of soul and R & B, the Rev. Al Green, who gave us clas­sics such as “Take Me to the River” and “Love and Happiness.”

Take me to the river, Alvin Green, and drown me please!

No, instead, we’re talk­ing Alvin Green, the 32-year-old unem­ployed vet­eran who came out of nowhere to win the South Car­olina Demo­c­ra­tic pri­mary elec­tion for the U.S. Sen­ate. Some Democ­rats have sus­pected that Green was a plant by GOP for some odi­ous rea­son or the other. That would be intrigu­ing enough, given Green’s per­sona is one of hav­ing been put into his present sit­u­a­tion as some kind of Dave Chap­pelle char­ac­ter. But the top­per is that Green believes he can make jobs for those in South Car­olina who go work mak­ing Alvin Green, the action fig­ure. You heard me. Action Fig­ure Alvin Green, come to save the day in South Carolina!

I can just see those per­cent­ages of the unem­ployed falling like a Rocky Moun­tain avalanche. And only an hour ago I was won­der­ing what the hell was there to write about.

Ah, it’s so good having great hair!

A lit­tle Fri­day after­noon light­heart­ed­ness at the expense of my not-at-all-favorite-governor. Hat tip to Burnt Orange Report.

YouTube Preview Image

Barton not the lone ranger. House group including E. Texas reps bemoan a “Chicago-style” shakedown

Oh this is rich.

I found this press release by a con­gres­sional cau­cus of right-wingers. Among them are Joe Bar­ton, but also are most, if not all, of the Lone Star State’s GOP House members.

The Repub­li­can Study Com­mit­tee called the fund agreed to by Pres­i­dent Obama and BP chief Tony Hay­ward “a Chicago-style shake­down.” I have yet to see any apol­ogy from this cau­cus. Even more rich, I’ve not seen any apolo­gies from our own East Texas con­gres­sional mem­bers. Among these mem­bers are Rep. Ted Poe, whose dis­trict includes the Upper Texas Coast and part of the Hous­ton metro area; Rep. Kevin Brady, who rep­re­sents the heart of East Texas; and Rep. Louie Gohmert, the con­gress­man for the north­ern por­tion of East Texas.

I haven’t heard any­one men­tion this yet, but it looks like Bar­ton wasn’t the lone idiot in sug­gest­ing BP were vic­tims of extor­tion by our government.

Fending off the oil while waiting for history to make

A lot of dif­fer­ent thoughts cloud my mind right now regard­ing the mas­sive Gulf of Mex­ico oil leak. Pri­mar­ily, I think we need to “stop the damn leak.” But that has proved to be some kind of difficult.

I am glad that the pun­dits and those who oppose the Pres­i­dent are so right and sure about mat­ters that they can lay every­thing at Obama’s feet. I feel his­tory will judge whether he acted swiftly enough and surely enough. I can’t help but think Obama is not only get­ting some bad advice, but has for quite some time received bad advice. I say that just tak­ing all in total. That too, how­ever, will only be judged by history.

The pun­dits have me pretty irked. This Newsweek arti­cle aptly tells how I feel about the pun­dits before and after the president’s speech on the oil spill. CNN made such a big deal about the broad­cast com­ing from the Oval Office and essen­tially com­pared the speech to other great events like Nixon’s res­ig­na­tion, Rea­gan talk­ing about the Space Shut­tle Challenger’s explo­sion and GW Bush speak­ing from the Oval after 9/11. To those on the Gulf Coast, this event is per­haps that momen­tous, but the pun­ditry just goes way over­board inter­pret­ing sym­bol­ism sometimes.

Finally, Texas Repub­li­can Rep. Joe Bar­ton made one of the most shame­ful remarks a leg­is­la­tor could make today when he apol­o­gized dur­ing a con­gres­sional hear­ing on the oil spill to BP CEO Tony Hayward.

Yes, the same Joe Bar­ton who has never met an energy com­pany exec­u­tive with a bag full of money he didn’t like had the gall to call the meet­ing between Obama and Hay­ward yes­ter­day in the White House “a shake­down.” Talk­ing about pot call­ing the ket­tle black. How many oil com­pany and elec­tric com­pany and nuclear power com­pany exec­u­tives have Joe Bar­ton shaken down over the years? Of course, if they got rid of all the hyp­ocrites in Con­gress most of the two cham­bers, includ­ing pretty much all the GOP sides, would be missing.

It gets a lit­tle old to see the con­gres­sional mem­bers get their lit­tle spot­light in which they can either light into the vil­lain of the day or else kiss their asses.

We shall see what we shall see. Too bad all those folks on the Gulf Coast have their lives hang­ing in the bal­ance while we wait on that which becomes history.

UPDATE: Bar­ton later apol­o­gized for the “mis­con­struc­tion” of his com­ments toward Hay­ward after appar­ently being threat­ened with the loss of a House com­mit­tee posi­tion by GOP lead­er­ship. The dress­ing down must have been with House Minor­ity Leader John Boehner hold­ing his nose. It seems the Ohio pol bought some $50,000 in BP stock just months before the explo­sion and sink­ing of the Deep­wa­ter Hori­zon rig from which the mas­sive oil spill began. On the other hand. Maybe Boehner was jeal­ous that he didn’t shake­down BP after its wealth spi­raled downward.

Charlie Wilson of “Charlie Wilson’s War” dead at 76

Char­lie Wil­son, the Texas con­gress­man who inspired the book and movie Char­lie Wilson’s War, died today at the age of 76.

Wil­son was prob­a­bly the most col­or­ful politi­cian I, sort of, knew. I say, “sort of,” because I didn’t know him well enough for him to recall my name although, if he ever had the occa­sion to know it, he sure as heck would have found it out quickly. Char­lie rep­re­sented the area of Texas — first in the Texas Leg­is­la­ture and later dur­ing 12 terms in the U.S. House — I lived in for most of my life. Of course, I moved around some and even left South­east Texas sev­eral times for a few years at a pop  but returned. Also, polit­i­cal lines being what they are, where I lived at the time may or may not have been served by Charlie.

I prob­a­bly could have made that whole para­graph shorter by say­ing Char­lie rep­re­sented me from the time I was a kid until I was an adult in my 40s. That’s some time.

My link above is to Wilson’s home­town paper, The Lufkin Daily News. It looks like they have all hands on deck for this story, which one would expect. Their early cov­er­age looks pretty thor­ough although most papers have obit­u­ar­ies long on hand for promi­nent people.

But more than his longevity, Char­lie will be remem­bered more for his devil may care atti­tude. “Good Time Char­lie” is one of his nick­names. He liked to party and have good look­ing women around him. There is the famous line about some­one ask­ing Char­lie, upon see­ing all these fan­tas­tic look­ers work­ing for him in his con­gres­sional office, what it was all about. Char­lie said: “You can teach them to type but you can’t teach them to grow tits.”

Wil­son was never known in Con­gress for his abil­ity to pass land­mark or high-profile leg­is­la­tion. But his legacy will be his secret and some­times sin­gu­lar fight to fund Afghan rebels when they fought an occu­py­ing Soviet Army in the 1980s. His hijinks and his suc­cesses are chron­i­cled in the book-turned-movie by George Crile in which Wil­son was por­trayed by Tom Hanks.

As a politi­cian and as a con­gress­man, Char­lie will also have a legacy that only those who lived in his con­gres­sional dis­trict knew. That was his so-called “con­stituent ser­vices.” These are things such as ensur­ing some long-suffering vet­eran gets his pen­sion or help­ing some­one get their Social Secu­rity checks. Such ser­vices and even what some call “pork” which puts jobs in a com­mu­nity and bread on the table are what get con­gress­men elected. And, Wil­son and his staff were among the best at serv­ing their con­stituents. It’s why lit­tle old ladies in the Bible Belt just loved Char­lie, no mat­ter that he trou­ble with drink­ing and dri­ving or alleged use of cocaine.

Prob­a­bly no one but Char­lie Wilson’s staff could have got­ten a medal from the Soviet Union for my late father, whose ships deliv­ered goods to Vladi­vos­tok dur­ing World War II. It’s a long story, but I wanted to honor my Dad who wasn’t even rec­og­nized as a vet­eran at the time of his death in 1984 — it would be sev­eral years later that Con­gress passed leg­is­la­tion finally mak­ing Mer­chant Marine mil­i­tary vet­er­ans — despite his hav­ing served dur­ing hos­tile action on board a mer­chant ship.

Char­lie was cer­tainly a pres­ence when he was around you. He could BS with the best of them. That’s high praise for a Texan. The world was cer­tainly made more inter­est­ing by hav­ing Char­lie Wil­son in it.

Scott Brown: Pretty boy, father of the year wins in Mass

 The news that Repub­li­can Scott Brown beat Demo­c­rat Martha Coak­ley last night in the race for the long-held Demo­c­ra­tic seat for U.S. Sen­ate in Mass­a­chu­setts doesn’t upset me.

 One has to expect lit­tle bumps in the road here and there. Plus, the fact that it was Brown — who once posed nude in Cos­mopoli­tan – as vic­tor makes the story even bet­ter. Brown even man­aged to thor­oughly embar­rass his two college-age daugh­ters in his accep­tance speech by telling the world his girls “were avail­able.” I mean that is just plain wrong! That even dis­gusts me.

 Such com­ments and Brown’s past has even given right-wing cable freak Glenn Beck the willies. Beck said he didn’t trust Brown and that the new senator’s tenure “could end with a dead intern.”

 The real­ity was Coak­ley ran her cam­paign ini­tially as if she was the cho­sen one, mean­ing she didn’t do did­dley squat. Even if she was run­ning against a corpse for the U.S. Sen­ate she should have been out their cam­paign­ing her heart out.

 As for all the dire pre­dic­tions by the pun­dits and GOP talk­ing heads and cable news con­stantly jonesing for polit­i­cal con­flict, this might not be as big as every­one makes it. It might not stop health care reform. The Democ­rats still have a major­ity in Con­gress and they’d like to have a super major­ity, but because of Brown they don’t. Con­gress could pass health care through rec­on­cil­i­a­tion — pass­ing a bud­get bill in the Sen­ate with­out fil­li­buster – or per­haps they could piece­meal it. They may drop it alto­gether, but I can’t really see that as Obama has so much invested in pass­ing health care reform.

Another stupid story sinks amid death and destruction

It’s funny — not in the “ha-ha” way but in the sad way — how it takes total dev­as­ta­tion and thou­sands of lives to knock a stu­pid, noth­ing story off the front page and off cable news.

But that is just what the tragic and ultra-destructive earth­quake in Haiti did to “Negro­gate,” the furor over the slip of the tongue among friends that was never meant as a malig­nant com­ment. Look even on the Web page of the most polit­i­cally polar­iz­ing cable news net­work, Fox, and you don’t see any­thing about Harry Reid on the main page — or at least I didn’t this after­noon. There are hardly any polit­i­cal sto­ries on there at all. It’s all Haiti, where it right­fully should be.

The all-Harry-Reid-beating-all-the-time has stopped, for now. That is even though the stu­pid­ity of “the mes­sage” has become all pol­i­tics. It has to have polit­i­cal polar­iza­tion or it is not on cable news, at least. But such stu­pid sto­ries haven’t always been lim­ited to party pol­i­tics. Remem­ber Chan­dra Levy?

I have men­tioned here before but I think it is worth men­tion­ing again the worst “sort-of-true” pre­dic­tion I ever made.

In August 2001, when Gee Dubya was out cut­ting brush all day on the Craw­ford ranch, not much was in the news. That is except for the Chan­dra Levy-Gary Con­dit story.

Dur­ing that time I was sit­ting in a hold­ing room at an air­port in Waco await­ing Air Force One’s arrival. I for­get the occa­sion. I was among a group of reporters and news pho­tog­ra­phers who were wait­ing to be screened, mostly for the photographer’s cam­era equip­ment, by the Secret Ser­vice and the then ATF. Our con­ver­sa­tions ended up on the Chandra-gate, I mean no dis­re­spect to the mur­dered woman, but the story did not merit the media’s shock and awe it was given.

One news pho­tog­ra­pher, pre­dictably from CNN, said he thought the Levy story was a great one. I said I thought it was a dud, but I added, “It will prob­a­bly stay as the lead until some­one crashes an air­liner into the Empire State Building.”

We were just jour­nal­ists talk­ing. We engaged in gal­lows humor and idiocy because of what we’ve expe­ri­enced or because we were just a bunch of geeks. Never did I ever imag­ine some­thing sim­i­lar as I pre­dicted would hap­pen in less than a month. I really did feel bad about mak­ing that com­ment after 9/11.

In real­ity, the Harry Reid story is even less com­pelling, and cer­tainly even less dra­matic and inter­est­ing than the Levy story. Reid was being just like I was among those geeks in Waco. He didn’t mean any­thing by it. But for good mea­sure and the sake of the black vote, Reed apol­o­gized and Pres­i­dent Obama said “de nada.”

The seman­tics of the Sen­ate Major­ity Leader’s ver­bal faux pas — sorry I didn’t mean to have to chi-chi for­eign words so close together — are about the only thing inter­est­ing in this whole mess. It’s not like Reid used the “N” word, or as the lit­tle ol’ white ladies I grew up around used to say politely, “Nigra.” He didn’t even say “col­ored.” If some blacks are offended, I’m sorry. But if they are, I think they could more con­struc­tively put that upset toward being used by the Repub­li­cans to  put one more hole in the Democ­rats’ big tent.

I am no Harry Reid fan. Ditto for Nancy Pelosi. I would rather see decent Democ­rats elected than both of those what­ev­ers. But some­times I just wish stu­pid­ity could be abol­ished, at least just for a lit­tle while. Maybe it can be put aside to help some folks, mostly “of color,” who are hurt­ing really bad in Haiti.

First endorsement of the year: Texas House District 9

Demo­c­rat Ken­neth Franks will once again chal­lenge incum­bent Repub­li­can Rep. Wayne Chris­t­ian for the Texas House, Dis­trict 9, race in November.

Franks, a retired teacher and now rancher and busi­ness­man from Pineland, announced his can­di­dacy in an e-mail to eight feet deep sent Tues­day. Chris­t­ian was first elected to the House in 1995. Chris­t­ian is a finan­cial advi­sor from Cen­ter. He has served six terms in the Texas House. Chris­t­ian advises poten­tial investors on his Web site: “Those want­ing to “play the mar­ket” might want to move on to another site. Our clients pro­vide us their “seri­ous” dol­lars they don’t desire to lose.” A staunch con­ser­v­a­tive, Chris­t­ian said he was hon­ored to be named one of the “worst leg­is­la­tors” by Texas Monthly. So proud is he.

Both state Demo­c­ra­tic and Repub­li­can party Web sites, checked today, indi­cated Franks and Chris­t­ian will have no pri­mary elec­tion chal­lengers. The fil­ing dead­line was Monday.

Dis­trict 9 encom­passes the Piney­woods coun­ties of Shelby, Nacog­doches, Jasper, San Augus­tine and Sabine with a total pop­u­la­tion of almost 140,000 res­i­dents, accord­ing to the 2000 Census.

Chris­t­ian defeated Franks by 62–35 per­cent dur­ing the Novem­ber 2008 Gen­eral Elec­tion. He is pres­i­dent of the Texas Con­ser­v­a­tive Coali­tion, which its Web site says is for indi­vid­ual lib­erty, lim­ited gov­ern­ment, free enter­prise and tra­di­tional fam­ily values.

But even though Rep. Chris­t­ian might espouse some of those virtues, Chris­t­ian does not seem both­ered by favors askew with these val­ues when it serves the Rep­re­sen­ta­tive or his friends. One won­ders if  Wayne Chris­t­ian was think­ing lim­ited gov­ern­ment and indi­vid­ual lib­erty when he sneaked in a last-minute bill  allow­ing recon­struc­tion of  his beach house on Boli­var Penin­sula – out of his leg­isla­tive dis­trict — which was con­sid­ered by the state as open beach after the prop­erty was rearranged by Hur­ri­cane Ike. Per­haps Chris­t­ian and his ilk see lim­ited gov­ern­ment as good gov­ern­ment … just as long as it is good for Rep. Chris­t­ian and his beach neighbors.

I don’t know Ken­neth Franks very well, mostly our con­ver­sa­tions have been via e-mail. We do have some friends and rel­a­tives in com­mon. I also wouldn’t be hon­est if I said I knew all of the pol­icy posi­tions of either Mr. Franks or Rep. Chris­t­ian. But I do know a lit­tle of the non-policy side of Ken­neth Franks.

Ken­neth grew up in the home of an edu­ca­tor and he spent almost 30 years as a teacher. He was in the inau­gural class at Angelina Junior Col­lege — now Angelina Col­lege — in Lufkin. He trans­ferred to The Uni­ver­sity of Texas in Austin where he received his under­grad­u­ate degree. He later received a Master’s of Edu­ca­tion from Stephen F. Austin, back in the Piney­woods, in Nacog­doches. He has taught in schools from 5A to Class A clas­si­fi­ca­tion.  After retir­ing from teach­ing, Ken­neth now ranches and oper­ates a car wash.

It is per­haps the edu­ca­tion side that dri­ves Ken­neth to want stu­dent test­ing to be mean­ing­ful and not pun­ta­tive. Ken­neth, accord­ing to cam­paign infor­ma­tion on his Web site, sup­ports pay that will actu­ally pro­vide  bet­ter lives for teach­ers and sup­port staffs. He also sup­ports fully fund­ing man­dates that will make col­lege tuition more afford­able for all eli­gi­ble stu­dents and to help poten­tial teach­ers  with more finan­cial assistance.

I spent a lot of time in sev­eral of the coun­ties of Dis­trict 9. Add up the three times I lived  there, and I would have lived roughly a quar­ter of my life in Nacog­doches County. It’s been awhile since I lived there but it will always feel like a “sec­ond home­town” to me. That is one rea­son I want a good Demo­c­ra­tic state rep­re­sen­ta­tive for Dis­trict 9. The other rea­son is Texas needs more Democ­rats in the Leg­is­la­ture. I’m talk­ing Dems who will actu­ally rep­re­sent and do the state’s busi­ness and not those Dems or GOP-ers who are only inter­ested in bet­ter posi­tion­ing themselves.

I think Ken­neth will be a fine state rep­re­sen­ta­tive who hap­pens to be a Demo­c­rat. So my first offi­cial endorse­ment of 2010, for what it’s worth, is for Ken­neth Franks for Dis­trict 9, Texas House of Representatives.

Congressional panels: Improving government or political grandstanding?

 It is dif­fi­cult for me to recall but I am almost cer­tain that I did not go to the bath­room dur­ing my only visit to the U.S. Capi­tol some five or six years ago. I feel pretty sure about that fact because I have not yet been inves­ti­gated by a con­gres­sional committee.

 I did have some­thing I wrote in a news­pa­per col­umn once read into the Con­gres­sional Record. That was nice. But, no, I have never been grilled by Con­gress for using the bath­room at the Capi­tol or any­where else for that matter.

 The rea­son I bring the mat­ter up is because Con­gress seems primed for an pub­li­cized inquiry any­time they catch some­one using the Capi­tol water clos­ets. Now that is pure hyper­bole but I use the state­ment because large-scale con­gres­sional inves­ti­ga­tions some­times seem as if they are more often than not dis­pro­por­tion­ate to the impor­tance of the sub­ject under scrutiny.

 Now I cer­tainly believe that an inquiry might be war­ranted into how the glam cou­ple and per­haps future real­ity TV stars, the Salahis, allegedly crashed the White House state din­ner for the Indian prime min­is­ter. How­ever, the fact that the show in Con­gress seems to be ampli­fied by Repub­li­can Rep. Peter King of New York, the rank­ing oppo­si­tion mem­ber of the Home­land Secu­rity Com­mit­tee, makes it obvi­ous that King might just be more inter­ested in hurt­ing Obama and  his staff mem­bers than wor­ry­ing about the safety of the Pres­i­dent him­self. King now has beat that dead horse to the point that he is will­ing to hear from the White House social direc­tor while she is not under oath or before cam­eras.  It looks as if that repro­bate King might have just drilled him­self a dry hole. In case you haven’t guessed, I’m not a big fan of Peter King. I think the best descrip­tion of him remains that from Slate media critic Jack Shafer who called King “an explod­ing car­bun­cle mas­querad­ing as a mem­ber of Congress.”

 Mean­while, the Sen­ate Judi­ciary Com­mit­tee is busy­ing them­selves try­ing to exploit exam­ine the leak of a sen­si­tive Trans­porta­tion Secu­rity Admin­is­tra­tion doc­u­ment. The 90-some-odd-page man­ual on how to screen air­line pas­sen­gers was posted, for awhile, on the Inter­net. Home­land Secu­rity Sec­re­tary Janet Napoli­tano said “action” has been taken against those respon­si­ble. I’m not sure what she meant by that. Per­haps they were made to stand in line at a TSA screen­ing sta­tion for 24 hours. Or maybe they were sub­jected to con­tin­ual body cav­ity searches.

 A lot of good can come from these con­gres­sional inquiries. For instance, learn­ing about chinks (and no, I am not mak­ing a racial slur against Chi­nese peo­ple!) in the armor of White House secu­rity can help make the Prez’s place more secure. And surely the TSA screen­ing process has room for improve­ment. They can take me off their “watch list” or what­ever it was that caused me to be denied an online board­ing pass dur­ing my depar­ture from Hous­ton to Mem­phis in Octo­ber. This after­noon I have filled out a form to send their redress pro­gram so maybe I won’t find myself in a dark lit­tle room being man­han­dled in the nude by two for­mer Russ­ian women wrestlers who now are TSA secu­rity peo­ple. Or I might just make things worse for myself. One never knows.

 Nonethe­less, if I was in charge con­gres­sional inquiries would help improve mat­ters rather than used as a plat­form to blud­geon polit­i­cal foes. Or else, if I was in change, I might be out on a big yatch some­where fish­ing. I can’t say. I’m not in charge and likely I will never rise to such a high station.