Bugged back into the last century

Nothing much inspiring here today. CNN has made a big drama out of the faux drama that is our countdown to a shuttered government. There isn’t anything I can do about it. All of my federal legislators are hard-core right-wingers. I work tomorrow if my supervisor calls me and tells me to. Talk about a feeling of helplessness. Sigh!

It’s time to travel back to 1976 …

 

1976

 

What in the name of Windex is that? Well, it isn’t 1976. Perhaps it is something one might see in the Big Thicket piney woods of Southeast Texas back in the year of our nation’s Bicentennial. That is after a trip to the local cow pasture. You know, cow tipping? Right.

Those streaks are actually from last week. One might still be battered by love bugs while traveling along the roads in the Big Thicket area of Southeast Texas. As the weather cools a bit, the randy bugs will do whatever they do when they aren’t killing themselves while copulating along the highway.

Time to contemplate great matters. Or watch some tube.

The locomotives are fired up and ready to crash

When one envisions a train wreck it is likely two locomotives barreling down the tracks at each other as was the case during the late 19th century stunt known as the “Crash at Crush.”

George Crush was a railroad passenger agent who had the lofty idea of bringing thousands of people from across Texas to watch two locomotives crash into each other at top speed. The Missouri, Katy and Texas Railroad, for whom Crush was employed, thought it an acceptable idea and four miles of track were built for the 1896 spectacle that was to be staged some 15 miles north of Waco. Some might ask, “Where else?” when something spectacularly weird or tragic takes place. Waco is definitely a news-rich environment at times.

Some 80,000 people gathered on the big day for a helping of food, fun and good ol’ Texas politickin’ at the event dubbed the “Crash at Crush.” The two old locomotives gathered heads of steam that would make the “Little Train That Could” envious and the collision, of course, resulted in a grand display of physics. Unfortunately, hot, flying, debris from the train crash rained down on the visitors. The stunt killed three and seriously injured six. The event was captured in song by Texas ragtime artist Scott Joplin’s “Great Crush Collision.” The M-K-T railway, which eventually merged into Union Pacific, was called “The Katy” for the letters “K-T.” Coincidentally, the blues standard “She Caught the Katy (And Left Me A Mule To Ride)” was recorded by the great modern blues artist Taj Mahal. I can just imagine how hellish it must have been to traverse those few Central Texas prairie roads on a mule.

So you have a train wreck, what else do you have?

Well, I can see those two old locomotives now, rushing and crushing into big and small parcels of shrapnel seemingly falling from the heavens as the crowd stands mesmerized. Thus, we have the concept: “Watching a train wreck happen, in slow motion, and unable to do anything about it.”

I know the feeling. I feel it now as, perhaps the most over-inflated ego and demagogue to hit the U.S. Senate since Sen. “Tail Gunner” Joe McCarthy, tries to orchestrate a train wreck in the hallowed halls of Congress. I speak of Republican/Anarchist/Tea Party Sen. Ted Cruz from Texas attempts a legislative equivalent of holding his breath until his face turns blue. If only he would do that and … Sorry.

A veritable frenzy engulfs the great and mighty Ted Cruz by the national media. He is different and more exciting than those stuffy old numbers of the treasury and the stuffed shirts of Capitol Hill. Cruz, in his own right a media and Tea Party darling, is also alienating members of his own party. Another “Man Bites Dog” in the eyes of the 24/7 cable era.

The media has done a fair job of predicting the monetary costs that would arise if Cruz succeeds in his machinations to both shut down the government and stop funding of Obamacare There is likewise the enormous harm to citizens that Cruz and his anarchists could do with shuttering the federal government . The media talks of that some.

But not a word is said of the hundreds of thousands of lives that could be colossally damaged if a government shutdown happens. I am talking of government employees. I can give you thousands upon thousands of harmful results that could befall the government worker in the event of another federal shuttering. Even the military would feel the harm, although the troops themselves would still be protecting us. Thousands of bills may go unpaid. Who knows the numbers of unpaid mortgage or rents the closed federal government might spring. Missed car payments and electric bills. Will there be street people who carry a GS-7 rank? If a shutdown happens and lasts only a day or two, there is no guarantee the workers will get that back pay. Long-term, some government employees might collect unemployment. But it isn’t a ssgiven, as that is handled from state-to-state.

No one is talking about these human costs. Maybe the media is doing that in Washington. I don’t know. I’m lucky if i can read the Washington Post twice a week online. No one is talking so here I am.

This runaway train needs to stop. We don’t need a Crash at Crush in Congress.

Just how stupid are those folks who want to shut down the gub-mint?

Imagine how it would feel having a somewhat comfortable job only to have the threat of it shutting down two or three times a year?

That is the way it has blown during this and the last fiscal year for government employees. And we aren’t just talking about so-called “bureaucrats” whom you condemn because either you have had a bad experience with a government employee or your favorite political talking head has said you should hate the government.

Unless you are completely shut away from the government, there is some arm that is there to do something for you whether you realize it or not. Who comes and gets you when you ignore warning signs in the national parks and find yourself hopelessly lost and trapped by a hostile sleuth of bears? Who takes care of your 90-year-old veteran father who you can no longer care for, nor can you afford to put him in a home? If you get an increase in your social security or veterans benefit checks, do those hikes appear magically? No, and a hint, these increases don’t come as a brainchild of Congress (although Congress and brainchild do seem oxymoronic.) Whose job is it to ensure that aircraft run about orderly in the airways and don’t continually come crashing out the sky? Who administers and rules the U.S. military in such a way that we are not always beset by a coup d’etat?

Those are just a few instances of civilians who work for the U.S. government. And there are many more, although those conservatives who teeter on the edge of anarchy paint any government as bad, bad, bad. Thankfully, that is a relatively small number of people who side on the likes of Sens. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

Congress passed the Affordable Health Care Act, the so-called “Obamacare.” Now the GOP in Congress wants to ensure it isn’t funded. The country is, roughly, split over liking or disliking Obamacare. There are polls showing though that it is gaining popularity in states where it has already been implemented. And the idiot-children who want to shut down the federal government if they don’t get their way and withhold funding for the health care act? The American public is nor so inclined. Several polls reported by the conservative-friendly Fox News say the public does not want the government shutdown, even if it means de-funding Obamacare. The Republican party itself in Congress doesn’t like Obamacare, of course, but congressional members too are split over withholding money for the government to operate in exchange for no money for Obamacare.

Many astute Republican politicians can see the writing on the wall. A shutdown of the federal government would be what my Daddy used to say was a “Mellofahess!” It lost the GOP Congress the last time a shutdown took place. And the same looks as if it might happen should the Republicans be so stupid.

The big question is: Are the Republicans as stupid as during the Clinton era? I hope not, for my sake and for that of the country.

Even the simplest of facts in the Alexis mass murder story is nuanced

When tragedies such as the Washington Navy Yard massacre occur it becomes apparent — through the media — that the public doesn’t know shit from Shinola when it comes the military.

All day yesterday I heard that former Naval Reservist Aaron Alexis of Fort Worth had been given a general discharge upon release from active reserve duty. Alexis, 34, died after allegedly slaughtering 12 people yesterday in the Naval Sea Systems Command, located at the Navy Yard. Today, in mostly written tones that appeared mostly accusatory, The Washington Times, updated the information saying Alexis was given a honorable discharge. The Times is the conservative mouthpiece of D.C. founded by cult leader Sun Myung Moon. The Navy added Alexis was discharged after a period of “misconduct.”

In realty, there isn’t much difference between a general and an honorable discharge. Of course, the nut jobs will assume what was in reality an upgrade had to do with race. These nut jobs see any advantage a black person receives is given rather than earned. The major difference  in discharges or practically anything else regarding military service is in the type of job one does, the type of unit one is in, whether the commanding officer is understanding or not, and whether a person has a decent supervisor. I’m not saying there isn’t racism still in the military, but the service is generally less racist than other portions of society.

The chronological times also define military separations. That is, whether the military needs people really bad, especially those in critical jobs. When I served in the Navy from 1974-1978, the major difference between a honorable discharge and a general discharge under honorable conditions was that the latter was given the honorable discharge providing the individual had performance marks above 2.5 on a 0 to 4.0 scale. As for benefits distinguishing the two, an honorably separated sailor could wear his Navy uniform home from the service when I was honorably separated. Someone with a general separation could not. The criteria for discharges change from time-to-time.

I distinguish “separation” and “discharge” here. A person is separated from that individual’s particular date of active duty. I signed up for four years active duty and two years “individual ready reserve.” The latter is a non-drilling type of reserve which is only called up in time of great military need. I could not have seen that happening at all to me between 1978 and 1980. Likewise, no “IRR” call-up occurred. But there were IRR personnel called up during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Once that inactive reserve time is served, you may be like me and forgot you were even in the IRR when all of a sudden, a big envelope comes in the mail with a cheaply-made Honorable Discharge certificate. You, or in this case, I, was finally discharged.

Someone should not look upon the type of discharge Alexis had as a major factor of determining what went wrong with him. He said that he had PTSD from having served as a first-responder at 9/11 at the World Trade Center. Whether that is true remains to be seen.

The internet offers instant analysis. True I am giving someone an instant analysis, but the majority is based on knowledge of the armed forces. That is at least the case for one period in U.S. military history. I just ask that someone gets his or her information from a trusted, or semi-trusted, source before floating it all over the internets.

It’s just a thought. If you don’t like it, you sure as shit don’t have to read it.

Do you agree with these Harris respondents about places to live?

Just now I came across an interesting poll, of sorts, by Harris, concerning states and cities where people would most want to live in the U.S. After reading the list, I am left wondering just how these respondents made their decisions for these questions. Let us take in the top states in which those who were asked would most like to live other than in their own state:

1. California

2. Hawaii

3. Florida

4. Texas

5. Colorado

6. New York

7. Arizona

8. North Carolina

9. Oregon

10. Washington

Take a look at the states folks said they would least want to live other than their own state:

1. California

2. Alaska

3. New York

4. Mississippi

5. Florida

6. Michigan

7. Texas

8. Alabama

9. District of Columbia

10. New Jersey

It is kind of funny some of those picked as favorite also land in the least favorable with California topping both lists. My state of Texas makes No. 4 in most and No. 7 in the least. I have lived in Texas for all but the four years I served in the Navy. I spent about 3 of those Navy years in Mississippi and about 4 months in California. The first was divided among about six weeks in Meridian, Miss., for training, and the remainder in Gulfport on shore duty. The rest of my time was spent in Long Beach, Calif. and San Diego in between my deployment on a destroyer to the West and South Pacific. I say that because I have no idea what, if anything, those who were questioned for the poll know about any of the states.

The degree to which those respondents knew from personal experience about those states that they judged would have been fascinating to find out. I knew a little about Mississippi and California, not a lot, but I also found that both states had a lot to offer with their beauty and their people.

Even odder are the choices made by those who were asked similar queries about American cities. Only one Texas city makes the top 15 and guess which one it was? You’re right if you say Austin. As always, I think Austin is a fine city. It has beauty. It is vibrant. Plenty of entertainment, music, a large university and the home for Texas government. But plenty of other Texas cities have much to offer as well. And as much as I hate to say it, Austin has become overrated.

So take a look at the polls and see what you think. I bet some of you are not as enamored about certain states and cities as are those Harris respondent. I suppose those polled are a special breed.