Help? In Texas for federal workers, what’s that?

Here we are in familiar territory. Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more. Deja vu all over again. I’ve seen this picture. Whatever cliché one wants to use or abuse, another government shutdown showdown rears its head like a missing Egyptian Cobra rearing its head in surrender in the Bronx Zoo.

How many times have we seen this place? Is this the third concurrent resolution coming to an end, the second? I know its more than one.

The issue is more than just will I be “furloughed” from my part-time job and be paid or not be paid after all the congressional hubris settles. Will a budget finally be passed so I can have my measly $204-attaboy tied up, supposedly because to the budget SNAFU. (For those of you who don’t know but always wondered: “Situation Normal, All F***ed Up.”)

On a whim, I called one of our Texas Workforce Commission Centers a few days ago where the wait to speak with a live person for one minute turned into about a five-minute wait. Still, I spoke with a very nice, Hispanic-sounding lady to whom I explained my circumstances and to whom I asked  whether I could receive unemployment benefits if we are furloughed.

Being the government, of course, it wasn’t something lending itself to a simple answer. Yet, the person with whom I spoke said it depended on whether I made money during a certain time period over the last couple of years.  It also depends on whether the state asks the federal government for money to pay the unemployment.

“Say what?”

I chuckled and said: “Good luck with that.”

The TWC lady laughed and said: “Yeah, no kidding.”

 (Note: This is where my computer fizzled out the other day)

Thus, if federal workers are furloughed if the government is shut down on the next budget stalemate, the odds of getting unemployment would be unlikely because the state government and our fine-haired governor will do nothing to rankle their radical right voters.

So if federal workers can’t pay bills, so what? Let them eat from garbage bins in the street. Been there, have been close to doing that.

We have some remarkable Christian leaders in this nation and in the state of Texas, don’t we? God help them. Someone sure needs to do so.

Libya lights up presidential detractors from all sides. And your point is?

The Yahoo headline says it all: “Obama taking heat from all sides for Libya action.”

Writer Jim O’Sullivan explains in his National Journal piece, the article for which the Yahoo headline trumpets, that President Obama is taking a bipartisan bitching over his decision to take part in the UN action aimed at keeping strongman Mummar Quadaffi from slaughtering innocent civilians.

Such news is hardly a revelation. While Obama did seem to waffle a bit at first on the possibility of military action he has delivered a plan to go in and hopefully get out while perhaps saving thousands of Libyan lives. Why? Because Quadaffi is about three-quarters a bubble off  the level and whether he does major damage to his own people and to the oil fields of Libya are — like it or not — in the national interest of the U.S. Yes, Oil.

Getting Obama to admit that oil is a big factor in his decision will not likely happen. Just as such admissions weren’t forthcoming from the Presidents Bush in first Iraq and then, uh, Iraq.

The U.S. Air Force said two airmen are safe after ejecting over northeast Libya Monday afternoon from a F-15E Strike Eagle such as this one. (U.S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Aaron Allmon)

The big difference between Obama and, at least the latter Bush, is that Obama doesn’t have near the propaganda machine the Republicans had in the run up and early stages of the Iraq War. Why the GOP would inspire the populace to draw and quarter anyone who made ill remarks  against the president while he was out of the country and we were at war (such as Obama was this weekend in Brazil), if Bush was in office. All of this thanks to the mouthing of Limbaugh, Beck, Coulter, Malking, O’Reilly, Hannity, and Fox News in general, ad nauseam (really ad nauseam). Remember the Dixie Chicks? They were blacklisted just because Natalie Maines was brave enough to say what thousands of other Texans said everyday, that they were ashamed George “Gee Dubya” Bush was a Texan.

A journalistic axiom is that if you piss off enough people on either side of an issue then you must certainly be doing your job. Well, on one side Obama has Dennis Kucinich going off like a little pop pistol and Sen. Richard Lugar on the other side is all ablaze — as much as the lethargic  Republican can be lit up  — over the president’s apparent use of the War Powers Act. So far, Obama has seemed to satisfy the law.

It, of course, it goes without saying that the opposition to the president will not ever, ever, lavish the “Black Man in the White House” with praise. Everything Obama does and says is wrong, according to the opposition. His wife wants to tell us what to eat. His children are  terrorist babies. His dog bites rich white guys.

So to sum up the “news” that Obama is being castigated from all sides, does the phrase “No s**t, Sherlock” ring a bell?

 

O’Keefe back with new right-wing sleaze

CORRECTION: In a case of too many Schillers, we learned that Ron Schiller is a fundraising executive for NPR while Vivian Schiller is the organization’s CEO. They are, apparently, not related. Vivian Schiller resigned over the exec’s remarks. Ron Schiller has sped up his planned departure in May by  resigning effective immediately.

A clandestine videotape taken of NPR head Ron Schiller calling Tea Party members “racists” has given the right wing something to say “Gotcha” about.

The tape was released today as part of Project Veritas, an ambush expose’ outfit headed by rightist activist James O’Keefe, on which Schiller was caught making a few statements which opponents would probably say is a wide generalization of the ultra-right-wing political movement. O’Keefe has been involved in a number of stunts targeting those he see as leftist enemies. The list includes the activist organization ACORN, and a failed, but sleazy attempt to catch CNN investigative reporter Abbie Boudreau in a compromising position. A bungled attempt to wiretap the office of Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana led to O’Keefe and associates pleading to lesser, federal misdemeanor charges of entering a federal facility under false pretenses. O’Keefe received three year’s probation, a $1,500 fine and 100 hours of community service.

Schiller made the comments — I haven’t heard or seen a full transcript of the two-hour tape — during a meeting in February with two men posing as potential donors from a group affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. O’Keefe’s organization said on their Web site that the fakers had posed as “a non-existent group with a goal to ‘spread the acceptance of Sharia across the world. ‘ ”  Of course, one wonders how they could spread anything around the world if the organization didn’t exist?

NPR, of course, which receives federal funding has been trying to apologize ten different ways for the gaffe and I suppose that is the thing to do

One thing to be sure of, when the head of a large organization which depends on donors talks privately with potential money sources there will likely be people with points of view which might inadvertently rub others the wrong way. One must also wonder, would Schiller laugh, say nothing, or storm out indignantly if his potential donor had been an extreme right-winger who told a racist joke about Obama?

Even though Schiller would still have been hot water he would have the truth on his side had he qualified his remarks with “some of the Tea party members are white, gun-toting racists.” You can’t convince me otherwise that “some” aren’t.

O’Keefe, for his part, seems to have taken a high-tech approach to the guerrilla tactics of 60s left-wing groups what with their stopping short of little to prove their point. I could imagine that he is relishing in all the attention he is getting.  His statements indicate he holds delusions of grandeur, and seeing himself doing great journalism. Credits for the O’Keefe-produced video go to “PV investigative reporters” Shaughn Adeleye and Simon Templar, according to the Project Veritas Web site.  The name Simon Templar, for those who might not know or remember, is the name of a fictional thief in a series of books and the late 1960s television show, “The Saint.The latter starred later James Bond, Roger Moore.

While some undercover video has proven essential in good journalism, a difference exists between exposing that which is wrong and exposing that which is goaded wrong. People say things for different reasons. Likewise, sometimes in the world of business a person has to think about when is the right time to take a stand and when should one just keep their mouths shut. Clearly, the latter would have been the more prudent path for Schiller even though like many, many others, what he said about some Tea Party members is only four-to-six letters from hammering the nail.

The video has harmed NPR and I hate to see that. Maybe it isn’t everyone’s cup of tea. Perhaps it seems a little uppity at times. It mostly isn’t. The network of stations do provide a worthwhile alternative to the mindless sea of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and robo disc jockeys one finds on radio these days. I read their news online quite often because I know they have some very talented reporters, some of whom go to places no other journalists go to these days.

As for O’Keefe and company, they are doing the right-wing’s dirty work. The right cannot provide thoughtful debate on the issues in the open air so they use the gutter as their forum. O’Keefe may consider what his people do as journalism. I see it closer to pitiful performance art tied up into character assassination. I don’t think the video, in the end, will matter a whole lot.

 

Jobs: Lower unemployment rate but someone somewhere hates it

I have some good news and some bad news.

Wait! I have good news that is bad news. Or else, I’ve got bad news that is good news. Such is the nature of news. Well, that and writing up a cop report about a store clerk being assaulted with a frozen burrito. Ouch.

Obviously, whether news is good or bad is in the eye of the beholder, or the editor.

The subject of unemployment is such a topic. You might scratch your head and say: “How can an improvement on our unemployment rate be bad?” Take it from a guy who has written almost as many unemployment stories as weather stories, unemployment is a subject to praise by some and scorn by others.

Just read this story in the Wall Street Journal blog. It says the rapid rate of employment may tighten the monetary policy. The writer says employment rate has outrun the level of payroll growth. That’s a bad thing, according to this guy.

Economists will argue this topic until the cattle futures come home. And if you can get economists to agree on anything about this issue, then you are a cinch to find no politicians who agree. I hardly gamble anymore, but I would be bold enough to bet someone $100 that if unemployment got to a monthly rate on which economists could agree was a positive event you wouldn’t find any Republican to agree the jobs rate was great.

Well, perhaps I should not take that bet. I see here that the Republicans see today’s unemployment rate drop to 8.9 percent positive so they take credit for the drop. Yep, it was all their yapping about the deficit that did. I don’t have to read on to see what the Democrats think.

It’s kind of like a bumper sticker I saw not long after the change of the century that said: “Same s**t, different century.” That about sums it up.

 

 

A dog’s life this waiting (Warning: This has nothing to do with dogs)

Quite a few folk will not have to worry about a paycheck for another two weeks as President Obama signed a continuing resolution to keep the government going through March 18. That is sort of, kinda, borderline good news.

Oh, it’s going to make some people mad, those who say the $4 billion  in cuts are too little, and those who feel the sting of reducing funds. However, the cuts are in programs Obama had already targeted. Not exactly a “win-win.” I despise that word. That is unless it is said by hot actress and former Dallas Cowboy cheerleader, Sarah Shahi, who stars in USA network’s new series “Fairly Legal.” Shahi, who is incidentally of Spanish and Iranian descent, plays a lawyer who gets fed up with the profession and becomes a mediator. Win-win. Say it all you want sweetie. Oh, and if you are a bigot who doesn’t like Iranians, Spanish or both just because of their heritage, then you probably won’t like me either. And I don’t give rat’s ass.

Yes, it’s already a week like that.

Back on the point though, the continuing resolution just puts off another possible shutdown for those who work for or whose livelihood is tied to a federal government entity.

If I thought that the politicians who are responsible for this are principled and really believed that hurting more than a million workers and their families, and possibly putting a major dent in the economy, at least in the short term, as a way to trim the budget then perhaps it would make me feel at least a little better. Holy … that’s a long sentence. Plum near wore me out. But you get my drift.

It is hard to see how these people, the lawmakers and those who elected them, get it.

As the waiting continues, it just goes on, like a dog scratching itself.