“The Republican Hour”

Watching the CNN program “Situation Room” with Wolf Blitzer just now makes me think the program should be renamed “The Republican Hour.”

Clap for the Wolfman.
Clap for the Wolfman.

The Senate Armed Services Committee member Tom Cotton, R, Ark, held forth on the Brussels attack as well as slamming the president over going to a ball game in Cuba while the attack was happening. Cotton was one of the Republican congressional members who met this week with Donald Trump. This came only a couple of weeks after a secret meeting  among the powerful in tech and politics discussing how to stop Trump. And who was on the guest list? Reportedly, Sen. Tom Cotton attended. The young Arkansas senator would not criticize Trump and only say about The Donald’s stand on waterboarding or beyond, that “the United States of America doesn’t torture.” He said “all” American soldiers undergo waterboarding. I don’t know whether that is true. I know it has been used in surviving training, especially with Special Forces. If you happened to be an active Army member or recent retired or former soldier send me a message.

Cotton served in the Army. He was a veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan although he reportedly spent most of his time in ceremonial duties in Washington, D.C.

Next up was another Wolf favorite, Sen. John McCain, R, he took the slam Obama route by saying we have a lack of leadership in fighting ISIS. As a prisoner of war in Vietnam, McCain went through torture that is beyond imagination. I was glad to hear his stand against torture, although with McCain, you never know when he may go off the deep end.

Blitzer has been chummy with GOP congressional members, particularly after the party gained the majority in Congress. To be fair, most of the members interviewed by Blitzer are either committee or subcommittee chairs even though some would quibble over that detail.

A favorite of  Wolf’s is the weasel-look-alike, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R, Utah, head of the House Committee on Oversight and Government. Say what you will, Chaffetz has an interesting background. He was a Democrat in college. His father was previously married to Kitty Dickson, the wife of former Democrat presidential candidate, and ex-Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis. Chaffetz was the co-chairman of the Dukakis campaign in Utah. Chaffetz was rejected after applying to the U.S. Secret Service. He was chairman for the Jon Huntsman GOP campaign for president during the 2004 campaign and was later Huntsman’s chief of staff. Despite his background with liberal and moderate politicians of both parties he is usually a hard-ass right-winger when the situation calls for it. Take his proposals which would reward the anti-government nuts like Clive Bundy.

This is not to say Wolf has gone native. But he does frequently have call-in interviews with Donald Trump, and it is no doubt that Blitzer was one of the large contributors of the estimated $2 billion in free advertising for the Trump.

Okay, maybe I just pick on the Republicans interviewed by Blitzer. I do think the famous cable journalist still has the reporter’s yearning for the “big scoop.” And, as I write this Wolf is about to interview a Democrat in Congress, so I will just conclude with this. I imagine true-believer Republicans still think CNN as that “liberal” network. I don’t think so. But I suppose it is all how one interprets the news.

Why can’t presidential candidates shut up?

If there is one talent in which politicians exceed it is making hay out of human tragedy, or more specifically, attacks of terrorism. The despicable attacks today in Brussels in which 30 people were killed is a perfect example.

The bombs ignited today in Belgium is claimed by the terrorist group du jour, ISIS. The three presidential candidates on the Republican side and the two on the Democrats slate weighed in, of course, after expressing their sympathy.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, was his usual caustic self. The senator took the attacks as a time to slam President Obama, who is in Cuba on a historic trip to Cruz’ ancestral home. Cruz criticized the president for “going to a baseball game with the Castros.” The GOP senator also attacked Republican front runner Donald Trump for his usual over-the-top demagoguery. I can’t be critical for the remarks on Trump except perhaps Cruz didn’t go  far enough in his remarks on his opponent. Plus, the obsession of Cruz and some  other Republicans have about Obama’s refusal to label terrorists “Radical Islamic Terrorists” — a term which paints all Muslims as radical terrorists — was launched once again.

Trump was all over the television repeating his ridiculous answers to terrorism, once again calling for waterboarding and even outright torture.

Trump also wants the U.S. to abandon NATO and advocates shutting down the border to, as he says, “figure out what is going on.” He likewise advocates patrolling Muslim neighborhoods by the police.

Even the Caspar Milquetoast of the GOP candidates, Ohio Gov. John Kasich,  said Obama needs to come home to organize a response to the ISIS bombings. The president made a historic visit to Cuba this week and plans a stop in Buenos Aires.

As one might imagine, the Democrats running for president responded to the Belgium attacks in a softer tone, calling for resolve in the face of terrorists.

I admit to having no plan to fight terrorism beyond the normal means here at home of reporting strange things left in stores and airports and calling police if you see some jihad-looking guys carrying a long, olive green box — which might contain a shoulder-fired rocket launcher — into their motel rooms at night. If it turns out they are setting up an electric train set, oh well, it’s the “war on terror.” Should I sometime admit to being facetious?

The presidential candidates all really need to shut up when incidences such as today’s attacks take place. No matter that they give our allies mixed signals and our enemies more “bulletin board material.”

After today we are all Belgians. Or is it we’re all Americans, or Brits or French or wherever terrorist acts occur?

The T-word

Earlier, I thought about writing something concerning that national, and likely international menace we all face, namely Donald Trump.

I must admit I had mixed feelings about the hundreds of protesters who have been dogging the leading GOP candidate. On the one hand, I was happy to see him shut down in Chicago. One wonders, however, whether that whole scene was a set-up to earn sympathy for Trump after his continual baiting of young protesters. Anyone with a brain should have known that the inner-city campus of University of Illinois at Chicago would bring out all kinds of young, racially-diverse people.

Then Trump calls up the TV networks that night to make himself the victim despite his calls for supporters to level violence on those who protest his rallies. He just keeps on talking, ignoring and oblivious to the ideas that this violence might have been caused, at least in part, by Trump. He calls the protesters “thugs,” a prominent GOP code word for “blacks.” He said the protesters were dangerous, swinging their fists all over the place. That is even though the only real connecting punches that could be seen were thrown by the 70-something Trump supporter at a rally last week.

Trump is quite simply, a liar and a hypocrite. However, many Republican candidates have both of those qualities. I can’t imagine what those in other civilized countries are thinking.

Whether Trump will “wrap” up his nomination in tonight’s results is hard to say. Most anti-Trump Republicans fear his nomination because they feel he is most vulnerable in the General Elections. Of course, there is still the Cleveland GOP convention this summer. And, if he is actually nominated, he might pick some off-the-wall vice presidential pick like John McCain did with Sarah Palin.

Hopefully, this menace Trump will be slowed down enough so the media can start digging up dirt on him rather than kissing his ass at every turn.

That is all I have to say. Here is a pretty  good wrap-up in Slate about the pathetic Republican candidate.

Weekend update: Trump violence and Rubio-Kasich weirdness

The Republican presidential campaign keeps getting weirder and even more disgusting.

Sen. Marco Rubio is running hard to get all the delegates from his home state of Florida. At the same time, Rubio is encouraging supporters in Ohio to vote for the Buckeye State Gov. John Kasich to deny a delegate sweep by Donald Trump. Kasich does not seem to appreciate the help. Personally, I’m kind of getting tired of Kasich  and his holier-than-thou act.

Lots of attention is being  paid to the violence erupting at Trump rallies, predominately that violence his supporters are committing against protesters. Trump, during last evening’s Republican debate, essentially brushed off the questions about the growing violence at his gatherings. This guy is champ at double-speak. I just can’t see how Trump is fooling so many people. He’s acting like this all some big joke. I don’t know about you but methinks electing a president is a deadly serious business.

When you have a great number of people in Republican politics who are trying nine ways to Sunday to figure out how to deny Trump a nomination in their party. Whether the GOP elders succeed or cave remains to be seen.

Mexico to Trump: ¡Vete a la mierda!

First, former Mexican presidents Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderón said it emphatically. Now, the Mexican government is saying “no” to GOP candidate Donald Trump and his proposal to build a high wall along the U.S.-Mexican border, and to make the southern U.S. neighbors pay for it.

The Associated Press article about an official Mexican response to the bombastic Trump came not from el Presidente Enrique Peña Nieto but rather the Mexican treasury secretary Luis Videgaray. One thing that is obvious, though not pertinent like Trump’s lame-brain idea, is that el Presidente is a much more handsome man than Trump could hope to be even with billions of dollars of plastic surgery. The Mexican first lady, Angélica Rivera, is also a smoking-hot former actress who looks unbelievably beautiful even after six kids.

Angelica, Si! Trump wall, no! Photo via Wikimedia Commons and Angelica Rivera.
Angelica, Si! Trump wall, no! Photo via Wikimedia Commons and Angelica Rivera.

Of course, Trump has had what some say are beautiful wives, two of whom are ex wives. All of which have little to do with affairs of state. Although, Donald Trump spoke his mind about the importance of looks when he insulted former exec and GOP hopeful Carly Fiorina.

Much of what Trump says apparently has the ability to reach the inner-stupidity of many folks.

Thus, an idea as unoriginal as building a big fence all across the U.S.-Mexico border shouldn’t come as a surprise coming from a person who seems to be chronically grabbing ideas out of his ass.  Trump always mentions the Great Wall of China when trying to explain an idea he would otherwise try to pass off as his own. The border wall idea in the U.S. is hardly an original idea in itself. And just as I wonder why we should feel so safe by building a big barrier, I continue to ask just how in hell, would such a structure defeat border crossings?

Trump, in talking about the northeastern U.S. border states facing a heroin problem, sounds as if he would just as soon build a wall across  our boundaries with Canada as well.

But my question is: What good would such a wall do? Drug traffickers have continually built tunnels to smuggle their wares into the U.S. The smugglers have, as well, tried sneaking drugs by plane, ship and home-made submarines.  So tell me Mr. Trump and your faithful: Do you intend to wall off our entire nation? This would make us more like the Cold War borders with the Soviet states than a alleged, freedom-loving nation that we pretend to be.

Perhaps in the days where cattle or sheep were the biggest intrusions of American life did good fences make good neighbors. Even that seems like a half-assed thought not to mention immaterial in this day and age where our skies are filled with thousands of aircraft. And that is not to mention how ridiculously crowded our skies will be if everyone can use one, two or a fleet of drones!

Finally, I suppose the subject of pure aesthetics should seem silly when considering national or domestic security. But, I mean, what about it? If we can’t peer into the mountains and deserts of Mexico. Who cares? Or if the next shoe falls when we can’t drive 45 miles south to the Gulf of Mexico, from where I live, to see the beach and the tranquility of the gentle waves no more, oh well, it’s not all that pretty up here in the northern Gulf Coast anyway.

If we are going to let others think for us, then at least let’s have an original thinker and not some narcissistic con man who could just as easily become our nation’s Führer.