Fair and balanced?

Someone on a cable news show or perhaps an article I read in the last few days — I don’t remember who — said that one needs a libretto to follow the goings on with Congress and the debt ceiling crisis. For those of you who don’t know what a libretto is, yes some folks are operatically deprived, it is the text of an opera or other type of musical theater. That is a highfalutin’ way of expressing the more common saying: “You can’t tell the players without a program,” which also applies to opera. Opera shopura. Any way one wants to look at matters what is happening in Congress now is mostly a clusterf**k.

Why matters are so screwed up that it even has Fox News doing more than paying lip service to their “fair and balanced” motto by pointing out some really astute analysis of why proposing a Balanced Budget Amendment into the mix with the debt ceiling legislation is not the best of moves. Personally, I’m against such an amendment even though I am for a balanced budget. I just happen to believe that changes to the U.S. Constitution should be for matters that we likely couldn’t attain for ourselves if the federal government did not intervene, matters such as ending slavery or giving women the right to vote. You mean women can vote?

Once again federal beneficiaries and employees face the possibility of not being paid if Congress fails to meet a deadline, and quite frankly, I am kind of fed up with such possibilities.

Congress, at large, needs to get their ducks in the water. That includes all parties. President Obama needs to shape up as well. He is becoming a big disappointment.

I am tired from my drive back from San Antonio this afternoon so I will just leave matters alone here and hope some improvement comes along just as did the rain to our drought-stricken land.

Ah, to be represented by a hero in our great Congress …

“We can’t all be heroes, because somebody has to sit on the curb and clap as they go by.” — Will Rogers, (1879-1935) American humorist and actor.

One important element I learned in military service was to follow orders, if for no other reason than to not be punished. The law the military lives by, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, is not exactly your everyday law lived by everyone else in this great nation of laws called the U.S. of A. Those who have lived under this code might find this understatement worth a chuckle. Others who know not of what I speak can just kind of take the statement as is or however they choose.

A politician whom some say is a hero of the Iraq War is in a bit of a verbal tussle for speaking rather ill, unattractively and certainly impolitic for one who has the tag — whether or not deserved — hung around him as a hero. Republican U.S. Rep. Allen West, a retired Army lieutenant colonel, said some things that just seem out of place for a southerner who represents a Florida district which includes West Palm Beach. His target of ire is Democratic National Committee Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, who also represents a nearby Florida district.

The war of words came from, what else, the debt limit argument between the Ds and Rs.

Wasserman-Schultz said during a debate on the debt limit that she found it difficult to believe West would vote to cut Medicare benefits for thousands of his constituents who, as is the case in the congresswoman’s district, depend on Medicare. West, our hero, responded with an e-mail calling his Florida neighbor and colleague “the most vile, unprofessional, and despicable member of the U.S. House of Representatives.” Delivering a real blow as a southerner, the retired colonel told the congresswoman that “You have proven repeatedly that you are not a Lady, therefore, shall not be afforded due respect from me!” Yow!

So much for a person who was once commissioned by the Congress as “an officer and a gentleman.”

In fact, actions by West prove that he wasn’t much to write home about on the “officer” side as well.

You might or might not remember West as he was one of the first, perhaps the only, “right-wing” hero of the war that the right wing started in Iraq for no real reasons of national security. West was an artillery battalion command for the 4th Infantry Division in Iraq during a 2003 deployment. As was the case with other soldiers in Iraq during the war, West would incur duties that had nothing at all to do with his training or experience. In one instance, West was involved in the questioning of an Iraqi civilian police leader.

Heavily redacted investigations documents, show that West admitted that the police officer was beaten by the lieutenant colonel’s subordinates during questioning because the suspect was being “evasive and beligerent.” West admitted during his own questioning that he witnessed “sporadic body punches” given by his underlings to the man being questioned although West did not “allow (it) to get too brutal.” West finally unholstered his 9-mm pistol after the colonel said he had “had enough and this is where it would end.”

West said under his own questioning for his military law investigation that he fired his pistol about a foot from the Iraqi’s head after pushing the police leader’s head near a “clearing barrel,” used to “clear” a round in a gun in an unknown status by firing it into a barrel with sand before entering a building or other area. West admitted under questioning that firing his gun near the suspect’s head did not break his suspect. In fact, the Iraqi didn’t talk after his beating and having a 9-mm pistol shot into a barrel next to his head. West said the “man inside him probably did want to inflict hurt” on the Iraqi although he was just trying to gather intelligence for his men.

Superiors of West awarded him a “non-judicial punishment,” meaning not a court-martial and charges against the career officer were not considered felonies against the U.S. Government. West was find $5,000 and allowed to retire.

What a hero, huh? Maybe some say so, but that was not the way troops, especially leaders of West’s rank, are supposed to act. West became a Tea Party darling and now he hurls invectives at a fellow congressional member who is also from a neighboring district.

My complaints here aren’t so much of Allen West’s insults at Rep. Wasserman-Schultz. The congresswoman is a pretty tough lady, if you ask me. She went through a number of surgeries fighting breast cancer. A battle she has survived while serving in Congress. I think that’s pretty damned heroic in itself. The words used by West are pretty civil considering some debates I have had. But this is not the way folks are supposed to act in the U.S. Congress. If you think different, then perhaps you should get your lackey there to get it changed.

No, my main irritant is someone like West who is treated like a hero, yet he can’t pass the deportment grade in the military and puts other troops in danger with his cowboy actions. Plus the fact that this so-called hero shows his mettle by insulting a fellow member of Congress and a neighbor. If this is the kind  of “hero” you want ruling your country, perhaps you should consider moving even more South into the Banana Republics.

A note of interest I found while researching this story: A little Wikipedia Kung Fu was a-happening.  Allen West’s Wikipedia site had as a last sentence on the first paragraph stating that the congressman was to “the right of Genghis Khan.” That was changed before I concluded my post to something less excitable. I didn’t closely read Rep. Wasserman-Schultz’s WIki entry but looking at an entry about her congressional district I noted that it was represented by her and home to a high concentration of gay and lesbians, and gay neighborhoods. Whether that came from West or Wasserman-Schultz, I don’t know, nor do I care.



 

A note or two for the day

Just a note or two on the headlines.

First, it’s raining, but just a little bit. Just a little bit here and there and a lot there and here. That’s the way things go down here on the coast in the summertime, when as Mungo Jerry sang: “… and the weather is high, you can stretch right up and touch the sky.” Then, something, something about having women on your mind. It’s probably because of those little bikinis and thongs. Oh my goodness. Some folks get weirded out about a 55-year-old man talking about things like bikinis and thongs. Grow the f**k up, Junior!

But it looks like we will just get rains in fits and spurts like always until that tropical storm comes along and sits off the coast for a few days. We can only wish. The fits and spurts have made some progress here on the Upper Texas Coast though. We’ve had some pretty significant downpours. I’m sure you are interested in our weather here. Sorry, I’ve tried writing about other matters and came up short.

The Independent of London reports the death of Sean Hoare, the whistleblower of the News Corp scandal is not suspicious, according to British investigators. Hmmm. Coming on the heels of the Murdoch media empire tumbling down, the death of the whistleblower who made it all happens isn’t suspicious? Why it is to me.

An editorial in The Wall Street Journal, one of the News Corp properties in the U.S. along with Fox “Faux” News, says the liberal media and critics of Murdoch have just been piling on. When all else fails, blame it on the liberal media. Personally, it wouldn’t hurt me one iota to see Fox News tank. I have said and I continue to say that Fox News is nothing more than a propaganda tool for the right wing.  And yes, I include their news operation, especially their news operation. They should know better.

Finally, here is hoping a new, good and fair collective bargaining agreement gets approved by the NFL players. Yeah, the players make millions. They deserve it for a four or five year career that can leave them crippled for life with traumatic arthritis and brain damage. It’s their fault though, right? Well, yes, or their parents or coaches or teachers or school board or television or Wheaties or the Punt, Pass and Kick program or the late Dandy Don Meredith. They shouted out, “who killed the Kennedys, when after all, it was you and me,” ah “Sympathy For The Devil” a Rolling Stones classic. I can still see Mick Jagger way down there on the floor of the Louisiana Superdome singing/shouting “Pleased to meet you, hope you guess my name … ” It’s a great song. Don’t judge a book by its cover. Have a good rest of the day.

College credits for vets: A good idea if it works

Our good-haired governor has, for a moment at least, left the national stage to promote a bill that might help veterans with education and jobs down the road.

Gov. Rick “Good Hair” Perry is touting a program penned by Democratic Sen. Leticia Van De Putte of San Antonio which would encourage colleges and the state’s workforce commission to work together toward granting some college credits for veterans military experience. Perry today ceremonially signed the “College Credits for Heroes” program which:

” … helps veterans and military service members transition to civilian life by applying their skills and experience to help them graduate more quickly and save money on tuition,”  Perry said.

Perry apparently thought he would spend a little time in Texas prior to his big day of “Prayer and Fasting” on Aug. 6. Were the governor in touch with many real Texans he would find that more were “praying they don’t have to fast.” The Good Hair has still not made up his mind about a presidential bid despite most Texas political pundits saying a decision is likely in “one or two days,” something those pundits have been saying now for two months.

I have never really cared for the cliche “the devil is in the details.” But if one looks at what details there are in Senate Bill 1736, the legislation Sen. Van De Putte wrote for the veterans college program, one gets a distinct feeling we have heard this all before. This is especially so if the “we” are veterans from the past 30 or so years. The legislation states:

(b)  The (Texas Workforce) commission shall establish and administer the College Credit for Heroes demonstration program to identify, develop, and support methods to maximize academic or workforce education credit awarded by institutions of higher education to veterans and military service members for military experience, education, and training obtained during military service in order to expedite the entry of veterans and military service members into the workforce.

“(c)  The commission shall work cooperatively with other state agencies, including the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, public junior colleges, and other institutions of higher education, to accomplish the purposes of this section.”

I can’t say that the state has tried anything similar in the past three decades or so. My institutional memory of Texas legislation doesn’t go back that distance. But I know there have been countless efforts both through the federal government and the military which would help convert military jobs toward civilian educational credit. Since 1942 the American Council on Education has evaluated military schools, correspondence courses and occupations to determine how much and what level of academic credit each should be awarded to veterans. This is being done currently through programs such as DANTES (Defense Activity for Non-Traditional Education Support) with support also coming from individual military service programs. Even more than 30  years ago when I served in the Navy it was possible for many military personnel to earn at least associate degrees and programs have greatly expanded since then.

That is not to say such a program as Van De Putte established in legislation and our governor signed isn’t a helpful one in theory. From what I have personally experienced and have heard from other veterans, the biggest stumbling block in converting military service into college credit has been the colleges themselves. There is and probably will always be an “Ivory Tower” mindset that thinks the military is made of people who lacked the intellect go to college or at least could not attend a good college.

The legislation SB 1736 is another one of those pieces of law with its heart in the right place, that being for veterans. If it is yet another program that ends up in an endless bureaucratic loop of government, military and academia, then the effort is probably just a waste of time and tax money.

The race is on: Who will not be my congressman?

You have no doubt heard the old expression: “Thank God for small favors.”

Well, one may thank whomever they choose in this country but I am thankful this afternoon to Republican Congressman Ron Paul. You see, Paul announced today he would not seek re-election to the U.S. House, where he has held a seat for 24 years. Why am I thanking Paul? I thank him because our GOP-infested Texas Legislature drew a map to redistrict Rep. Paul’s congressional district right into my very own Jefferson County, Texas. That meant Paul would have likely been my congressman beginning in 2013 provided he failed to win the GOP nomination or a third-party bid for president. Even though Paul maintains he quit his current day job as a lawmaker — the 75-year-old is a medical doctor and was a practicing OB/GYN — to concentrate on his presidential run there would have been a very good chance he would be returning to Congress.

Ron Paul will NOT be my congressman. Let's hear some cheers!

Some folks are skeptical that Paul got out of the congressional race to concentrate on a run for president. First of all, Paul has been down this road before. He ran in 1988 as a Libertarian candidate for president. He came in third with 0.5% of the popular vote behind George H.W. Bush and Michael Dukakis.

In 2008 Paul sought the Republican nomination, which he did not get. You may remember the controversy over his newsletter that was supposedly ghost written, containing a number of racially-tinged comments around the time of that presidential run.

A number of talking heads suggest that Paul is intelligent enough to know that there is no way in Hell he could ever win the GOP nomination, or another third-party try for that matter. Paul is instead in the race for as long as he can afford to do so in order to have his message heard. Anyone who has studied political science, or even paid attention in high school government classes for that matter, knows most third-party or long-shot candidates for president run to make a particular point of view heard. Paul has a loyal following and is dubbed by some as the “Father of the Tea Party.” That alone is reason enough for my thanking Congressman Paul for his service, both in the military as a flight surgeon and as an elected official, but most of all for his decision not to run for what would be my member of Congress.

Others out there believe the redistricting job was meant to derail Paul’s chances of returning to office. A post on a Website titled “The Daily Paul” said the Texas Legislature added about 300,000 votes to the new congressional district including my county and part of Galveston County so that Paul would find less voting age Anglos as well as more Hispanics and Blacks.

Nevertheless, Paul won’t be my new congressman and unless something changes with a judicial review of the new districts, neither will Rep. Ted Poe continue to be my old U.S. House member.

Ted Poe will NOT be my congressman either. Let's hear some cheers!

Now I must say that if the race for my congressional member was between Paul and Poe, I’d pick Paul. I’ve had Poe for however long now. At least Paul might get something done for his district unlike Poe, who spends his time waiting for an appearance on one of the right-wing Fox News shows. Wait, is that a redundancy? Otherwise you can find Poe on the border trying shoo the Mexicans away.

The question is, who will run the race for Congress in our district? Will some new Republican emerge from the Brazosport area or perhaps even one from Galveston or Beaumont? Beaumont has long had a Yellow Dog Democrat streak, pushed along by a large organized labor population. A lot of that has, unfortunately, changed. There are capable Democrats right here in Jefferson County who could dip into that pool of wealthy trial lawyer moolah that exists in an area in which the judicial reform types have called “A Judicial Hellhole.” Such wealth couldn’t hurt any candidate for Congress in our neck of the woods. I have asked before why no real Democrat challenge against Poe was organized during the last election. I have yet to get an answer. Poe’s only opponent in 2010 was a Libertarian.

One of the names that immediately pops up as a possible Democratic candidate is former U.S. Rep. Nick Lampson. The former Jefferson County Tax Assessor-Collector lost out during the anti-Democrat sweep during the past election when Lampson ran for the seat vacated by convicted former House GOP kingpin Tom DeLay. Another Democrat name I heard mentioned today was former Jefferson County Judge Carl Griffith. There are other pols who could make a run, former Dem State Sen. David Bernsen, for one. Current Texas legislators, Democrat Rep. Joe Deshotel is a name to float, and since he became a turncoat last year, I guess you could also mention former Democrat-turned GOP Texas House Rep. Allan Ritter.

I have no idea the breadth of Democrat or GOP “talent” which lies in the new congressional district in counties such as Brazoria and Galveston.  But if the congressional district holds up to judicial review we might see ourselves with a good-old Southeast Texas “whoop ass” which is something we haven”t seen in a long time in our area U.S. House races. Whomever it might be who ultimately ends up as my congressman, all I hope — whether the lawmaker is a “D” or a “R” — is that the person is a better representative than Ron Paul and Ted Poe.That, of course, isn’t a very high bar I realize.

For now, today at least, I  can say: “Yippie-yi-yay!”